Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Could Airbus Design An A380 Size Cargo Jet?  
User currently online747400sp From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3579 posts, RR: 2
Posted (6 years 10 months 13 hours ago) and read 5446 times:

With the USAF looking at the A380 as a C-5 replacement, you could say USAF would consider Airbus in their fleet. For some time now, I wonder if Airbus could design a cargo jet base up on an A400 design enlarge to an A380 size. Being an American in active duty service, I did not feel right about posting a ideal for Airbus. Now that the USAF is looking to Airbus for replacement for AF-1, E-4s and C-5s, I feel conferable with this ideal. So could Airbus build a cargo jet using an A380 size A400 design with A380 or new engines?

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineA342 From Germany, joined Jul 2005, 4681 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (6 years 10 months 12 hours ago) and read 5427 times:

Sure they could, but it's quite unrealistic. Even if European air forces wanted such an aircraft, I suspect modernised An-124s would be more likely.


Exceptions confirm the rule.
User currently onlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 30861 posts, RR: 86
Reply 2, posted (6 years 10 months 10 hours ago) and read 5406 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting 747400sp (Thread starter):
So could Airbus build a cargo jet using an A380 size A400 design with A380 or new engines?

I see no reason why not, but as noted, the Russians already have such designs and with Western technology infusions, could be made even more effective.


User currently offlineDougloid From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (6 years 10 months 10 hours ago) and read 5404 times:

I'd like to be able to see it fly in my lifetime.

User currently offlineEBJ1248650 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1932 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (6 years 10 months 8 hours ago) and read 5340 times:

Quoting Stitch (Reply 2):
I see no reason why not, but as noted, the Russians already have such designs and with Western technology infusions, could be made even more effective.

Airbus could surely design such an airplane, but then so could Boeing and Lockheed-Martin. It wouldn't come as a big surprise to see a specification written up and issued to all three. Boeing would likely be favored since it's US based and is building big jets. That wouldn't make them the automatic winner though.

The big question would be whether it would be worthwhile for Airbus to put the effort into designing such an airplane when so few air forces would have the money to buy it. RAF wouldn't; C-17A seems to be big enough for them ... and within their budget. Production run of the new airplane would likely be less than 100 machines.



Dare to dream; dream big!
User currently offlineDL767captain From United States of America, joined Mar 2007, 2539 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (6 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 5263 times:

i don't understand how the A380 could be a C-5 replacement, its not the same type of plane, the A380 at most would be suitable for the A380F hauling packages around, not carrying tanks. If Airbus made something like a C-17 that would make more sense, but I can't see a passenger jet as a military cargo plane, it just doesn't make sense, there would probably need to be a lot of changes made to the A380

User currently onlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 30861 posts, RR: 86
Reply 6, posted (6 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 5193 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting DL767captain (Reply 5):
i don't understand how the A380 could be a C-5 replacement...

It can't.

On paper, it offers more payload lift (by 30mt) and doubles the range (10000km vs 4500km), however it is restricted to "freight industry" pallets and LD3 containers and cannot take anything like the variety of cargo the C-5 can.

The 747-8F would offer more flexibility in terms of outsize and non-standard cargo and would itself offer more payload (by 20mt) and range (another 3000km or so), but it too cannot offer the same flexibility in load-out nor can it be loaded with wheeled and tracked vehicles as easily (though far easier then the A380F).

The C-5M program boosts payload to close to that of the 747-8F and A380F and improves the range (I can't find a specific number, but it is said to be in the area of 30% so figure around 6000km).


User currently offlineMD11Engineer From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 13985 posts, RR: 62
Reply 7, posted (6 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 5170 times:

We are talking about a plane like the C-5A or the AN-124 designed to the size of an A-380, not a military version of the A-380.

Jan


User currently onlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 30861 posts, RR: 86
Reply 8, posted (6 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 5147 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Well it does tie into the discussion we're having here - US Considers A380 As AF1 And C-5 Replacement! (by LifelinerOne Oct 17 2007 in Military Aviation & Space Flight)

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Could Airbus Design An A380 Size Cargo Jet?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
AF1 Has An Entrance By Cargo?(Pic) posted Sat Mar 4 2006 21:59:13 by JrMafia90
Libyan Air Cargo AN-124s posted Mon Sep 25 2006 21:45:17 by Cruisertk421
Why RAF Never Design Or Build A Jet posted Mon May 8 2006 02:25:14 by 747400sp
Could An ME262 Wax An F86? posted Tue Apr 25 2006 12:47:25 by ThirtyEcho
A380, US Military Cargo posted Mon Nov 14 2005 22:10:25 by 777D
Airbus To Decide By June 23 On Jet Plant, Tanker posted Mon May 23 2005 23:23:34 by Keesje
Boeing Doing 'An Airbus' With Its JSF? posted Tue May 13 2003 20:54:00 by Ammunition
Spaceplane By 2012, Could It Happen? posted Sun Sep 23 2007 03:35:53 by 747400sp
Turkish Military Jet Crash In Western Turkey posted Fri Sep 21 2007 17:50:38 by Stickers
South African Built Jet Fighter posted Wed Sep 5 2007 02:16:52 by Jafa39
Can Anyone Buy An Old Used Fighter Jet? posted Sat Nov 6 2010 09:14:00 by varigb707
Did The Ussr Every Design An Answer To The C-17? posted Sat Dec 30 2006 05:48:24 by 747400sp
AF1 Has An Entrance By Cargo?(Pic) posted Sat Mar 4 2006 21:59:13 by JrMafia90
How Low Could An (Over-Water) B-52 Go? posted Wed Apr 23 2008 11:45:14 by GDB
An Iranian Military Jet Crashes Near Tehran posted Tue Apr 15 2008 00:01:09 by Beaucaire
Libyan Air Cargo AN-124s posted Mon Sep 25 2006 21:45:17 by Cruisertk421
Why RAF Never Design Or Build A Jet posted Mon May 8 2006 02:25:14 by 747400sp
Could An ME262 Wax An F86? posted Tue Apr 25 2006 12:47:25 by ThirtyEcho
A380, US Military Cargo posted Mon Nov 14 2005 22:10:25 by 777D
Airbus To Decide By June 23 On Jet Plant, Tanker posted Mon May 23 2005 23:23:34 by Keesje

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format