Checksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 996 posts, RR: 0 Posted (5 years 2 months 1 week 12 hours ago) and read 6162 times:
Just saw this over at af.mil on the video news. They are going to start testing the NP2000 prop on the C-130 in support of the NY ANG ops on snow. This will be interesting to follow.
Checksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 996 posts, RR: 0 Reply 4, posted (5 years 2 months 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 5971 times:
Quoting Fridgmus (Reply 1): Checksixx, what is the NP 2000 prop? How many blades does it have? You know, the usual questions for us folk who don't know!
I'm guessing that you couldn't watch the video. It is an eight bladed prop that is currently only used on the E-2C Hawkeye. Flight testing begins in April.
Fridgmus From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 1383 posts, RR: 11 Reply 7, posted (5 years 2 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 5908 times:
Checksixx and Zeke, Thank You both!
No, I could not access the video. My company blocks a lot stuff due to bandwidth issues over here.
Eight blades huh, Sexy!!! (I got a thing for turboprops!)
F
The Lockheed Super Constellation, the REAL Queen of the Skies!
Checksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 996 posts, RR: 0 Reply 8, posted (5 years 2 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 5893 times:
Yeah its pretty cool! A company out of Ohio has already been flying aircraft with it installed, however, there has been no Air Force testing of the prop until now. Could be a significant performance increase!
Zeke From Hong Kong, joined Dec 2006, 7725 posts, RR: 73 Reply 9, posted (5 years 2 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 5882 times:
Quoting Checksixx (Reply 6): As I said, flight testing begins in April...nice picture though.
I was trying to make the subtle point that on the Snow Aviation site, they say they have already commence flight testing. http://www.snowaviation.com/current.htm
We are addicted to our thoughts. We cannot change anything if we cannot change our thinking – Santosh Kalwar
Vzlet From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 820 posts, RR: 0 Reply 11, posted (5 years 2 months 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 5857 times:
From Snow's website: "The key to this exciting project is thrust. This increased thrust will be provided to the Hercules through two very significant modifications. These modifications will include the addition of modern, high-technology propellers and additional turbofan engines along with other related airframe modifications to support the power plant upgrades."
Additional turbofans???
"That's so stupid! If they're so secret, why are they out where everyone can see them?" - my kid
Checksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 996 posts, RR: 0 Reply 14, posted (5 years 2 months 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 5759 times:
Checksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 996 posts, RR: 0 Reply 16, posted (5 years 2 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 5628 times:
Quoting Zeke (Reply 15): You never stated "Air Force testing" above.
Hmm...how would you interpret reply number 8 then?
Checksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 996 posts, RR: 0 Reply 18, posted (5 years 2 months 5 days 18 hours ago) and read 5607 times:
Quoting Checksixx (Reply 8): Yeah its pretty cool! A company out of Ohio has already been flying aircraft with it installed, however, there has been no Air Force testing of the prop until now. Could be a significant performance increase!
This is reply 8. Company out of Ohio...Snow Aviation.
Checksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 996 posts, RR: 0 Reply 19, posted (5 years 2 months 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 5570 times:
Just received a PM from Zeke and its clear that he's having difficulty understanding this thread, so let me break it down.
If anyone reads my post at the top and heads over to www.af.mil and then looks through the video news, you'll see a video titled "Blade Drop". When/if you watch it they state that Air Force flight testing of the NP2000 prop on the C-130 will begin in April.
Now Snow Aviation has been mentioned in this thread several times. They have done their own independant testing of this configuration. They were/are not conduction this testing for the Air Force in any capacity. Hope this clears things up for those that may have gotten confused here.
Checksixx From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 996 posts, RR: 0 Reply 20, posted (5 years 2 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 5426 times:
Articles after a very brief search I found the following support/reference articles...enjoy: