Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
B-1/Tu-160 Wing/Body Glove Question  
User currently offlineBlackbird From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (6 years 9 months 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 3145 times:

How does such a thick wing-body gloves used on the B-1 and Tu-160 manage to not produce large amounts of drag at supersonic speed?

I understand that you can get away with blunt LE's on a supersonic plane if it's swept back enough, but still those are THICK at least from what I remember, particularly the Tu-160...


Andrea Kent

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGlideslope From United States of America, joined May 2004, 1612 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (6 years 9 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3111 times:

I think all they can do is move the glove design as far outboard in relation to the airframe centerline. Thus reducing the subsonic/transonic drag as much as possible. The rest is four General Electric F-101-GE-102 turbofan engines in re-heat, or 4 HK-32 turbojets.


To know your Enemy, you must become your Enemy.” Sun Tzu
User currently offlineN74JW From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (6 years 9 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3099 times:

At supersonic speed, the aircraft is in front, almost outside of the shock-cone. The wing-tips, and empennage drag the airflow through the slip-stream. Transonic, the airframe has pierced the shock-cone, but has not made it through. Subsonic speeds have the nose of the aircraft hitting the front of the shock-cone, and experiencing the most drag. Airflow spills over the top of the fuselage then waves down the wing-body gloves as it moves aft. I have never seen a B-1 shape in a wind tunnel, but I am quite certain that is how the airflow would move.

My 2c


User currently offlineBlackbird From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (6 years 9 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2894 times:

N747JW,

Huh? At supersonic speed, the plane would have the shockwave off the nose, and a shockwave at the tail last I remembered...

Andrea Kent


User currently offlineN74JW From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (6 years 9 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2887 times:

That's what I remember from class. Supersonic = airplane through the shock-cone, tail in the back.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Andreas Zeitler - Flying-Wings



This fella is transonic, quickly approaching supersonic.


User currently offlineBlackbird From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (6 years 9 months 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2848 times:

Not exactly... as you go transonic the flow accelerates to supersonic speed then slows down forming a shockwave... as the plane goes faster and faster, the supersonic-flow covers more distance forward and aft with the shockwave travelling aft. Once Mach 1 is achieved, the shockwave reaches the tailcone, and a shockwave forms at the nose which is a flat wall shape.

Above Mach 1, the shockwave bends back like a cone at increasingly swept angles as the mach number goes up. Eventually as the shockwave sweeps back far enough, the flow goes subsonic behind the shockwave, and the flow tends to take a bow-shape with the pressure wave detatching from the nose.

Andrea Kent


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic B-1/Tu-160 Wing/Body Glove Question
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
B1 A Copy Of TU-160 Or Vice Versa? posted Mon Feb 5 2007 05:23:05 by ElpinDAB
Tu 160 Use... posted Mon Nov 20 2006 19:32:39 by Waterpolodan
Tu-160 Bomber Crashes In Russia posted Mon Sep 22 2003 23:34:32 by Tu144d
U.S.A.F Squadron/Wing Question posted Tue Nov 7 2006 23:03:55 by Tiger119
89th Airlift Wing Fleet Question posted Thu Jul 8 2004 17:54:59 by FlagshipAZ
French Air Force C-130 At SJO Question posted Wed Nov 28 2007 18:38:00 by LTU932
Question: P-3C Hardpoints posted Mon Nov 19 2007 13:23:19 by PADSpot
Question About This Pic posted Tue Nov 6 2007 12:02:06 by Sprout5199
Tu 22 " Backfire " 22M In Attack Mode Near Norway posted Wed Oct 10 2007 21:40:21 by Mortyman
E-2 Hawkeye Question/Video posted Thu Sep 27 2007 05:30:32 by DeltaGuy

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format