Sponsor Message:
Military Aviation & Space Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
What Is The Future Of The Mig Design Bureau  
User currently offlineAlberchico From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3055 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 3 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 12072 times:

It seems that the company is going downhill right now. They lost the 5th generation fighter contest to Sukhoi, they lost the jet trainer competition to the yak-130, they are not really inolved in any major civil aircraft projects, with Sukhoi in charge of the Russian regional jet, their MIG-35 has been flying around without any orders, still waiting for the results of the Indian fighter competition. I believe that Sukhoi will become the future of Russian aerospace while Mig is a dying enterprise like McDonnel Douglas was in the 90's.

Any thoughts ???

[Edited 2008-11-11 18:02:01]

short summary of every jewish holiday: they tried to kill us ,we won , lets eat !
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineFridgmus From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 1442 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (7 years 3 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 11945 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hire some of Sukhoi's Engineers maybe?

I'd hate to see MIG go down the tubes. They built some really great aircraft.

Maybe Obama will get a bail-out package going for them!

The Lockheed Super Constellation, the REAL Queen of the Skies!
User currently offlineJackonicko From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2008, 472 posts, RR: 11
Reply 2, posted (7 years 3 months 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 11829 times:

"Hire some of Sukhoi's Engineers maybe?"

That would only further dilute MiG's design expertise.....

Sukhoi's inexorable rise has been based on Simonov's political savvy, not on any superiority in design or engineering expertise. As things changed in Russia, MiG under Belyakov and Waldenburg seemed old-style and Stalinist, while Simonov was more modern and more liberal.

Thus while the MiG-29K and MiG-29M withered, the Su-27IB, Su-27PU and Su-27M continued, just as MiG-29 upgrades were never funded as generously as Su-27 modification programmes.

And thanks to their contacts and influence, Sukhoi were allowed to pioneer the most innovative reforms, integrating the Design Bureau with its production plants, while MiG struggled on alone, deprived of Russian orders, and able to do little more than sell off modestly upgraded unsold white tails from Lukhovitskii.

And MiG had their own senior people replaced by people parachuted in from Sukhoi - people like Nikitin - leading many to assume that MiG was being softened up for a takeover. There have been a few moves away from that process, but not enough.

MiG were a great organisation, and despite the 'Stalinist' reputation, always seemed to have real old world charm that equalled their design genius. But personally, and with great regret, I don't think that MiG can survive. I look forward to being proved wrong.

User currently offlineFridgmus From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 1442 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (7 years 3 months 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 11686 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Jackonicko (Reply 2):

I had no idea!

Thanks for the heads-up Jack. thumbsup 


The Lockheed Super Constellation, the REAL Queen of the Skies!
User currently offlineR2rho From Spain, joined Feb 2007, 3447 posts, RR: 2
Reply 4, posted (7 years 3 months 19 hours ago) and read 11446 times:

Actually, MiG and Sukhoi (along with most of the Russian aerospacece industry) are being merged into OAK, a sort of Russian EADS. The future for MiG must be to find its niche inside OAK, specializing in the design of certain aircraft within the group. I really hope MiG's design expertise doesn't disappear with the creation of OAK... it would be a huge mistake.


User currently offlineSovietjet From Bulgaria, joined Mar 2003, 2717 posts, RR: 16
Reply 5, posted (7 years 3 months 16 hours ago) and read 11398 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I think "Mig" is a term recognized globally much more than "Sukhoi". Particularly whenever the words "russian" and "fighter" are mentioned people usually think about Mig first and not Sukhoi.

User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 30267 posts, RR: 57
Reply 6, posted (7 years 3 months 15 hours ago) and read 11363 times:

You know why...People like saying "Mig" better.

It is sort of like how people prefered to say, "Salsa" instead of "Ketchup"

User currently offlineSCAT15F From United States of America, joined Feb 2007, 402 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (7 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 11168 times:

The Mig bureau did come up with, and actually flew, the Mig 1.44, which, until the PAK-FA flies, is still the most advanced and highest performance Russian fighter ever built. In fact, the PAK-FA will be nearly identical in configuration and performance- but more than a dozen years later.

That's got to count for something.

I also think a good new-production Mig-31 upgrade is in order: more powerful/fuel efficient engines, more composites, newer wing, higher g-loading, and top speed upgraded to mach 3.2-3.5 with mach 2 supercruise capability.  duck 

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic What Is The Future Of The Mig Design Bureau
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Military aviation related posts only!
  • Not military related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What Is The Second Oldest Active Military Aircraft posted Wed Jun 4 2008 15:40:30 by ACW367
What Is The Deal With The Space Shuttle? posted Sun Jan 6 2008 21:01:20 by BR715-A1-30
Space Exploration: What Is The Business Case? posted Wed Nov 29 2006 23:44:44 by Lehpron
What Is The Latest On Rutan's Space Ship 2? posted Thu Sep 21 2006 02:08:36 by CTR
What Is The Deadliest Russian Fighter? posted Thu Jul 27 2006 06:10:51 by ThirtyEcho
What Is The Loudest Jet To Get Lunch Off A Carrier posted Wed Jul 26 2006 20:58:56 by 747400sp
What Is The A400M Airlifter? posted Thu Jul 20 2006 16:57:38 by Mlglaw
What Is The Power Output Of A Super Nova? posted Thu Jan 12 2006 22:50:48 by Lehpron
What Is The Best Fighter The US Ever Had. posted Sun Mar 6 2005 05:56:03 by 747400sp
What Is The Story On The C-32B? posted Mon Jan 10 2005 20:32:23 by FlyMeToTheMoon

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format