Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
GAO Blasts Military Spending  
User currently offlineKen777 From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 9248 posts, RR: 10
Posted (8 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 1 hour ago) and read 2667 times:

95 major programs over budget by $295 Billion and most about 2 years late:


A rather biting article for all branches, but bad timing to make it public in terms of the tanker.

Apologies if this is a dublicate.

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12360 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (8 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2624 times:

Quoting Ken777 (Thread starter):
A rather biting article for all branches, but bad timing to make it public in terms of the tanker.

Look for Congressmen/women to start jumping in front of TV cameras all over the country, "exposing these wasteful projects, and threating to begin congressional Investigations/Hearings".

good by KC-45.

good by LCS

good by F-22

good by MV-22

good by bullets....................................

User currently offlineAlien From Romania, joined Oct 2009, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (8 years 1 month 3 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 2531 times:

Lets hope they do something about it.

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 1):
good by KC-45.

So whats wrong with that? Less expensive, less risky home grown alternatives that are good enough.

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 1):
good by LCS

A mess if ever there was one and it deserves to die. Come back with something without the 50 knot requirement and you may get something useful and affordable. Come now we are not talking capital ships here.

I would not worry about the last three. In fact F-22 and MV-22 are pretty much already developed. It will be far less expensive to keep buying them than to kill them and start over again.

How about this one. Kill the F-35A and F-35B. Fund more F-22s and fund all F-35Cs. The B model has a limited market/need and is what drives up cost and constrains the design and the A model is redundant. You may as well get one with a bigger wing, more range and more potential (external) payload.

For now, drop the new tanker acquisition and fund KC-135 rebuilds. Fully fund/revive CRAF, buy more C-17s.

The list could go on and on.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic GAO Blasts Military Spending
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
First Top Military Award For Female RAF Pilot posted Fri Mar 7 2008 11:34:38 by GDB
Military Flight Over CLT Help posted Sat Feb 16 2008 15:37:58 by AT777
Pilot Safety In Military Aircraft posted Wed Feb 13 2008 03:49:40 by SpenceSaab
Aircraft That Define Military Events posted Thu Feb 7 2008 22:03:34 by L-188
Test Pilots: Military Or Civil? posted Mon Jan 28 2008 16:19:59 by Flighty
Large Military Turboprop At LHR, 11.35am, 27Jan08 posted Sun Jan 27 2008 03:35:01 by LHR777
Current State Of US Military Fleet. posted Mon Jan 14 2008 12:27:23 by CX747
How Many Military Birds On A.Net Have You Flown? posted Tue Dec 25 2007 17:43:15 by KevinSmith
US Military Exectutive Transport Fleet? posted Sat Dec 8 2007 19:22:58 by Flighty
EU Set To Regulate Military Aircraft Emissions posted Tue Nov 13 2007 04:04:51 by Lumberton

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format