Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
New Patrol Aircraft For Canada?  
User currently offlineKrisYYZ From Canada, joined Nov 2004, 1593 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 5032 times:

The Canadian Forces currently operates 18 CP-140 Aurora aircraft for maritime, SAR and other operations. This aging fleet has been under going a multimillion-dollar upgrade program for the last decade that has been halted by the Canadian Government. A decision whether to purchase brand new patrol aircraft is expected before the end of this year.


Would the P-8 Poseidon be a realistic option for the CAF? Are there other aircraft that would meet the requirements?




KrisYYZ


http://www.edmontonsun.com/News/Canada/2007/09/21/4513891-sun.html

14 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29836 posts, RR: 58
Reply 1, posted (7 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 5015 times:

Quoting KrisYYZ (Thread starter):
Are there other aircraft that would meet the requirements?

Too bad you can't go the Argus rroute and have your own industry design a new airframe-in country-for the role...

Are the plans for the old CL-44 runnng around........Shorten it, slam some Allison 2100 engines on it...



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineEBJ1248650 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1932 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (7 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4939 times:

Quoting KrisYYZ (Thread starter):
Would the P-8 Poseidon be a realistic option for the CAF? Are there other aircraft that would meet the requirements?

P-8 would probably be a very good option. Nimrod is no longer in production (hasn't been for years); nor is P-3 Orion (though Lockheed at one point had a new variant called the P-7 that was in competition with a 757 based patrol plane. Neither bird was produced -- lack of funding killed the project, I believe.)

I have to wonder if Airbus has considered an ASW variant of one of its planes; A320 perhaps?



Dare to dream; dream big!
User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4952 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (7 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 4920 times:

Quoting EBJ1248650 (Reply 2):
I have to wonder if Airbus has considered an ASW variant of one of its planes; A320 perhaps?

Wonder no more.....

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...-a319-with-bomb-bay-doors-for.html



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlineColumba From Germany, joined Dec 2004, 7089 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (7 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 4911 times:

Quoting L-188 (Reply 1):
Too bad you can't go the Argus rroute and have your own industry design a new airframe-in country-for the role...

Maybe the C-Series  Wink

Quoting EBJ1248650 (Reply 2):
I have to wonder if Airbus has considered an ASW variant of one of its planes; A320 perhaps?

They offered an A320 MPA to Italy and Germany. Germany bought second hand from the Netherlands.



It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
User currently offlineMDorBust From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (7 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 4906 times:

Are the Japanese still prohibited from selling their new patrol aircraft to foreign governments?

User currently offlineKrisYYZ From Canada, joined Nov 2004, 1593 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (7 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 4881 times:

Quoting DEVILFISH (Reply 3):
Wonder no more.....

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles....html

I had no idea such concept even existed.

I would bet that the current Canadian government would be more inclined to order the P-8 than the Airbus ASW aircraft.

KrisYYZ


User currently offlineColumba From Germany, joined Dec 2004, 7089 posts, RR: 4
Reply 7, posted (7 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 4874 times:

Quoting KrisYYZ (Reply 6):
I would bet that the current Canadian government would be more inclined to order the P-8 than the Airbus ASW aircraft.

From the article:

"Several other countries – including Australia, Canada and France – have expressed interest in the aircraft"



It will forever be a McDonnell Douglas MD 80 , Boeing MD 80 sounds so wrong
User currently offlineMissedApproach From Canada, joined Oct 2004, 713 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (7 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 4814 times:

Quoting L-188 (Reply 1):
Too bad you can't go the Argus route and have your own industry design a new airframe-in country-for the role...

Are the plans for the old CL-44 running around........Shorten it, slam some Allison 2100 engines on it...

Hey, those are almost the same airplane. The Argus was based on the Bristol Britannia, while the CL-44 Yukon was based on...the Bristol Britannia. Radial engines were used on the Argus due to a lower fuel consumption.


There's no telling what is happening in Ottawa with this. They may be looking at UAV's, they may be after a Dash-8 derivative, they may jump onboard the P-8 program. It depends on what the expected mission is. Traditionally the CP-140 has done training for ASW, offshore fisheries patrols, arctic sovereignty & environmental assessment patrols, & SAR support missions. If they still want to do all those missions with one airplane, they will need something fairly large to give the range & payload performance they need.




Can you hear me now?
User currently offlineEBJ1248650 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1932 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (7 years 2 months 4 weeks 11 hours ago) and read 4715 times:

Quoting MissedApproach (Reply 8):
There's no telling what is happening in Ottawa with this. They may be looking at UAV's, they may be after a Dash-8 derivative, they may jump onboard the P-8 program. It depends on what the expected mission is. Traditionally the CP-140 has done training for ASW, offshore fisheries patrols, arctic sovereignty & environmental assessment patrols, & SAR support missions. If they still want to do all those missions with one airplane, they will need something fairly large to give the range & payload performance they need.

You make a good point. But what's available in the size and performance category you'd be describing? And would there be enough of a market for such airplanes to warrant a competition to produce one? Boeing ASW 757 proposal comes to mind, again, but I don't believe they'd pursue it because it would compete, to some degree, with the P-8.



Dare to dream; dream big!
User currently offlineMissedApproach From Canada, joined Oct 2004, 713 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (7 years 2 months 3 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 4558 times:

Well, I would say the P-8/737 is as large as Canada would go. It has the range performance that would be required for arctic patrols. I think Yellowknife & Iqaluit are as far North as you can go in Canada & find a paved runway. There are 5000 foot strips farther North, but I believe they are all gravel.
The CP-140/P-3 is perfectly suited to long range patrol missions, but we tend to put really huge hours on all of our equipment, & I imagine that's at the root of this.



Can you hear me now?
User currently offlineMissedApproach From Canada, joined Oct 2004, 713 posts, RR: 2
Reply 11, posted (7 years 3 weeks 3 days 10 hours ago) and read 4217 times:



Quoting KrisYYZ (Thread starter):
uld the P-8 Poseidon be a realistic option for the CAF?

Apparently, the answer is "yes". From CanWest News Service:

The Canadian military is recommending that a $1-billion modernization program for the country's fleet of Aurora surveillance aircraft be scrapped and the air force ease back on how it uses the planes so they can be kept flying until a replacement is delivered. The military argues it doesn't make sense to pump more money into the 25-year-old Auroras, noting that by the time the modernized planes are ready, even more advanced technology will be available. There are also concerns about the extent of the structural problems now facing the Auroras.
The military's recommendation is to keep the Auroras flying until 2016 without upgrades while proceeding with the purchase of Poseidon surveillance aircraft, the U.S. navy's successor to its version of the Aurora. Several years ago, Canada was invited by the U.S. to take part in the Poseidon program, but declined.



Can you hear me now?
User currently offlineConnies4ever From Canada, joined Feb 2006, 4066 posts, RR: 13
Reply 12, posted (7 years 3 weeks 3 days ago) and read 4106 times:



Quoting KrisYYZ (Thread starter):

Would the P-8 Poseidon be a realistic option for the CAF? Are there other aircraft that would meet the requirements?


It would be and there are other a/c being considered for the surveillance role:

http://www.sfu.ca/casr/bg-cp140-replacement.htm

The site overall is a useful source of information re Canadian Forces.



Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
User currently offlineScouseflyer From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2006, 3403 posts, RR: 9
Reply 13, posted (7 years 3 weeks 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 4084 times:



Quoting EBJ1248650 (Reply 2):
Nimrod is no longer in production (hasn't been for years);

Remarkably it nearly was back in production as new plane a few years back - the MR4A version of the Nimrod that is in production by BAe only carries over 5% of the donor aircraft and BAe offered a solution whereby an entirely new aircraft was created this wasn't taken up though - which is a shame for BAe as they later found that the manufacturing tollerances on the recovered fusealages were so poor that each set of wings had to altered to make it fit!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawker_Siddeley_Nimrod#MRA4


User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13253 posts, RR: 77
Reply 14, posted (7 years 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 4042 times:

Nimrod would be too expensive, but the upgraded MRA.4 are effectively new aircraft (they ger new serials after conversion), since only the fuselage pressure shell is original, everything else, inside and out, is new.
BAe sold this as a upgrade/conversion to get the contract, the Treasury always think that 'upgrade' is much cheaper than buying new.
They have also said they could produce entirely new aircraft, which as it turns out, would have been a lot quicker and cheaper.

But Canada I guess will go with P-8, plugging into that much larger programme with the big USN order and it's economies of scale.
With Canada stressing issues over the Arctic, with the absurd underwater posturing by that secret policeman in the Kremlin, I seriously doubt Canada is going to skimp on such a vital asset.
So unlikely Canada will get some turboprop commuter liner converted for maritime patrol, Canada's needs cover a vast area and face potentially sophisticated threats.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic New Patrol Aircraft For Canada?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
New Stealth Aircraft Under Contract For Usaf posted Sat Jun 24 2006 23:05:17 by RichardPrice
New Aircraft For The New Nato Countries posted Mon Mar 29 2004 20:55:09 by Vio
"new" C130 For The Belgium Airforce posted Tue Apr 10 2007 19:47:35 by HeliflyerPDC
New Support Helicopters For The RAF posted Sat Mar 31 2007 00:51:48 by GDB
F-15K -- Options For Canada, Australia? posted Tue Sep 5 2006 02:23:18 by AerospaceFan
USN To Ground All Aircraft For One Day posted Sat Mar 4 2006 16:43:03 by AviationAddict
New Bomber Plans For USAF, J-UCAS Cancelled. posted Mon Jan 16 2006 22:39:21 by CX747
New VIP Aircrafts For The German Goverment posted Sun Jan 15 2006 13:51:15 by Columba
New Navy Aircraft posted Tue Oct 25 2005 08:40:37 by Sean1234
Chartered Aircraft For Soldiers In Cuba? posted Sat Aug 6 2005 20:33:40 by USAir330

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format