Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Military Reason For Formation Flying  
User currently offlineNicoEDDF From Germany, joined Jan 2008, 1099 posts, RR: 1
Posted (5 years 10 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 12625 times:

Hey folks,

what is the pristine reason for formation flying in the military for the different war birds?
How has this manner evolved in the jet age up to now?

Anyone some details and insights, please?  Smile

17 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineKC135TopBoom From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12134 posts, RR: 51
Reply 1, posted (5 years 10 months 4 days ago) and read 12630 times:

There are two primary reasons, navigation and target strike. They also fly formation for mutual defense.

User currently offlineNicoEDDF From Germany, joined Jan 2008, 1099 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (5 years 10 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 12592 times:



Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 1):
navigation

In respect to this, does formation flying as term only include close formations or is any "flying together" referred to as formation flying?

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 1):
target strike

Sorry, don't exactly understand what you mean with that.

Quoting KC135TopBoom (Reply 1):
They also fly formation for mutual defense

I guess this was just the more important in the days of machine guns as the primary anti-air weapon where heavy bombers flew together to bring as much defense guns in a small area.

Is this still true today? And again, is the typical leader and wingman flying already referred to as formation in order to not be alone up there?

What are the chances you can use formations to deceive radar pictures?


User currently offlineF4wso From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 974 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (5 years 10 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 12558 times:

Another reason are to keep the element together when penetrating weather.

Aircraft carrying live ordnance will not take off in fingertip formation. I was in a large formation at a 1983 Red Flag where the flight and element leads departed off of one runway while their wingmen rolled simultaneously off of the parallel.

Formation flying simplifys air traffic control by keeping the flight together until over the airfield.

Gary
Cottage Grove, MN, USA



Seeking an honest week's pay for an honest day's work
User currently offlineUH60FtRucker From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (5 years 10 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 12529 times:

We do formation flying in helicopters because it offers mutual protection, and mission integrity.

If you ever get a chance to see a true air assault, with multiple aircraft, I highly suggest it. When I flew with the 101st, the division was renowned for having perfected the art of formation flying, and air assaults. I always got a rush when we performed an assault, landing 6 birds together - all touching down at the exact moment, all unloading the troops, and flying off together.

Not to mention, there is a psychological impact on the enemy when they see a formation of aircraft coming their way. A nice, "We're coming for you" message.  Smile

Now a days, I don't do as much large formation flights, but I do get the opportunity to do some aerial refueling, which is quite the rush. Nothing like being up close to a C-130 at altitude!

-UH60


User currently offlineLemmy From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 258 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (5 years 10 months 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 12498 times:



Quoting F4wso (Reply 3):
Formation flying simplifys air traffic control by keeping the flight together until over the airfield.

How does ATC handle formations? Is one plane designated as "the guy that talks to the controllers"? How does a formation show up on the controller's flight plan strip?



I am a patient boy ...
User currently offlineMoose135 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 2312 posts, RR: 10
Reply 6, posted (5 years 10 months 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 12490 times:



Quoting Lemmy (Reply 5):
How does ATC handle formations? Is one plane designated as "the guy that talks to the controllers"?

Yes...while in formation, the flight lead talks to ATC, and are handled as a single entity.



KC-135 - Passing gas and taking names!
User currently offlineDragon6172 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 1202 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (5 years 10 months 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 12422 times:



Quoting NicoEDDF (Reply 2):
In respect to this, does formation flying as term only include close formations or is any "flying together" referred to as formation flying?

All different kinds of formation flying. Parade formations are typically what you see at airshows, it is the close formations that everyone can easily recognize. They are not very good for individual manuevering though. For example, with a flight in a tight echelon formation, the lead is somewhat limited in that it would not be very good to make an evasive break turn towards his wingmen. Sure it is the wingmans responsibility to maintain seperation, but if he is not expecting the turn, it can get ugly.
Tactical formations are typically more spread out to allow for manuevering. Still considered formations though, with flight leads and wingmen. Usually you do not want to be so far that you can not cover your wingman with your weapons though. I was a helo guy, we usually tried to stay withen 500-800 feet laterally of each other because thats withen the effective range of our door guns. Now jet guys, they could be quite a bit further apart, because their weapons range is much further.

Another reason for formations is for emergencies. If a plane goes down, his wingman is right there to mark the spot, circle, radio relay, etc. Also, for single cockpit planes with inflight emergencies, the wingman can handle radio calls, back up reading emergency procedures, troubleshooting, visually inspect the other aircraft, etc. This allows the guy with the actual emergency to focus on the flying of his broke bird.

Quoting NicoEDDF (Reply 2):
What are the chances you can use formations to deceive radar pictures?

This is possible. Basically you are trying to hide the number of aircraft you have. You can fly close enough that a radar will only pick up one target. The closer you get to the radar, the more difficult this is though.
In lay mens, think of a radar picture as a bunch of cells going out. As long as both aircraft radar returns are coming from the same cell, they will show up as one blip. The cells get smaller the closer you are to the radar reciever, so it is much harder to keep both aircraft in one cell. Same idea behind chaff clouds. A plane comes along and drops a long string of chaff, causing a whole string of cells that are giving returns, and the radar reciever can not see the blips of the aircraft moving because his screen just shows a whole mass of blips. Eventually as the aircraft get closer, the radar returns from them will be stronger than the returns from the chaff, and the reciever can see the aircraft again. Usually called burn through.

Thats it in a nutshell. I am sure there are those who are more knowledgeable on the topic who can give ya more details or correct anything I was off on.



Phrogs Phorever
User currently offlineFerrypilot From New Zealand, joined Sep 2006, 897 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (5 years 10 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 12349 times:



Quoting NicoEDDF (Reply 2):
In respect to this, does formation flying as term only include close formations or is any "flying together" referred to as formation flying?

In a battle formation pair the wingman could be split by as much as 4 nautical miles from his lead and only just able to keep him in sight.


User currently offlineMissedApproach From Canada, joined Oct 2004, 713 posts, RR: 2
Reply 9, posted (5 years 10 months 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 12331 times:

Some of these lack a bit of detail, but you get an idea for the kind of spacing used in an actual combat formation.

http://www.combataircraft.com/formations/index.aspx

The main purpose is so that each aircraft can provide mutual support to the others, in the same way that an infantryman in a trench is supported by the trench to either side of him. There are other benefits, as mentioned- in the bad old days of unreliable INS systems, it was better to have 4 guys checking the route navigation rather than just one.
As for the tight airshow formations- I think they're mainly for training value. You would certainly learn to pay attention & keep your corrections small!



Can you hear me now?
User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 10, posted (5 years 10 months 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 12292 times:



Quoting NicoEDDF (Reply 2):
is any "flying together" referred to as formation flying?

Only by the USAF Thunderbirds.

signed
- The US Navy Blue Angels



Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlineVenus6971 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 1442 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (5 years 10 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 12277 times:



Quoting UH60FtRucker (Reply 4):
Now a days, I don't do as much large formation flights, but I do get the opportunity to do some aerial refueling, which is quite the rush. Nothing like being up close to a C-130 at altitude!

Did not know our Army brethen were doing AR's with their UH-60's, you flying MH-60's now in the USAF or just catching a ride with the blue to see how they do it.



I would help you but it is not in the contract
User currently offlineFerrypilot From New Zealand, joined Sep 2006, 897 posts, RR: 3
Reply 12, posted (5 years 10 months 3 days 8 hours ago) and read 12267 times:



Quoting SlamClick (Reply 10):

Quoting NicoEDDF (Reply 2):
is any "flying together" referred to as formation flying?

Only by the USAF Thunderbirds.

signed
- The US Navy Blue Angels

Is that a quote SlamClick or are you telling us you have been a Blue Angel?????


User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 13, posted (5 years 10 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 12226 times:



Quoting Ferrypilot (Reply 12):
are you telling us you have been a Blue Angel

Heavens no! I'm nowhere near that good. But having watched:

The Thunderbirds dozens of times in F-4, T-38 and F-16 over more than thirty years
The Blues hundreds of times in F-11, F-4, A-4 and F-18 over more than forty years

...I just thought it sounded like something they might say. Let's say it is easier to get all four in a single frame with the Blues than it is with the Thunderbirds.

My bragging rights - I was once in a 144-ship of mixed fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft. We were in cells of six (two vee-of-three) of each of 12 different aircraft types, but we sequenced ourselves past the airshow crowd as if we were a massed group. I was in the next-to-last element. The OV-1 Mohawks followed us. It looked to my 23 year old eyes like the bomber stream out of England.

I should mention for the o/p that if a dozen or so military aircraft departed point A for the same point B at about the same time they would probably have collisions if they were not in formation. It is safer to keep sight of each other. Talking non-combat mission here.



Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlineLAXintl From United States of America, joined May 2000, 25059 posts, RR: 46
Reply 14, posted (5 years 10 months 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 12185 times:

Another reason is for radar signature, particularly a tight formation can appear as a single target on more basic radar systems.
I've known more then one occasion when either civilian ATC, or even military controllers identified only a single target that turned out to be a flight of 3+ planes.



From the desert to the sea, to all of Southern California
User currently offlineFerrypilot From New Zealand, joined Sep 2006, 897 posts, RR: 3
Reply 15, posted (5 years 10 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 12148 times:



Quoting SlamClick (Reply 13):
I was once in a 144-ship of mixed fixed- and rotary-wing aircraft.

...Cool !!


User currently offlineDragon6172 From United States of America, joined Jul 2007, 1202 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (5 years 10 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 11982 times:

I remember doing an EMCON launch with about 50 or so helo's out at Yuma, AZ. Pretty amazing to get that many helo's started, taxied in sequence, and then take off without a single radio transmission. The whole idea is to keep anyone from listening to the freq's and knowing we are coming. Tower ruined the whole thing as we made our turn on course though. Cessna was approaching towers airspace...."Cessna N27275 cleared for the downwind, you have traffic at 1 oclock, a whole bunch of helicopters". Geez thanks, haha.


Phrogs Phorever
User currently offlineNicoEDDF From Germany, joined Jan 2008, 1099 posts, RR: 1
Reply 17, posted (5 years 10 months 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 11838 times:

Hey altogether,

thank you lots for all the insights!  Smile

Always a pleasure to learn here!


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Military Reason For Formation Flying
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why No Military Name For The JT8-D? posted Wed Aug 2 2006 01:37:35 by 747400sp
Can Someone Explain Military Regs For Me! posted Mon Jun 27 2005 16:00:06 by Chris78cpr
F16 + P51 Formation Flying posted Thu Mar 31 2005 11:18:08 by HAWK21M
Military Use For Sonic Cruiser posted Fri Aug 30 2002 12:13:12 by Zauberfloete
Looking For Some Military Planes Unit Price posted Wed Jul 19 2006 22:53:34 by Chrisdigo
For Military Buffs - Hypothetical Re Carrier Group posted Wed Jun 7 2006 22:52:21 by AerospaceFan
Russian AF To Do Stunt-flying In China For Big $$$ posted Wed Mar 1 2006 23:16:00 by USAFHummer
Mag-Lev For The Military posted Mon Feb 27 2006 22:02:10 by TIMC
747 Military Usage - Any Hope For A380? posted Thu Dec 1 2005 21:49:12 by Hrhf1
747SP Flying Telescope For Nasa And German DLR posted Mon May 30 2005 23:46:26 by Columba

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format