Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
F-15s And EM Interferance  
User currently offlineDeltaDC9 From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 2844 posts, RR: 4
Posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 3634 times:

I was in Panama City Beach last week, which is close to an Air Force base. F-15s would fly down the beach, real low, hot doggin it for the bikinis, no problem with that...

BUT. As I sat at the pool working on my laptop, connected via WIFI, I would lose my connection when they passed by at about 200 feet.

Whats up with that?

Dont take life too seriously because you will never get out of it alive - Bugs Bunny
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineBladeLWS From United States of America, joined Dec 2005, 403 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 3590 times:

The military also uses the same frequencies that WiFi uses, so thats probably what the interference was.

User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 17
Reply 2, posted (8 years 11 months 4 weeks ago) and read 3521 times:

quite likely. WIFI networks are allowed only under the condition that they don't interfere with military use, which means (among other things) they can only transmit at very low power and have to absorb any radiation in their bands without causing sideband transmission back to the source.
Same holds for such things as radio remote control keys for cars and remote garagedoor openers.

I wish I were flying
User currently offlineDeltaDC9 From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 2844 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 3424 times:

Thanks guys, I was pretty sure there was no ECM thing going on, but there had to be an easy explanation.

Dont take life too seriously because you will never get out of it alive - Bugs Bunny
User currently offlineChecksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 1188 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 11 months 3 weeks 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 3359 times:

Certain types of RADAR are can also be minorly disruptive...

User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 5574 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (8 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 3287 times:

Might interference increase with the planned upgrade of F-15Cs to AESA radars?......



"The emergency supplemental funding bill for fiscal year 2007, signed by President George Bush in late May, contains about $62 million to upgrade a small number of active duty F-15Cs with an enhancement of the "brick" array APG-63(V)2 radar previously integrated to now use a tile design, says Mike Henchey, Raytheon business development director. Raytheon has previously designated this as the APG-63(V)3, but it is likely to enter service under a new designation in the APG-series, he says. The (V)3 variant refers to the active array of transmitter/receiver modules, with this front-end to be mated with the APG-63(V)1 radar processor already installed on most of the USAF's active duty F-15Cs.

It is unclear how many USAF aircraft will be upgraded to the AESA standard, but with the Air National Guard also having an ongoing programme to order AESA upgrades for up to 48 F-15Cs and the previous batch of aircraft, Raytheon is likely to convert at least 70 aircraft to the new standard, with additional orders likely to follow.

The air force is also running a competition to upgrade the radars on its F-15E fleet to AESA systems. A winner is expected to be announced in October, with the APG-63 bidding against a version of the Northrop Grumman APG-77 installed on the Lockheed Martin F-22."

"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic F-15s And EM Interferance
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
B52's Up Close And Personal posted Tue May 29 2007 05:10:33 by Jupiter2
CF C-130J And C-17 posted Mon May 28 2007 06:55:00 by ZBBYLW
V-22 And AN 124 Coming To DAY Airshow posted Thu May 17 2007 18:11:55 by DAYflyer
Tornado F.3 External Fuel Tank Capacity And Weight posted Thu May 10 2007 04:03:38 by MD11Fanatic
Licensing And Competition? posted Fri May 4 2007 22:14:00 by CannibalZ3
WW2 Ace And Test Pilot, Neville Duke, Passes Away posted Fri Apr 13 2007 21:33:20 by GDB
Lack Of "turkey Feathers" On F-15 And B-1B posted Fri Apr 6 2007 08:04:06 by SCAT15F
C5 And A C17 At TPA posted Tue Mar 13 2007 03:15:25 by Crogalski
The F 22 And The US Navy posted Fri Mar 9 2007 01:50:11 by Beta
E-2C ID And F-15 Picture Question posted Sun Feb 25 2007 04:33:06 by TedTAce

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format