Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Red Arrows Too British For 2012 Olympics?  
User currently offlineSean377 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 1225 posts, RR: 40
Posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 3384 times:

Thought this may interest some of you...

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk:80/RedArrows2012/?ref=redArrows2012

Petition Creator...

The Department of Culture, Media and Sport have deemed the RAF Red Arrows as Unsuitable for the 2012 Olympics because they are too British.

This is a ridiculous decision and should be overturned in the name of common sense.

Governments response...

This allegation is not true. The Government has not banned the Red Arrows from the London 2012 Olympic Games. The organising committee of London 2012 will decide what to include in the Opening Ceremony and other celebrations - but with almost five years to go, decisions are yet to be made on what these will look like.

And of course the Red Arrows played a memorable role in the celebrations for 2012, when they flew over Trafalgar Square to mark London winning the Games.


Flying is the second greatest thrill known to man... Landing is the first!
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTheSonntag From Germany, joined Jun 2005, 3570 posts, RR: 29
Reply 1, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 3306 times:

Nothing against the Red Arrows, but somehow I do think it is time to focus olympic game back on what they should be all about: Sports.

I mean, we will certainly get the worst show this year in Beijing since Berlin 1936 (or maybe Moscow 1980 and L.A. 1984, although they were not that bad).

The Red Arrows are certainly cool, but I just hope the show will focus on Olympics. It is sad to see that Olympic games have once again turned out to be propaganda shows.


User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29795 posts, RR: 58
Reply 2, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 3301 times:



Quoting TheSonntag (Reply 1):
but somehow I do think it is time to focus olympic game back on what they should be all about: Sports.

They haven't been focused on sports since Mexico City. Face it, Munich was the terror games, Moscow where the Afghanistan games, and they are commercial games since LA.

Quoting TheSonntag (Reply 1):
I mean, we will certainly get the worst show this year in Beijing since Berlin 1936 (or maybe Moscow 1980 and L.A. 1984, although they were not that bad).

Yeah, did you just see the IOC put out a statement pleading with countries not to boycot Beijing because of Tibet?

Then you have that Marathoner who had decided to drop out due to the life-threatening air pollution in Beijing.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineDavid L From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 9524 posts, RR: 42
Reply 3, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 3294 times:



Quoting TheSonntag (Reply 1):
Nothing against the Red Arrows, but somehow I do think it is time to focus olympic game back on what they should be all about: Sports.

I don't think anyone's suggesting the Red Arrows should buzz around during the events, distracting everyone from the games. In any case, it looks like another of these allegations that/s been invented out of thin air.


User currently offlineMoo From Falkland Islands, joined May 2007, 3925 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 3243 times:



Quoting Sean377 (Thread starter):
The Department of Culture, Media and Sport have deemed the RAF Red Arrows as Unsuitable for the 2012 Olympics because they are too British.

Pretty much exactly the same bullshit as that petition a year or so ago alleging that the PM's office had sanctioned the dissolution of the Red Arrows.

Quoting Sean377 (Thread starter):
This allegation is not true.

Wow. And exactly the same response.

Anyone else fed up with the fact that the 10 Downing Street petition website has become a foundation for fearmongers, anti-government feelings, rumours and the ilk?


User currently offlineHighlander0 From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2007, 165 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (6 years 5 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 3210 times:

We get these sort of topics every year on other forums.

Quoting Moo (Reply 4):
Anyone else fed up with the fact that the 10 Downing Street petition website has become a foundation for fearmongers, anti-government feelings, rumours and the ilk?

Pretty much


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Red Arrows Too British For 2012 Olympics?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Red Arrows New A/c ;) posted Sun Sep 2 2007 22:58:37 by Leezyjet
Riat 2007 - Red Arrows Vs Thunderbirds posted Sun Jul 15 2007 12:58:53 by A320ajm
Save The Red Arrows posted Thu Feb 8 2007 17:25:59 by Leezyjet
Red Arrows In Mid - Air Collision posted Fri Jan 12 2007 17:31:12 by EZYAirbus
Red Arrows Reg? posted Sun Dec 10 2006 14:06:44 by AirbusA346
New Jets Too Heavy For Take Off posted Sun May 16 2004 11:56:22 by EZYAirbus
Looking For The Red Flag Accident Video posted Fri Oct 20 2006 21:35:14 by RichardPrice
Super Hornets For Bulgaria? (F-5's Too!) posted Fri Mar 24 2006 04:26:57 by AirRyan
Finding A Name For The KC-45 posted Thu Mar 13 2008 11:44:32 by CFMitch56
Dems & Boeing Supporters Blame McCain For KC-45 posted Sat Mar 8 2008 18:50:24 by Mike89406

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format