Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
RAF To Celebrate 90 Years Of Service  
User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13186 posts, RR: 77
Posted (6 years 5 months 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 3244 times:

1st April 2008 marks 90 years since the Army Royal Flying Corps and the Royal Naval Air Service merged, to create the world's first truly independent air arm.
As you might expect this event will be marked, including a flypast over London;
http://www.raf.mod.uk/news/index.cfm...CA67B98-1143-EC82-2E89A277AD340ED3

Three days ago, the last surviving RNAS/RAF (and I think British WW1) veteran, 111 year old Henry Allingham, was invited as a guest at the announcement of the events to mark this anniversary.
http://www.raf.mod.uk/news/index.cfm...6856F6A-1143-EC82-2EE41253BCA76C24

It will be a major feature of the Air Tattoo this summer, (though actual numbers of aircraft could be affected by the service being so heavily deployed on operations, in other words, delivering what the taxpayer funds).

Air Net member Black Projects has some NOTAM info on the flypast.

This page has 7 chapters of illustrated pdf's, on the history of the RAF;
http://www.raf.mod.uk/history/

Edit-Added history link.

[Edited 2008-03-21 10:31:30]

16 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBlackProjects From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2007, 756 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (6 years 5 months 6 days ago) and read 3228 times:

The NOTAM as mentioned by GDB above.

Also due to take part are the RAF RED ARROWS and the Battle of Britain Memorial Flight but which aircraft apart from a Spitfire thats said to be operating out of RAF Brize Norton is un-known.


CEREMONIAL FLYPAST AT 5136N 00014W (RAF MUSEUM - LONDON) BY 9 TYPHOON ACFT. FORMATION WILL ROUTE 5145N 00135W (RAF BRIZE NORTON APRX 1753 HRS) - 5134N 00045W (COOKHAM DEAN APRX 1758 HRS) - 5136N
00014W (RAF MUSEUM 1801 HRS). AFTER FLYPAST THE FORMATION WILL ROUTE 5145N 00007W (BROOKMANS PARK BPK APRX 1803HRS) - 5159N
00004E(BARKWAY BKY APRX 1806 HRS). FORMATION WILL THEN RECOVER TO RAF CONINGSBY

 alert   alert   old 


User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12134 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (6 years 5 months 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 3181 times:

Congrads to our brothers in the UK.

User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 3, posted (6 years 5 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 3147 times:



Quoting GDB (Thread starter):
1st April 2008 marks 90 years since the Army Royal Flying Corps and the Royal Naval Air Service merged, to create the world's first truly independent air arm.

I guess we should be gracious and not carp that it was a bloody awful decision, shouldn't we?  Wink



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13186 posts, RR: 77
Reply 4, posted (6 years 5 months 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 3145 times:



Quoting Banco (Reply 3):
I guess we should be gracious and not carp that it was a bloody awful decision, shouldn't we?

I don't blame them for this in 1918, who really knew what the potential of sea based air power was then, aside from observation.
Certainly not the Admirals, they were probably glad to be shot of worrying too much about these little, frail aircraft, what were they compared to a broadside from a Battleship?

But by the early/mid 1930's, policy should have changed, should have changed when the RN started planning and building purpose built carriers at this time, the first to do so in fact.
As well as naval aviation technology becoming more reliable and potent, able to do stuff like dive bomb and carry torpedo's over increasing distances.


User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 5, posted (6 years 5 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 3115 times:



Quoting GDB (Reply 4):
I don't blame them for this in 1918, who really knew what the potential of sea based air power was then, aside from observation.
Certainly not the Admirals, they were probably glad to be shot of worrying too much about these little, frail aircraft, what were they compared to a broadside from a Battleship?

A little bit harsh, actually. Do remember that the RN was the world leader in naval aviation at the time. That they regressed dramatically from the moment they lost control of their aviation branch is hardly surprising. Given the RAF's refusal to hand over any degree of autonomy to the navy it is hardly surprising that innovation ossified and the navy concentrated on battleships.



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently offlineWrighbrothers From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2005, 1875 posts, RR: 9
Reply 6, posted (6 years 5 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 3109 times:

Was a really bad April fools day joke that someone took seriously  Wink

In all seriousness, well done to the RAF, they provide an invaluable support to the troops out on the front line and keep the supplies coming, they're also good for providing squaddies with someone to blame everything on when they have to go by four tonner to a training exercise instead of a Chinook  Wink

Wrighbrothers



Always stand up for what is right, even if it means standing alone..
User currently offlineConnies4ever From Canada, joined Feb 2006, 4066 posts, RR: 13
Reply 7, posted (6 years 5 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3100 times:

Hopefully the Vulcan can participate in the Tattoo.

The decision taken then was an expedient that had unforeseen consequences, fortunately the RN was ultimately permitted a degree of air power with the Fleet Air Arm.

Jon Lake has written an excellent two-part critique of the RAF and MoD that have appeared in the past two issues of "AIR International" -- recommended to all. Suffice to say Mr Lake is not a fan of the Whitehall types in MoD.

That said, congratulations to the RAF on reaching 90. Per ardua ad astra.



Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13186 posts, RR: 77
Reply 8, posted (6 years 5 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3099 times:

I was harsh about the Admirals, but I don't blame them, at least until the potential of aviation became clearer, Billy Mitchell's demostration in the 1920's should have concertrated minds beyond the Admiralty though.
The RAF, due to it's history, is quite unusual in doing maritime patrolo-most others let the Navy do it, as well as support helicopters, with most Army air arms do.
However, there is no case for changing this now, the armed forces have had quite enough 're-structuring'.
If they are sometimes found wanting in say, support helicopter provision, it's down to having too few, as Flight International reported-about both Army and RAF choppers, in 1986!


User currently offlineBlackProjects From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2007, 756 posts, RR: 3
Reply 9, posted (6 years 5 months 21 hours ago) and read 2994 times:

A second RAF Flypast will be heading East to West up the River Thames to be at the London Eye(Big Wheel) by 1PM local time on April the 1st.

It will comprise The Red Arrows and 4 RAF Euro Fighters.


User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13186 posts, RR: 77
Reply 10, posted (6 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2899 times:

On the day itself, here are some amateur vids of the flypast;

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=bG5otF9Hcuw

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=7LVLFmmJhLo

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=iMtcrUUySjU

[Edited 2008-04-01 10:24:50]

[Edited 2008-04-01 10:29:19]

User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4798 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (6 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 2856 times:

A pity this anniversary  present  gift would be a week late in joining the celebrations.....

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...ive-fifth-c-17-transport-next.html



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlineFreckles From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2007, 386 posts, RR: 8
Reply 12, posted (6 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2844 times:

We had about 10 or so (maybe more) jets (not the red arrows) flying in formation very low and slow over Maidenhead, nr Windsor at about 18:50 tonight.

Was quite a spectacle!

Morgan


User currently offlineBlackProjects From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2007, 756 posts, RR: 3
Reply 13, posted (6 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2826 times:

The 10+ actualey 11 Typhoons were going to The RAF Museum Hendon for aFlypast being held as a Large Slap up Dinner was being held at the museum to Celebrate the RAF 90th Anniversery.  old 

User currently offlineFreckles From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2007, 386 posts, RR: 8
Reply 14, posted (6 years 4 months 3 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2818 times:



Quoting BlackProjects (Reply 13):

Thought they were typhoons and yeah we heard they were off to Hendon.

Cheers


User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13186 posts, RR: 77
Reply 15, posted (6 years 4 months 3 weeks 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2773 times:

And some pics;
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_pictures/7324754.stm


User currently offlineLuvJetFuel From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2008, 22 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (6 years 4 months 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 2616 times:

argh! .. lol .. i went to chelsea bridge , WITH my camcorder hoping to get a brilliant view of the red arrows and the MIGHTY typhoons .. unfortunatly the thames is like a curly wirly lol and i didnt get a very good view, but still , it was nice seeing my two most favorite RAF aircraft !

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic RAF To Celebrate 90 Years Of Service
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
KC-45 To Be Built In Up To 13 Lots (years) posted Sun Mar 16 2008 07:03:17 by KC135TopBoom
Air Force One 747 Out Of Service In Vietnam posted Mon Nov 20 2006 02:11:49 by Md94
OFFICIAL---RAF To Purchase 5th C-17 posted Fri Aug 4 2006 17:00:19 by RAPCON
RAF To Buy Outright The C17? posted Fri Apr 16 2004 19:25:04 by Splitzer
RAF To Order F-16s? posted Sat Oct 12 2002 19:43:23 by 777kicksass
RAF To Retire Wessex Helicopters posted Tue Mar 26 2002 13:54:07 by David_itl
Report: Third Of RAF Bomber Sqns "To Be Culled" posted Sun Oct 7 2007 11:19:25 by RC135U
RAF Mrtt To Be Built In USA? posted Fri Feb 29 2008 16:00:35 by KennyK
RAF Nimrod MRA4 Pays A Rare Visit To SWF posted Tue Feb 5 2008 21:18:25 by AlitaliaMD11
Delivery Of CH 148 Cyclones Delayed 3 Years posted Wed Jan 9 2008 14:04:18 by TheCol

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format