Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
MV Vs CV-22 Designation  
User currently offlineKevinSmith From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (6 years 10 months 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 6016 times:

Why is it that the Marines chose to designate their Ospreys as MV-22 and the the Air Force CV-22s. It occurs to me that the Air Force is going to use theirs for more special ops than cargo, and vice versa for the Marine Corp.

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCurt22 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 335 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (6 years 10 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 5935 times:

Quoting KevinSmith (Thread starter):
Why is it that the Marines chose to designate their Ospreys as MV-22 and the the Air Force CV-22s. It occurs to me that the Air Force is going to use theirs for more special ops than cargo, and vice versa for the Marine Corp.

Your a smart guy!

Marines do fly MH-53E's while the USAF flies SOF MH-53M and MC-130 acft..for some reason they jumped on the M-Preface...seems they either wish to ignore this is the SOF designation or they wish to pretend they are flying a SOF acft.

For now, I think the USAF is happy to keep the CV-22 MDS to distance themselves from the USMC, but I suspect someday others will ask your same question and we'll see MV-22 A (USMC) and MV-22B (USAF) acft


User currently offlineStudedave From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 485 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (6 years 10 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 5880 times:

The letter 'M' stands for multi-mission. Other examples would include 'MH-60S' and 'MH-60R'...


Classic planes, Classic trains, and Studebakers~~ what else is there???
User currently offlineKevinSmith From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (6 years 10 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 5857 times:

Quoting Studedave (Reply 2):
The letter 'M' stands for multi-mission. Other examples would include 'MH-60S' and 'MH-60R'...

I see. Still begs the question as to why the Air Force chose "C" when it is going to be doing "M".


User currently offlineStudeDave From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 485 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (6 years 10 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 5831 times:

Quoting KevinSmith (Reply 3):
Still begs the question as to why the Air Force chose "C" when it is going to be doing "M".

Got me!!! They do tend to 'march' to a different beat from time to time...

Then again- let's think about the MH60S for a second. It was originally supposed to be 'CH-60S'~ and then the totally mission changed. Was that the case with the bird in question? I don't know. The AF Recruiter was at lunch 19 years ago when he told me to be at his office, and I ended up joining the NAVY instead!!! Shame about that...



Classic planes, Classic trains, and Studebakers~~ what else is there???
User currently offlineRotorImage From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 40 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (6 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 5786 times:

Quoting StudeDave (Reply 4):
Got me!!! They do tend to 'march' to a different beat from time to time...

Ok....just to clear this all up, because this is an issue that is near and dear to me.

The Air Force didn't "choose" the CV designation. Showing complete disregard for the MDS-designation system that has worked so well for many years, [where M denotes special operations/multi-mission and C is cargo] the USMC decided that since they were the lead service for development of the aircraft, the aircraft would carry an "M," just to designate that it was a Marine bird. It makes no sense at all, but I think with all of the press the aircraft has gotten, they just wanted to make sure that when folks think of the Osprey, they associate it with the Marines. This is pure service arrogance on the part of the USMC, plain and simple. The way the aircraft will be employed by the Marines is completely different from the role it will fill for SOCOM. For the Marines, it's a one-for-one replacement of the CH-46, and will bear the burden for filling the roles and responsibities that aircraft has shouldered for so long...Once again, since it's replacing a "CH"-46, choosing to denote the Marine model as the "MV" is just dumb.

Quoting Curt22 (Reply 1):
Marines do fly MH-53E's while the USAF flies SOF MH-53M and MC-130 acft

Also, for the record, there are no "MH"-53s, of any type, in the USMC. The MH-53E [Sea Dragon] is specific to the USN, and the MH-53J/M is only in the AF. Although those two designations look similar, the roles (and airframes themselves) are completely different...The Sea Dragon is a mine-sweeper based on the Super Stallion, whereas the PAVE LOW is pure special ops based on the smaller Sea Stallion. All 53's in the Marine corps are CHs - the overwhelming majority of which are the larger E model (Super Stallion), with only a few D models (Sea Stallion) still around.

Shoot me questions if you got 'em.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic MV Vs CV-22 Designation
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
CV-22/MV-22 Starting To Look For Crews posted Sat Apr 16 2005 17:29:50 by Galaxy5
Marines Temporarily Ground MV-22 Fleet posted Fri Feb 9 2007 19:45:16 by DfwRevolution
MV-22 Osprey Dual Flameout Emergency Procedures posted Fri Jan 5 2007 00:46:06 by 2H4
CV Vs CVN posted Wed May 24 2006 23:08:14 by 747400sp
F-22 Vs. Eurofighter posted Sat May 17 2003 04:14:57 by Charleslp
Yf-23 Vs F-22 posted Mon Sep 10 2001 19:47:06 by Fireblade
V-22 Osprey - Best Alternatives To It? posted Sun Sep 30 2007 21:15:11 by Flighty
F-22 Overseas Basing posted Tue Sep 11 2007 18:38:57 by EBJ1248650
Anybody See "Weeds" Monday? F-22? posted Wed Sep 5 2007 15:26:34 by DeltaDC9
V-22 Flying At AZA (IWA) Today posted Tue Aug 7 2007 19:53:20 by FlyAZA

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format