Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Maneuverability Comparability Question  
User currently offlineBlackbird From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (7 years 8 months 1 week 6 hours ago) and read 4177 times:

Okay, I'm wondering how the F-100, the F-102A and F-106A stack-up to each in order in terms of maneuverability.


1 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineBlackbird From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (7 years 8 months 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 4101 times:

Look, I doubt I could find anything on google about this; if I could it would take a large number of search queries to pull this off.

Here's from what I remember (I could use some clarification)

1.) The F-100 was not as maneuverable as the USAF wanted it to be and it ended up a fighter-bomber for the most part. However someone on this forum (KC135TopBoom, I think) said that the F-100 was more maneuverable than the F-8 Crusader. Considering the F-8 was a very maneuverable airplane (and I've seen some footage of those planes, especially the F8U-2 / F-8C and F-8E's) and were highly effective in dogfights against both the MiG-17 and MiG-21 in Vietnam, this sounds almost like a contradictory statement (which causes me to have doubt about the F-100 being less maneuverable than the F-8, since it was considered a disappointment to the USAF)

2.) The F-106A I was told could outmaneuver an F-4 at altitudes above 10,000 to 20,000 feet it would seem (could be wrong here), and in simulated dogfights the F-106A usually won close in fights*. I would assume the F-102A would be similar in performance as they have virtually the same wing-design (though not sure, the F-106A weighs more, and the thrust to weight ratios might not be the same on the F-102A and F-106A)

3.) The F-4 was less maneuverable than the F-100 from what I remember, and the F-106A/F-102A was/were more maneuverable than the F-4. However I don't know if the F-106A/F-102A were more maneuverable than the F-100...

*In 1961 SECDEF McNamara was planning on buying 360 extra F-106A's for the Air Defense Command. Due to the high-opinion of the USN's F4H-1/F-4B Phantom and it's performance, McNamara ordered a fly-off between the two. The USAF leased some F4H-1's and designated them as F-110A Spectre. The F-106 and F-110A flew off. While the F-110A had a better combat radius, climb-capability, and missile/radars, the F-106A usually won in up-close fights.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Maneuverability Comparability Question
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
F-16 Maneuverability Question posted Tue Mar 18 2008 13:17:40 by Blackbird
F-86/FJ-2 And J-47 Engine Question posted Mon Aug 4 2008 19:52:25 by Blackbird
F-16 Sidestick Question posted Fri Aug 1 2008 03:53:06 by Blackbird
FJ-Fury / F-86 Question posted Wed Jul 30 2008 20:07:36 by Blackbird
F-15 And F-16 Maneuverability Strongpoints posted Sun Jul 20 2008 18:39:15 by Blackbird
Question Regarding F-16 And Sustained G's posted Sun Jul 20 2008 14:21:55 by Blackbird
Afterburning Turbofan C/D Nozzle Question posted Fri Jul 18 2008 21:48:21 by Blackbird
Energy Maneuverability Equation posted Thu Jul 17 2008 20:13:19 by Blackbird
Two Types Of Inflight Refueling Question posted Sun Jul 6 2008 13:40:14 by Airmech
Air Force One To Detroit 6/25 - Question posted Tue Jun 24 2008 18:32:43 by Nwafan20

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format