Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
BWB: The Next Stealth Bomber?  
User currently offlineBlackbird1331 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1893 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 5174 times:

Is this a possibility? It somewhat resembles the B2 and it could easily be slimed downed to fit the B2 profile, but with a larger capacity. Or, could it also be a tanker?


Cameras shoot pictures. Guns shoot people. They have the guns.
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineEelonghorn From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 42 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 5167 times:

The B-2 is a Blended Wing Body.

User currently offlineMCIGuy From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 1936 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 2 months 2 weeks 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 4997 times:

As already said, the Beak is the epitome of a BWB, and the capacity is more than a lot of people think.


Airliners.net Moderator Team
User currently offlineBlackbird1331 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1893 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 2 days ago) and read 4683 times:

Please vist boeing.com. They just flew a BWB prototype today, 7/26, it does not look like a B2 to me.


Cameras shoot pictures. Guns shoot people. They have the guns.
User currently offlineCloudy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 4561 times:

There probably won't be a next "Stealth Bomber". The days of the manned, penetrating, large, long-range bomber are drawing to a close. The B1 and B2 were the last of their kind - the last strategic bombers intended to penetrate enemy airspace themselves. Instead, we will see more UAV's and stand-off weapons launched from platforms unable to "break down the door". If there is a new large bomber, it would probably be a "Bomb Truck" used mostly like the B52 is used today. It would fly in from long ranges to launch cruise missiles and drones before the enemy air defense is defeated, and would drop guided bombs from high altitudes after air supremacy is attained. BWB's are especially well adapted to that role, because one big difficulty in designing a BWB is making the fuselage strong enough to be pressurized. Bombers don't need the whole fuselage pressurized - just a smaller compartment for the crew. The same basic design could be used as a tanker, or even the same aircraft could perform both missions. We would have bomber/tankers rather than tanker/transports.

It is the need to penetrate enemy airspace that makes bombers expensive and hard to maintain. Since we have standoff weapons, UAV's, fighter-bombers, etc., we don't really need that capability anymore. When all you want to do is drop bombs on forces that can't attack at high altitude, or launch long-range cruise missiles, the old B52 does just fine. All a new large, long range bomber would have to do is replicate the capabilities of todays B52 - but with more efficient engines, a 2 person crew, etc. Since the main fuselage does not need to be pressurized, it could last a long time, perhaps even 50 years - as long as the B52.

IN SHORT.....The next large bomber will not be a replacement for the B1 and B2 but will be a different kind of aircraft entirely, with a completely different mission profile. It would do the same jobs the B52 does today, while non-bomber types take over the penetration mission. The BWB could be a good choice for that kind of mission.


User currently offlineBlackbird1331 From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 1893 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 4506 times:

Cloudy, some good points. But as I look at the BWB prototype, with the engines mouted on the center, tail section, wing strength is not a major problem. Besides, the plane olny needs to be large enough to complete the mission, not the same size as a 1,000 passenger commercial model. I would fly it conventionally and put more into counter-measures than stealth.

And for those who call the B2 a BWB, I respectfully disagree. It is a flying wing.



Cameras shoot pictures. Guns shoot people. They have the guns.
User currently offlineEELonghorn From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 42 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (7 years 1 month 3 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 4498 times:

I would argue that the flying wing is the most refined version of a bwb. As for saying that the b2 does not look like the bwb pictured, you are correct, but it is still a bwb. A 707 does not look like a 777, yet both are considered to be wing and tube design.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic BWB: The Next Stealth Bomber?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
X-48B; The Next Tanker, C, B Or What? posted Tue May 30 2006 08:46:42 by TedTAce
What Will Be The Next Heavy Transport Helicopter posted Thu Dec 23 2004 22:49:03 by Keesje
Future Of The F-117 Stealth posted Tue Feb 5 2002 03:52:05 by Hamfist
Next U.S.A.F. Bomber posted Sun May 6 2007 23:22:34 by DEVILFISH
F-117 Stealth Fighter Headed For The Boneyard posted Fri Feb 17 2006 00:27:10 by N5176Y
Stealth The Movie: A Glimpse Of The Future? posted Tue Aug 2 2005 22:58:19 by Greaser
Bomber Version Of The A343? posted Thu Apr 15 2004 15:25:15 by Qb001
The Elegant Handley-Page Victor Bomber posted Tue Aug 5 2003 21:20:08 by GDB
Why Not Keep The F-14 As A Full Time Bomber? posted Fri Mar 7 2003 06:20:01 by CX747
When Will The Kitty Hawk Deploy Next? posted Sun Jan 27 2002 04:21:34 by CX747

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format