Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Australia Picks Boeing P-8A MMA  
User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4938 posts, RR: 1
Posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 5224 times:

Defense-Aerospace reports that Australia has selected Boeing's P-8A MMA Poseidon as replacement for their AP-3C Orion maritime patrol and ASW aircraft.....

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/cgi...DH8AAAEAABRIN9QAAAAE&modele=jdc_34

Quote:
"First pass approval has been granted to allow Defence to commence formal negotiations with the United States Navy (USN) to participate in the cooperative development of the P-8A Multi-mission Maritime Aircraft (MMA).

Following an exhaustive examination of available options, the USN chose the Boeing Company to develop the P-8A MMA based on its 737 commercial aircraft. The P-8A MMA offers a modern, highly reliable commercially-proven airframe with the latest maritime surveillance and attack capabilities."


http://www.boeing.com/companyoffices...ry/images/military/p8a/K63510.html

Arguably, the P-8A may be the best currently on offer for this mission. It appears Boeing has got a tight grip on RAAF procurements. Hopefully, this would not be visited by the bugs that plagued their other sale to Australia.


"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineN328KF From United States of America, joined May 2004, 6491 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 5215 times:

Quoting DEVILFISH (Thread starter):
Arguably, the P-8A may be the best currently on offer for this mission. It appears Boeing has got a tight grip on RAAF procurements. Hopefully, this would not be visited by the bugs that plagued their other sale to Australia.

With that said, I'm sure fleet commonality with Wedgetail was a big contributory reason why this system was selected.



When they call the roll in the Senate, the Senators do not know whether to answer 'Present' or 'Not guilty.' T.Roosevelt
User currently offlineEBJ1248650 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1932 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 5184 times:

Quoting DEVILFISH (Thread starter):
Arguably, the P-8A may be the best currently on offer for this mission. It appears Boeing has got a tight grip on RAAF procurements. Hopefully, this would not be visited by the bugs that plagued their other sale to Australia.

What else is currently available that is in production? Would an update of their current P-3 Orions be a better option?



Dare to dream; dream big!
User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4938 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 5163 times:

Quoting EBJ1248650 (Reply 2):

What else is currently available that is in production?

EADS have an MPA version of the Airbus A319 to compete with the P-8A, though I don't how far along it is in its development....

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...-a319-with-bomb-bay-doors-for.html

I understand Germany or the UN has an A320 in a similar configuration?

Quoting EBJ1248650 (Reply 2):
Would an update of their current P-3 Orions be a better option?

One may think that LM's proposed P-7 Orion 2000 could have been a good candidate too had it progressed.



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlineHanginOut From Austria, joined May 2005, 550 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 5139 times:

How many P-8s will the Australians acquire and how many P-3s do they currently have?

Quoting DEVILFISH (Reply 3):
the UN has an A320 in a similar configuration?

???  confused 

The UN do not have any aircraft. The aircraft that they use are either leased by the UN, or Member States will operate their own equipment in UN colours for UN operations.



Dreaming of the day I can work for an airline
User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4938 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 5125 times:

Quoting HanginOut (Reply 4):
??? confused

That is why "Germany or" and a question mark was included in the question. Although I should have written NATO instead of UN.

Flightglobal has also picked up the story.....

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...-join-boeing-p-8-mma-progamme.html

[Edited 2007-07-20 21:12:47]


"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlineOzair From Australia, joined Jan 2005, 878 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 5069 times:

Quoting EBJ1248650 (Reply 2):
Would an update of their current P-3 Orions be a better option?

Nothing else was really an option and the P-3 airframe will have reached the point where it needs to be replaced. Rebuilds of old airframes are not the flavour of the month after the Seasprite debacle.

Quoting N328KF (Reply 1):
With that said, I'm sure fleet commonality with Wedgetail was a big contributory reason why this system was selected.

Don't forget the BBJs used by 34 SQN for VIP transport, although all the maintenance is leased out will still allow the aircrew to rotate round, certainly will be easier to retain the crews with more active postings available.

Quoting HanginOut (Reply 4):
How many P-8s will the Australians acquire and how many P-3s do they currently have?

Everything I have heard points to approx 8 frames being acquired to be used in concert with a Global Hawk purchase. I think they will hope for a greater fleet utilisation since we currently have 17 (I think) with two deployed to the Sandpit at any one time.

Quoting DEVILFISH (Thread starter):
Arguably, the P-8A may be the best currently on offer for this mission. It appears Boeing has got a tight grip on RAAF procurements. Hopefully, this would not be visited by the bugs that plagued their other sale to Australia.

Since we will acquire a program being procured by the US in large numbers we will be hamstrung by any issues that occur. Saying that I don't foresee any great problems with the purchase. What will be interesting is how the aircraft deal with our modifications, if the RAAF wish to match the capabilities of the AP-3C there will be quite a few modifications required for the airframe.

Boeing has several of the latest contracts but don't forgot Lockheed will get the JSF order when it occurs. That is significant enough to remove any angst. What is surprising is that we didn't join the SDD phase when we had the chance. Everyone knew we were going to choose the P-8, so why not get in and have a say in how it was going to be designed, allowing our industry to participate as well?

I think the 737 will be flying in one form or another till about 2060 now!


User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4938 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (6 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 4037 times:



Quoting Ozair (Reply 6):
What is surprising is that we didn't join the SDD phase when we had the chance. Everyone knew we were going to choose the P-8, so why not get in and have a say in how it was going to be designed, allowing our industry to participate as well?

Perhaps they're intending to accomplish that with one of the spiral developments?

Update:

Australia is still in negotiations for joining the program.....

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...-boeing-p-8-production-starts.html

Quote:
"Production of the first Boeing P-8A Poseidon has begun, as negotiations continue for Australia to join the US Navy's Multi-mission Maritime Aircraft programme. The 737 derivative is to replace the navy's Lockheed Martin P-3C Orions from 2013.

[.....]

Australia last July decided to join the MMA programme, and is negotiating a memorandum of understanding to participate in spiral development of the P-8. The first round of negotiations was completed in October and a second is planned for February, says Capt Mike Moran, the USN's P-8 integrated product team lead."



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Australia Picks Boeing P-8A MMA
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Boeing Completes MMA Wind Tunnel Tests posted Thu Apr 14 2005 00:36:25 by MidnightMike
Boeing Wins MMA posted Mon Jun 14 2004 22:57:47 by LMP737
Lockheed Or Boeing...MMA Contract? posted Tue Jun 8 2004 19:18:06 by Jmets18
Boeing Responds To Csar X Critics posted Wed Jul 11 2007 08:13:41 by Venus6971
Taiwan Selects Boeing AH-64D Over Bell AH-1Z posted Wed Jul 11 2007 04:19:10 by AirRyan
Boeing Wedgetail posted Wed Jul 4 2007 05:48:33 by Cancidas
Boeing Set To Extend C-17 Production At Own Risk posted Mon Jun 18 2007 03:34:00 by T773ER
Boeing VP Of Tanker Programs Csan Interview posted Wed May 30 2007 19:39:48 by 102IAHexpress
Boeing Confirms Further Delays For The 737 AEW&C posted Fri May 25 2007 14:00:21 by WINGS
Boeing 767 Tanker For Japan Flunks FAA Cert? posted Fri May 18 2007 14:14:05 by KhenleyDIA

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format