Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
FAB F-18 Proposal; Fach Signs Up For Super Tucanos  
User currently offlinePPVRA From Brazil, joined Nov 2004, 8971 posts, RR: 39
Posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 5 hours ago) and read 9363 times:

Quote:
Boeing Delivers Super Hornet Proposal to Brazil For F-X2 Competition

ST. LOUIS, Aug. 15, 2008 -- The Boeing Company [NYSE: BA] delivered a detailed proposal July 30 offering its advanced F/A-18E/F Super Hornet to the Brazilian Air Force as part of Brazil's F-X2 fighter competition.

"International interest in the combat-proven Super Hornet continues to increase, and Boeing is honored Brazil is considering the Super Hornet to meet its near-term defense requirements," said Bob Gower, F/A-18 and EA-18 Programs vice president, Boeing Integrated Defense Systems.

Boeing received a Request for Information from the government of Brazil on June 12. The stated initial requirement is for 36 aircraft, with the potential for up to 120 aircraft.

http://www.defesanet.com.br/fx2/f-18_e.htm



Interesting development. Note that Lockheed's F-16 was dropped from the F-X2 competition, replaced by its F-35.

Quote:
EMBRAER WILL SUPPLY THE SUPER TUCANO TO THE CHILEAN AIR FORCE Aircraft will be used on tactical training missions


São José dos Campos, August 15, 2008 – Embraer and the Fuerza Aérea de Chile,(FACh) signed a contract, today, for the sale of 12 Super Tucano aircraft. This is the end result of a public bid held by the FACh, which chose the airplane manufactured by Embraer as the best solution for the tactical training of its pilots. The first Super Tucano should be delivered in the second half of 2009.

The Super Tucano is currently operated by the Brazilian and Colombian Air Forces, for successfully training pilots and high-precision light attack procedures on internal security missions. The Embraer proposal chosen by the FACh includes a broad Integrated Logistic Support (ILS) package and an advanced Training and Operation Support System (TOSS), covering not only the aircraft but, also, ground support stations.

Seems like the Super Tucanos are taking off in export orders. Colombia's successful and widely reported attack on FARC rebels inside Ecuador territory might have turned heads.

[Edited 2008-08-15 16:49:14]


"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
29 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4936 posts, RR: 1
Reply 1, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 9308 times:



Quoting PPVRA (Thread starter):
Interesting development. Note that Lockheed's F-16 was dropped from the F-X2 competition, replaced by its F-35.

If LockMart could control the JSF's spiraling cost and meet the FAB's technology transfer and required in-service date, then it would be in for a good fight. Otherwise, it would be a free-for-all with the Super Bug, Rafale, Typhoon and the Su-30.....

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Robin Powney
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tim Lachenmaier


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gary Stedman
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Vala - Russian AviaPhoto Team


At the lower end, the Gripen has no competition.....

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Aldo Bidini
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Glenn Beasley



Quoting PPVRA (Thread starter):
Seems like the Super Tucanos are taking off in export orders. Colombia's successful and widely reported attack on FARC rebels inside Ecuador territory might have turned heads.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Andrés Contador - AirTeamImages
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Andrés Contador - AirTeamImages


It does seem the Super Tucano has the inside track on COIN aircraft competitions.



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlineWvsuperhornet From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 517 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 9252 times:

I think you could write off the F-35 the US would never transfer the technology, they may but I would be very suprised if they did. I think it will come down between the Superhornet and the Gripen, the Superhornet being the more capable of the two but also more expensive unless they sign of a deal like Australia did. The SU-30 may be in the mix but it just depends on how Brazil reacts to the Recent Russian agressions I am not sure Brazil wants to be on the US naughty list since it pretty much inevitable now that Russian and US relations are pretty much down the toilet and will be for a while. I dont know their point of view on it so it would be hard for me to judge.

User currently offlineEBJ1248650 From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 1932 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 9152 times:



Quoting Wvsuperhornet (Reply 2):
I think it will come down between the Superhornet and the Gripen, the Superhornet being the more capable of the two but also more expensive unless they sign of a deal like Australia did.

Why wouldn't the Rafale be in the running? Brazil doesn't strike me as a country that has to lean towards the least expensive airplane and apparently they don't need to. The fact they're considering the F-35 suggests very strongly money isn't a big issue. So, the Rafale is a potential competitor as is the Typhoon, in its multi-mission configuration.



Dare to dream; dream big!
User currently offlineWvsuperhornet From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 517 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 9149 times:



Quoting EBJ1248650 (Reply 3):
Why wouldn't the Rafale be in the running? Brazil doesn't strike me as a country that has to lean towards the least expensive airplane and apparently they don't need to. The fact they're considering the F-35 suggests very strongly money isn't a big issue. So, the Rafale is a potential competitor as is the Typhoon, in its multi-mission configuration.

The Rafale couldnt even win the contract in their won backyard in africa they wont win it here either. I have nothing against the Rafale, they havent been sucessfull in exporting it to anyone. The typhoon is about as close as you can get to an F-22 unfortunatly they are getting to the point where is about as expensive. Sorry I doubt either plane stands a chance. They were considering the F-35 the last time on the original FX program and it was scrapped because of lack of funds..dont let it fool you Money is very much an object in this bid.


User currently offlineBaron95 From United States of America, joined May 2006, 1335 posts, RR: 8
Reply 5, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 9130 times:

Given that the F-18EF is the only fighter, other than the F22, with a Full AESA radar that operates in A2A, A2G and jamming modes and has a full complement of A2A and A2G weapons already integrated, it is the by far the best multi-role fighter in the world and probably even the best A2A short of the un-exportable F22.

I think Brazil should give serious consideration to the F18-EF, add afew F18Gs to the mix and orther the buddy fueling system as well. 36 of those, set up as 3 squadrons would finally but the FAB on the map in South America.

I'd even go as far as saying that they should order the full carrier set up for the planes. Who knows, in the future Brazil may field something like the British CVF (sans STOVL ramps but with proper catapult/traps).

I would not order more than 36 though. The next 36 should be F35Bs.



Killer Fleet: E190, 737-900ER, 777-300ER
User currently offlinePPVRA From Brazil, joined Nov 2004, 8971 posts, RR: 39
Reply 6, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 9038 times:



Quoting Baron95 (Reply 5):
Given that the F-18EF is the only fighter, other than the F22, with a Full AESA radar that operates in A2A, A2G and jamming modes and has a full complement of A2A and A2G weapons already integrated, it is the by far the best multi-role fighter in the world and probably even the best A2A short of the un-exportable F22.

Yup. The only problem I can see would be the technology transfer. They may be able o work around that.

The Rafale apparently has radar technology that has been described as "a technological dead-end". That's a very big negative, though I still think the type has good chances.

Quoting Wvsuperhornet (Reply 2):
I think you could write off the F-35 the US would never transfer the technology



Quoting Wvsuperhornet (Reply 4):
Money is very much an object in this bid.

Technology transfer and money are the two reasons why I would rule out the F-35. I'm not sure why the F-35 was even put into the list. We'll see.



"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
User currently offlineArt From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2005, 3388 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 9011 times:



Quoting Wvsuperhornet (Reply 4):
The Rafale couldnt even win the contract in their won backyard in africa they wont win it here either.

I believe Rafale was selected by Morocco but an astonishing faux pas on the price blew the deal.

Quoting PPVRA (Reply 6):
The Rafale apparently has radar technology that has been described as "a technological dead-end". That's a very big negative, though I still think the type has good chances.

EASA is coming to Rafale, reportedly scheduled for 2011 in a 2007 Flight aticle by Jon Lake.

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...irst-with-thales-active-radar.html


User currently offlineWvsuperhornet From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 517 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 8986 times:



Quoting Art (Reply 7):
I believe Rafale was selected by Morocco but an astonishing faux pas on the price blew the deal.

So again it didn't win the contract.

Quoting Baron95 (Reply 5):
Given that the F-18EF is the only fighter, other than the F22, with a Full AESA radar that operates in A2A, A2G and jamming modes and has a full complement of A2A and A2G weapons already integrated, it is the by far the best multi-role fighter in the world and probably even the best A2A short of the un-exportable F22.

I think Brazil should give serious consideration to the F18-EF, add afew F18Gs to the mix and orther the buddy fueling system as well. 36 of those, set up as 3 squadrons would finally but the FAB on the map in South America.

I agree I think the F-18 E/F would be the best selection for them.


User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4936 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 8965 times:



Quoting Wvsuperhornet (Reply 2):
The SU-30 may be in the mix but it just depends on how Brazil reacts to the Recent Russian agressions I am not sure Brazil wants to be on the US naughty list since it pretty much inevitable now that Russian and US relations are pretty much down the toilet and will be for a while. I dont know their point of view on it so it would be hard for me to judge.

Yes, it would be a tough call, especially since Brazil's neighbor to the North acquired some and is rumored to be after more, including tanker, transport and ISR assets.....

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ivan P. Nesbit - Mexico Air Spotters
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jorge Oppenheimer


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ivan P. Nesbit - Mexico Air Spotters
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jorge Oppenheimer


Anyway, the Su-35 version was reportedly the one to be proposed.....

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ilya Morozov - Russian AviaPhoto Team
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Sergey Riabsev - Russian AviaPhoto Team


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Dmitry A. Mottl
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Dmitry A. Mottl


Whichever, it would cost serious money - short of the Russians underpricing to clinch the deal.



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlineBaron95 From United States of America, joined May 2006, 1335 posts, RR: 8
Reply 10, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 4 days ago) and read 8941 times:



Quoting Art (Reply 7):
EASA is coming to Rafale, reportedly scheduled for 2011

I'm sorry but the Rafale's planned AESA radar is a kludge. What they are proporting to do can't work well. They are proposing to keep the same decade+ olde radar backend and only change the antenna front end. They are proposing to maintain the small nose diameter, which will limite the number of array elements and their power deu to heat. They are not proposing ANY upgrade in the ship's power to drive the AESA array.

I'm sorry, but this is a joke. Unless Rafale upgrades power, puts up a bigger nose and licenses something like a Raytheon AESA, it will never be competitive with the FA18-E/F, the F15C/E/K-AESA, let alone the F22/F35.

AESA and LPI communications, by themselves or together with LO technology are the key technologies that will make a fighter viable in the next 40 years. That is the FAB horizon.

Why does the FAB has this BS on technology transfer. The only think they should care about is ability to integrate new weapons by themselves. They just need access to the weapons integration SW/HW interfaces.

All else is BS. Best to have the best fighter than the technology transfer for junk fighters.



Killer Fleet: E190, 737-900ER, 777-300ER
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29813 posts, RR: 58
Reply 11, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 8931 times:

Any chance of a follow-on order to replace the various vintages of A-4's they are flying off that carrier of theirs?....the ex-Foch.


OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlinePPVRA From Brazil, joined Nov 2004, 8971 posts, RR: 39
Reply 12, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 8833 times:

Quoting L-188 (Reply 11):
Any chance of a follow-on order to replace the various vintages of A-4's they are flying off that carrier of theirs?....the ex-Foch.

I don't see it as a priority for them. They need to focus on renovating the fleet, and my bet is they'll go for second hand aircraft when they do replace the A4s. But who knows, a follow on order could happen.

[Edited 2008-08-18 19:47:33]


"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
User currently offlinePyrex From Portugal, joined Aug 2005, 4038 posts, RR: 28
Reply 13, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 8818 times:



Quoting Wvsuperhornet (Reply 4):
The Rafale couldnt even win the contract in their won backyard in africa they wont win it here either. I

The Rafale has to be the top contender in this race. Not only is the Brazilian Air Force already a significant Dassault customer but a) Brazil will not want to go with a U.S. weapons system if they can avoid it due to the history of US-Brazilian relations, in particular military cooperation and b) it is perhaps the best multirole fighter out there on a $-per-capability basis. Since the Su-30, despite being a very capable platform (although a sub-par weapons system) seems to be reserved for pariah states and the Gripen is too small I would say the Rafale has a very good chance of getting the contract.

Oh, and before you talk about "backyard" and stuff like that please do remember that the only reason the F-15 beat the Rafale in Korea was political influence.



Read this very carefully, I shall write this only once!
User currently offlineBaron95 From United States of America, joined May 2006, 1335 posts, RR: 8
Reply 14, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 8755 times:

I agree the Rafale has the inside track to win this contract, but I disagree that it is the best fighter for the FAB. Brazil is a very large country. They don't have a lot of AWACS. Their CINDACTA ground radar systems leaves much to be desired. They need to be able to send fighters up with powerful AESA radars that can operate autonomously.

No one, other than the US fighters have fielded full AESA radars, nor is there a clear path for it.

Brazil needs F-18E/Fs now (36-40) and F35Bs later (36-40) with the AESA radars, Slammer Ds, AIM9X, SDBs and a few LGBs. That is what they need. Fits them to the T.

That is also what Australia needs (similar country side), and apparently what they will get.



Killer Fleet: E190, 737-900ER, 777-300ER
User currently offlineWvsuperhornet From United States of America, joined Aug 2007, 517 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (6 years 3 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 8595 times:



Quoting Pyrex (Reply 13):
Oh, and before you talk about "backyard" and stuff like that please do remember that the only reason the F-15 beat the Rafale in Korea was political influence.

That and the fact the F-15 has a more powerfull radar, can carry more ordinance and has a longer range.


User currently offlineBaron95 From United States of America, joined May 2006, 1335 posts, RR: 8
Reply 16, posted (6 years 3 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 8513 times:

Whatever they do, they beter do it fast. The FAB is seriously outclassed when it comes to front line fighters (even by some much smaller/poorer neighbors).


Killer Fleet: E190, 737-900ER, 777-300ER
User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4936 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (6 years 3 months 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 8503 times:

Brazil could even achieve quick parity if the UK would be desperate enough to unload their ordered Eurofighters at a deeply discounted price.....

http://www.defense-aerospace.com/cgi...AT&cat=3&prod=97259&modele=release

Typhoon Offload and Claims of MOD Budget Crisis
(Source: UK Ministry of Defence; issued Aug. 20, 2008)

Quote:
"The Financial Times has reported that the MOD has been in talks with other countries to 'offload' Eurofighter Typhoons that it has ordered but can no longer afford. The FT says that this underlines 'the scale of the cash crisis facing the MOD as it grapples with an estimated budget deficit of £2 billion'."

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © APGPhoto/Flight Global


Of course, the FAB has to beat other interested parties like India and Japan to the draw, just in case.

[Edited 2008-08-23 13:49:21]


"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlinePPVRA From Brazil, joined Nov 2004, 8971 posts, RR: 39
Reply 18, posted (6 years 3 months 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 8427 times:

Btw, I have just read an article (magazine, non-official source) that says the F-X2 budget is around BRL 3.5 billion, or roughly USD 2.1 billion. That makes it just right for 36X F-18s E/F at USD 55.2 million per unit (price quoted from wikipedia, which linked it to the USN Fiscal 2008/2009 Budget Estimates). The Rafale is slightly above the F-18, though the number quoted (USD 62.1 million) is from a non-official estimate from back in 2006.

Quoting DEVILFISH (Reply 17):

Any idea how many they are offloading?

[Edited 2008-08-24 10:11:15]


"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4936 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (6 years 3 months 4 days 10 hours ago) and read 8413 times:



Quoting PPVRA (Reply 18):
Btw, I have just read an article (magazine, non-official source) that says the F-X2 budget is around BRL 3.5 billion, or roughly USD 2.1 billion. That makes it just right for 36X F-18s E/F at USD 55.2 million per unit

Drawing from those figures, it may be a bit optimistic for the Typhoon to come in at roughly the same cost per frame, MoD's financial straits notwithstanding.

Quoting PPVRA (Reply 18):
Any idea how many they are offloading?

The press release header said the UK MoD wouldn't comment on the Typhoon resale, so we have no way of confirming the numbers, or if indeed that was the case. From the link above.....

Quote:
"The MOD remains in discussions with the Eurofighter Partners on Tranche 3. No final decisions have been made by the MOD on Tranche 3.

We will not comment on Government-to-Government discussions, even to confirm that discussions are taking place."


Who knows? There might be enough available to supply the ongoing tenders where it's shortlisted (provided they agree on a price), or there might be just a few or none at all.  confused 



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4936 posts, RR: 1
Reply 20, posted (6 years 3 months 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 8304 times:

Update:

Now, the report is definitely contradictory.....

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...-cut-for-f-x2-fighter-bidders.html

Quote:
"The current field is understood to cover the Boeing F/A-18E/F Block II Super Hornet, Dassault Rafale, Eurofighter Typhoon, Lockheed Martin F-16BR, Saab Gripen NG and Sukhoi Su-30.

Lockheed confirms that the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter will not be offered for the Brazilian order, which requires the selected manufacturer to transfer all technology required to maintain the aircraft.

'The F-16BR has been developed to satisfy the originating requirements, inventory and delivery dates, offset and industrial co-operation - all while providing the Brazilian air force with the most advanced and capable F-16 available,' Lockheed says. However, the company referred questions about further details of its bid to the US government.


I think by "most advanced", LockMart will be proposing the F-16BR with either Raytheon's new RACR or Northrop's SABR AESA radar.....

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...nt-line-fighter-radar-upgrade.html

http://www.flightglobal.com/articles...veals-new-aesa-radar-for-f-16.html

So, aside from the bigger SU-30 (again!) SAAB's Gripen NG may have a bonafide competitor at the lower pricepoint for this deal after all?.....

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tomas Sousek
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Karl Drage




"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4936 posts, RR: 1
Reply 21, posted (6 years 3 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 8281 times:


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jan Jorgensen
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Andreas Weber




"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
User currently offlinePPVRA From Brazil, joined Nov 2004, 8971 posts, RR: 39
Reply 22, posted (6 years 3 months 2 days ago) and read 8274 times:

My source (same as used before) also confirms the F-35 is out and the F-16BR is back in. F-18E (note: F version not specified) and Gripen still in the game, as well as the Su-35, not the -30.

We'll see what becomes of this. Btw, the technology transfer requirement mentioned in the article is "all necessary technology to maintain the aircraft in operation". This is the quoted reason for the disqualification of the F-35.

[Edited 2008-08-26 21:14:32]


"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
User currently offlinePPVRA From Brazil, joined Nov 2004, 8971 posts, RR: 39
Reply 23, posted (6 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 7659 times:

Pre-selected short-list:

1 - BOEING (F-18 E/F SUPER HORNET),
2 - DASSAULT (RAFALE) and
3 - SAAB (GRIPEN NG).

36 aircraft, delivery beginning 2014.



"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
User currently offlineTGIF From Sweden, joined Apr 2008, 277 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (6 years 1 month 3 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 7647 times:

Wow, congrats to Boeing, Dassault and Saab! Personally, I thought the Su-30 would have great chances to come out on top in the end.

Boeing was no surprise, great A/C.

Great news for Rafale and perhaps their bad streak of missed export opportunities can come to an end. No surprise though.

Great new for the Gripen NG as well. Outlasting the F-16 and EF is hopefully a good sign, having the Swiss, Croatian and Romanian competitions in mind. EIS 2014 sounds a bit early though for the NG. Thought I saw 2015 as a possible EIS for the SwAF (if there's any money in the defense budget...). Possible deal breaker?

Correct me if I'm wrong but this decision was made from the RFI proposals? When can one expect a final decision? Guessing that gathering and evaluating RFP's may take a while.... 2010?


25 PPVRA : I wasn't too surprised Sukhoi didn't make it. The previous administration, who had pre-selected the Gripen but left the ultimate decision to our curre
26 Post contains links DEVILFISH : These press releases say around the latter part of 2009..... http://www.defense-aerospace.com/cgi...AK&cat=3&prod=98406&modele=release Air Force Comm
27 SAS A340 : I think that the degree of sharing tecnology will have a big say in how this will end,personaly i belive that the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet will outcome
28 Post contains links DEVILFISH : These blog and comments provide a succinct background for the competing types..... http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/th...razil-fighter-buyers-reject
29 SAS A340 : Interesting read...Thank's!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic FAB F-18 Proposal; Fach Signs Up For Super Tucanos
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Boeing/Grumman Team-up For CEV posted Thu Nov 11 2004 23:41:28 by DfwRevolution
Replacement For CF-18 posted Thu Jan 31 2008 06:41:17 by Jamincan
Great Time For Usmc To Buy Super Hornets... posted Sun Jun 24 2007 20:09:58 by AirRyan
F/A-18 Hornet For Mexico...? posted Thu Jan 18 2007 04:05:06 by Cun757
Does The F/A-18 "Super Hornet" Have AC? posted Sat Jul 1 2006 22:36:49 by CX747
12 To 18 Rafales For Morocco posted Tue Jun 6 2006 23:23:44 by ElGreco
Super SeaSprites For The RAN, Is It The End? posted Mon May 15 2006 09:59:38 by Ozair
C17 Pickes Up Dutch Apaches For Afghanistan posted Wed Apr 12 2006 15:45:41 by Skippy777
What Do You Like About The F/A-18-E/F Super Hornet posted Mon Mar 27 2006 23:12:13 by 747400sp
Super Hornets For Bulgaria? (F-5's Too!) posted Fri Mar 24 2006 04:26:57 by AirRyan

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format