Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Role Of Military Planes Declines In Boeing's Defen  
User currently offlineStitch From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 31123 posts, RR: 85
Posted (6 years 6 months 3 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 3396 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Seattle Times Aerospace Reporter Dominic Gates had an interesting front page article on the future role (or lack thereof) military aircraft has at Boeing.

Quote:
Boeing once built massive fleets of World War II and Cold War military planes. But right now, the world's biggest airplane builder can't boast even a single prime contract to supply the U.S. military's next generation of fighters, bombers, tankers and transport planes.

Last month's loss of the Air Force tanker contract to Northrop Grumman and its European partner, if it stands, further weakens Boeing's already diminished role in producing future warplanes.

"The Boeing Co. morphed," said Wall Street analyst Joe Campbell of Lehman Brothers. On the defense side, building airplanes "is not even what they're known for anymore," he said.

In recent years, Boeing's defense unit has shifted focus from planes to big-ticket electronic-hardware systems: satellites, missile defense, networked warfare and border-surveillance projects.

It's no accident, however, that Boeing's military division — the 71,000-employee Integrated Defense Systems (IDS) — now doesn't have airplanes in its name.

IDS delivered just 84 airplanes last year, including 16 big C-17 transport airplanes and 44 fighter jets. Boeing's commercial side, by contrast, delivered 441 airplanes.

For the next generation of military planes, Boeing is the prime contractor on just one program: the Navy's P-8 submarine hunter.

But apart from that, Boeing's defense division could wind up more a parts maker than a plane maker.

Having lost the fighters and the tankers, what's the next big hope for IDS? In January, Boeing announced it will team with Lockheed to compete for the right to build the next-generation U.S. bomber for service around 2018.

Even if Boeing wins, that aircraft won't be based on a commercial plane.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/htm...aerospace/2004332005_boeing07.html

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Role Of Military Planes Declines In Boeing's Defen
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Going In Front Of Military Boards. posted Sat Mar 4 2006 02:57:47 by Jalto27R
Half Of Germany's Transalls Are In Shambles posted Wed Nov 7 2007 12:21:16 by Lumberton
Turkish Military Jet Crash In Western Turkey posted Fri Sep 21 2007 17:50:38 by Stickers
Two Military Helicopters Collide In Sweden. posted Tue Sep 11 2007 16:55:30 by SAS A340
Toilets On Military Planes? posted Mon Oct 16 2006 05:18:27 by LimaNiner
Looking For Some Military Planes Unit Price posted Wed Jul 19 2006 22:53:34 by Chrisdigo
What Is Your Favorite Type Of Military Plane? posted Sat Jun 3 2006 20:02:45 by 747400sp
US Military Plane Down In Japan posted Tue Jan 17 2006 04:10:53 by AR1300
Ex- Military Planes You'd Want And Why posted Thu Sep 22 2005 02:46:24 by TedTAce
Official Model Numbers Of Military 707s posted Mon Apr 4 2005 10:59:51 by Duke

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format