Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Strange Russian Aircraft, Any Info?  
User currently offlineENU From Netherlands, joined Nov 2006, 1166 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 32367 times:

I just came across these pictures in the database and I am just wondering what this military (?) aircraft is used for. Any background information will be appreciated!


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ilya Morozov - Russian AviaPhoto Team
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ilya Morozov - Russian AviaPhoto Team


[Edited 2007-06-28 01:32:15]

21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineNorthStarDC4M From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 3012 posts, RR: 37
Reply 1, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 32360 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CHAT OPERATOR

it's one of the Soviet Ekranoplan designs. It is "military", from the late 60s.


Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
User currently offlineConnies4ever From Canada, joined Feb 2006, 4066 posts, RR: 13
Reply 2, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 16 hours ago) and read 32345 times:

Quoting NorthStarDC4M (Reply 1):
it's one of the Soviet Ekranoplan designs. It is "military", from the late 60s.


N

I'll have to dig through my back issues of AIR International, but I think that's the one that was referred to as the "Caspian Sea Monster" by the CIA. Late 60s/early 70s.



Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
User currently offlineNorthStarDC4M From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 3012 posts, RR: 37
Reply 3, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 32335 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CHAT OPERATOR

quite possible... this is the one that actually entered service:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A-90_Orlyonok



Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4811 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 14 hours ago) and read 32308 times:

Quoting Connies4ever (Reply 2):
the one that was referred to as the "Caspian Sea Monster" by the CIA.

The head-on shot looks more like the "Mutant Ninja Turtle" to me.  Smile



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlineMandala499 From Indonesia, joined Aug 2001, 6849 posts, RR: 75
Reply 5, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 14 hours ago) and read 32291 times:

Isn't the Caspian Sea Monster the Lun-Class Ekranoplan? Only 1 entered service...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lun-class_ekranoplan

Yeah the photo's off the A-90... this is a smaller one with turboprop thruster and 2x turbojet forward and lift assist thrusters...

The Caspian Sea Monster was a bigger one... 8 jets... (4 as pure forward thrusters near the tail)...

My memory's vague...

Mandala499



When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
User currently offlineNorthStarDC4M From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 3012 posts, RR: 37
Reply 6, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 32243 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CHAT OPERATOR

Well the ORIGINAL Caspian Sea Monster was actually the single KM Ekranoplan...



The KM was actually "small" for an Ekranoplan...

The Lun class and the AS-90 were both later designs, much larger, that the CIA and USAF were still trying to fathom up into the 80s and were still known as Caspian Sea Monsters... but anyways, fascinating bit of engineering, pity it's never been used much...



Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
User currently offlineKBFIspotter From United States of America, joined May 2005, 729 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 32168 times:

Quoting NorthStarDC4M (Reply 6):
The Lun class and the AS-90 were both later designs, much larger

not quite true... Per Sergey Komissarov's book, Russia's Ekranoplans, the KM was the largest of the Alexeyev ekranoplans weighing in at 1,299,300lbs, and 300ft long. the Lun is 240ft long and weighs 838,000lbs, and the Orlyonok (A-90) ios 190ft and weighs 275,000lbs.

Only one KM was built, and it crashed in 1980, one Lun was completed, and is now Derilict at a Russian Amphibious base, and finally, three A-90s were built, and two crashed. It should be mentioned that there is a second lun basically complete in Nizhni Novgorod. Does any one have any information on this? I know that they were wanting to turn it into a search and rescue craft called the Spasatel.

Kris



Proud to be an A&P!!!
User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (7 years 2 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 32123 times:

Quoting NorthStarDC4M (Reply 6):
Caspian Sea Monsters... but anyways, fascinating bit of engineering, pity it's never been used much...

The window must have been copied from a B17 so ..  Wink



User currently offlineDeskflier From Sweden, joined Jan 2007, 537 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 31815 times:

The Soviets actually had a civilian version in service from the mid-1970s. It carried passengers along the great rivers in Ukraine and southern Russia, the Black Sea coast, and across the Caspian. No known international routes. I don't remember if they were operated by Aeroflot or if they were operated by the Soviet Ferry Service. Pretty sure though that the military variants were operated by the Navy rather than any Aviation Services (FA, AV-MF, or V-TA). Which would indicate that the Ekranoplanes were classified as boats rather than aircraft.

FA = Frontovaya Aviatsiya (Frontal Aviation)
AV-MF = Aviatsiya Voenno - Morskoi Flota (Aviation of the Military High-Seas Fleet)
V-TA = Voenno - Transportny Aviatsiya (Military Airlift Service)

Apologies for my poor Russian.



How can anyone not fly, when we live at a time when we can fly?
User currently offlineRHAnthony From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 41 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (7 years 2 months 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 31793 times:

How cool of a house boat would that make? I mean c'mon!!  Smile

Anyone have any KMLs for google earth to show where these places are you guys are talking about the left overs being? Would love to see one @ a dock.


User currently offlineSovietjet From Bulgaria, joined Mar 2003, 2604 posts, RR: 17
Reply 11, posted (7 years 2 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 31656 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Looks like the A-90 has 2xNK-8 turbojets and a NK-12 turboprop!! Imagine the sound that thing makes! Like a blend between older Tu-154s and a Tu-95. Music to the ears.

User currently offlineIgnat From Russia, joined Jan 2002, 54 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (7 years 2 months 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 31562 times:

Hello!
Deskflier,
There weren't any civil versions. A-90 were belonged to the Naval Aviation, 11th separate aviation group of ekranoplanes (the translation from Russian into English might be not accurately).


User currently offlineAutoThrust From Switzerland, joined Jun 2006, 1595 posts, RR: 9
Reply 13, posted (7 years 2 months 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 31549 times:

Impressive vid, thanks Kessje for posting it.This Ekranoplanes are really marvel of engeneering. Was there ever anything as fast as this things on the Water?

I 've readed that the number one point of the Ekranoplanes was they could under"fly" the Radar is this true?



“Faliure is not an option.”
User currently offlineRHAnthony From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 41 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (7 years 2 months 4 days ago) and read 31513 times:

I would imagine something that low would avoid radar, but I would think with ship radar now, that would be something harder to avoid. But... I doubt anything would catch it.

Wondering why this type of design wasn't persued, and it seems the idea for a while was to go to that stealth boat idea the US navy had for a long time. Seems this was working out great.

I could see rough seas being an issue though.

How long til it's on ebay?  Smile


User currently offlineDIJKKIJK From France, joined Jul 2003, 1791 posts, RR: 4
Reply 15, posted (7 years 2 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 31486 times:

What a monster, It ia almost as big as that submarine.


What exactly is a 'ground effect' ?



Never argue with idiots. They will bring you down to their level, and beat you with experience.
User currently offlineHaveBlue From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 2106 posts, RR: 1
Reply 16, posted (7 years 2 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 31478 times:

Quoting DIJKKIJK (Reply 15):
What exactly is a 'ground effect' ?

Ground effect is the phenominon whereby an aircraft flying within one wingspan of the ground has much less induced drag. Say that a planes wingspan is 100' wide. Well when that airplane flies within 100' of the ground its drag is significantly lower.

For an example, when going for my pilots license I practiced soft feild takeoffs. You would pull back on the yoke as you started the take off roll and instead of waiting for 60 knots to rotate you would get airborne as soon as possible, which I think was around 50 knots. Now your airborne at a speed that you can only fly at within that Cessnas 30' wingspan of the ground. So you keep it on the deck until you get that other 10 or so knots of speed, then climb out. Another words in that Cessna I was flying at a speed that was only possible that close to the ground because of the reduced drag.



Here Here for Severe Clear!
User currently offlineDIJKKIJK From France, joined Jul 2003, 1791 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (7 years 2 months 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 31474 times:

Quoting HaveBlue (Reply 16):

Excellent explanation! Thanks!



Never argue with idiots. They will bring you down to their level, and beat you with experience.
User currently offlineKeesje From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (7 years 2 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 31450 times:

In the seventies a version was developped that could fly both in ground effect but also at higher attitude / speeds by Beriev / Bartini. Three proto´s were build, dedicated to ASW.



A prototype is rotting away in an outdoor museum..



User currently offlineCorsair1107 From United States of America, joined Nov 2006, 121 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (7 years 2 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 31319 times:

Imagine the ear protection you'd need to pilot that beast with the 8 turbojets, bet it would have been fun though.


Flown on: DHC-6/8, F100, B1900C, 717, 727, 737, 757, 767, 777, 319, 320, C152/172, E135/145, DC-9, MD-83/88 CL600
User currently offlinePacificjourney From New Zealand, joined Jul 2001, 2732 posts, RR: 8
Reply 20, posted (7 years 2 months 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 31170 times:

I looked over one of those sat a military transport museum in Feodisia in the Ukraine. Not sure which model but it was big and beautiful.

Designed for amphibious assault mainly but too many problems with corrosion from flying too close to the sea water all the time.

They are definitely classed ships.



" Help, help ... I'm being oppressed ... "
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29795 posts, RR: 58
Reply 21, posted (7 years 2 months 9 hours ago) and read 31033 times:

Is there any good references to the aerodynamics of this form of transportation.

My understanding is that in the US the Erkanoplane falls under USCG not FAA rules.

Quoting Deskflier (Reply 9):
The Soviets actually had a civilian version in service from the mid-1970s.

There was a company proposing to use an Australian designed one in service in southeast alaska. I don't think anything came from it.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Strange Russian Aircraft, Any Info?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Any Info On C-17B? posted Thu Sep 8 2011 16:59:15 by 747400sp
Strange Russian Mock-Up At Russell Mil. Museum posted Sun Aug 21 2011 18:35:31 by fanofjets
Any Info On This Jet? posted Sun Apr 18 2010 18:33:00 by micreaux
Any Info About Kronflyg ORD-JFK Flt? posted Thu Nov 6 2008 18:24:23 by CanyonBlue17
RAF VC-10 At LAS: Any Info? posted Sun Apr 6 2008 15:06:31 by Matt D
RAF Intercepts Russian Aircraft posted Sun May 13 2007 10:49:15 by Levent
Russian Aircraft Carrier Crash posted Fri Feb 2 2007 23:07:19 by LMP737
Mexican AirForce Buying Russian Aircraft? posted Thu Jun 23 2005 19:03:23 by Pzurita1
Any Info On NAWC/NADC Johnsville. Warminster, PA posted Sun May 15 2005 01:29:30 by Jetjack74
Any Info? Boeing Globemaster In Hong Kong posted Fri Mar 25 2005 13:07:28 by CAptaintim

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format