Must have something to do with ex Pres. Bill Clinton here speaking at the Grand Rapids Economics Club adding to his $10 million in earnings from giving speeches....
Does he, and every ex-POTUS, reimburse the government and taxpayers for their executive transportation on military G-V's and other military aircraft flying them to their profitable speaking engagements? Sure hope so......
[Edited 2007-06-18 19:57:56]
Direct KNOBS, maintain 2700' until established on the localizer, cleared ILS runway 26 left approach.
DL021 From United States, joined May 2004, 11075 posts, RR: 97 Reply 1, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 2316 times:
President Clinton is most assuredly not travelling on US government aircraft unless at the direct request of President Bush.
I'd bet there's another reason for that C-37 to be there....and it is listed on Anet as being a USAF aircraft. Perhaps it is carrying the Army COS or something.
ZANL188 From United States, joined Oct 2006, 1953 posts, RR: 0 Reply 3, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 6 days ago) and read 2285 times:
Quoting DL021 (Reply 1): President Clinton is most assuredly not travelling on US government aircraft unless at the direct request of President Bush.
Quoting DL021 (Reply 1): I'd bet there's another reason for that C-37 to be there....and it is listed on Anet as being a USAF aircraft. Perhaps it is carrying the Army COS or something.
The Army has their own VIP Gulfstreams in the 89ths paint scheme, has had them that way for years. A.net database is wrong.
Legal considerations provided by: Dewey, Cheatum, and Howe
KC135TopBoom From United States, joined Jan 2005, 7595 posts, RR: 51 Reply 5, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 2197 times:
Quoting ZANL188 (Reply 3): The Army has their own VIP Gulfstreams in the 89ths paint scheme, has had them that way for years. A.net database is wrong.
No, all thes airplanes (except those assigned to the USN/USMC) have been assigned to the USAF, this includes the C-20/C-37s originally assigned to the Army and the Coast Guard. When a US Army 4 star flys aboard, if there is no assogned call sign, will use an "Army-XXXX" (tail number) call sign.
ZANL188 From United States, joined Oct 2006, 1953 posts, RR: 0 Reply 6, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 2171 times:
Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 5): No, all thes airplanes (except those assigned to the USN/USMC) have been assigned to the USAF, this includes the C-20/C-37s originally assigned to the Army and the Coast Guard. When a US Army 4 star flys aboard, if there is no assogned call sign, will use an "Army-XXXX" (tail number) call sign.
Sorry Top - I've worked the Army PAT jets and know the Army crews, CWO 3 & 4s mostly. They are based at Andrews and wear the same colors as the 89th but they fly with the Army "PAT" callsign, are operated by Army crews, and they don't swap or share jets with the 89th.
Legal considerations provided by: Dewey, Cheatum, and Howe
474218 From United States, joined Oct 2005, 3768 posts, RR: 1 Reply 10, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2148 times:
Quoting Fumanchewd (Reply 7): I doubt Clinton has enough dough to own and operate a GIV. Its either a charter or someone flew him 91 on their own aircraft.
Clinton and his part time wife (the senator) filed a financial disclosure last week were they disclosed that they just sold between 5 and 25 million dollars worth of stocks. The senates rules are really loose when it comes to how much you have to disclose, that is the reason for the large gap in the low and high amounts. He can afford to operate GIV.
Fumanchewd From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 11, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2145 times:
Quoting 474218 (Reply 10): Clinton and his part time wife (the senator) filed a financial disclosure last week were they disclosed that they just sold between 5 and 25 million dollars worth of stocks. The senates rules are really loose when it comes to how much you have to disclose, that is the reason for the large gap in the low and high amounts. He can afford to operate GIV.
Maybe for a year. He would barely be able to buy one and the operating expenses would be too much for him. He isn't Oprah.
Quoting Fumanchewd (Reply 11): Maybe for a year. He would barely be able to buy one and the operating expenses would be too much for him. He isn't Oprah.
$40 Million in 6 years, I'd say he could afford to operate a G-IV:
Fumanchewd From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 13, posted (2 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2060 times:
Quoting Tjwgrr (Reply 12): $40 Million in 6 years, I'd say he could afford to operate a G-IV:
You could be right and I don't know what you do.
I do work with G-IV owners, however, and I don't know of any as "poor" as the Clintons.
I've seen people who are very wealthy purchase Gulfstreams only to sell them a year later for a smaller aircraft because they didn't understand the costs involved.
They may have made $40 million but don't forget that transportation costs for this bracket of people is only a small percentage of the budget. The Clintons also have many properties. I believe they just purchased a property in Central America for millions last month. Take into consideration the multiple million dollar homes that they have purchased and have to maintain. With all of their expenses do you think that they would seriously purchase and operate a Gulfstream for 50% or more of their budget and worth?
Of course not. They would rather invest the money and live a good life. There is "house poor" and there is "plane poor".
Again, I don't know if they have purchased one or not, but in my experience and with pragmatic thinking I do not believe that they would purchase one. They could, but it would be idiotic to spend that much of a budget on transportation.
It is the equivalent of someone making $100,000 a year purchasing a Ferrari Enzo. It can be done but it would be stupid.
Sponsor Message: 
From United States, joined Mar 2000, 1829 posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
Sponsor Message: 
Printer friendly format
