Print from Airliners.net discussion forum
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/non_aviation/read.main/1136112/

Topic: 6 Months Later - John Bolton At The UN
Username: Cfalk
Posted 2006-03-04 10:50:24 and read 1615 times.

After all the yelling and screaming last year, Bolton has now been Ambassador to the UN for over 6 months now, and he hasn't started a war yet.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060303/...u=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--

Here's a little piece on his latest activities, which I think is quite indicative of the culture he is up against. My father in law worked at such high levels in the UN, and he told me that actually getting people to do any work there is like trying to get orange juice out of the ass of an elephant.

So how do you think he's been doing? Has he been a good ambassador? Should he get confirmed by the Senate this session?

Topic: RE: 6 Months Later - John Bolton At The UN
Username: Kevinl1011
Posted 2006-03-04 10:55:06 and read 1614 times.

Is he related Michael Bolton?  Wink

Topic: RE: 6 Months Later - John Bolton At The UN
Username: A319XFW
Posted 2006-03-04 11:41:11 and read 1600 times.

Quoting Kevinl1011 (Reply 1):
Is he related Michael Bolton?

 rotfl  That's exactly the same question I was going to ask!

Quote:
As for the morning briefings, "this is impossible," he said. "We aren't having a daily briefing each day."

And there was me thinking that 'daily' meant every day Big grin

Topic: RE: 6 Months Later - John Bolton At The UN
Username: HatTrick
Posted 2006-03-04 16:51:47 and read 1568 times.

Quoting Cfalk (Thread starter):
and he hasn't started a war yet.

That comment smacks of flamebait. Besides, Bush has plenty of others fit for that task (touche').
Given Bolton's past comments about the U.N, it is highly unlikely he will be well recieved as a person, let alone an Ambassador leading the "U.S. campaign to reform the United Nations"

Topic: RE: 6 Months Later - John Bolton At The UN
Username: Cfalk
Posted 2006-03-04 19:47:06 and read 1553 times.

Quoting HatTrick (Reply 3):
Given Bolton's past comments about the U.N, it is highly unlikely he will be well recieved as a person, let alone an Ambassador leading the "U.S. campaign to reform the United Nations"

Are you saying that his demands are unreasonable? That the UN is above things like professionalism, integrity and results?

Like I said, my father-in-law was in the UN. He's a workaholic. He's 75 now and still can't sit still for more than 5 minutes. You can imagine how well that fit in at the UN. He was the only guy in his division that actually did any work, simply by showing up more than 2 hours per day. He was making all the rest look bad, so they fired him. (Not exactly fired - he was a civil servant for his own government, but he was no longer welcome to work at the UN!)

He has great stories about those days at the UN. But by far the most infuriating is how the UN is full of people just jerking off 95% of the time. All of us (whatever country you live in) contribute to these guys' salaries. Doesn't that make you mad?

Topic: RE: 6 Months Later - John Bolton At The UN
Username: Klaus
Posted 2006-03-04 23:02:19 and read 1539 times.

If Bolton should actually contribute to increased effectiveness in the UN administration, I'm all for it. But the primary problems regarding the UN are not on the administrative level but in the unwillingness of several member nations to get things forward. Administrative issues have been misused as a pretense to prevent any political progress - we'll see if there will be any constructive movement all in all...

Topic: RE: 6 Months Later - John Bolton At The UN
Username: RJpieces
Posted 2006-03-04 23:58:46 and read 1528 times.

From what I've read, Bolton has been facing tough opposotion to reform there but doing a worthwhile job.

I am supposed to hear him speak tomorrow. I will post the highlights.

Topic: RE: 6 Months Later - John Bolton At The UN
Username: Halls120
Posted 2006-03-05 01:33:25 and read 1516 times.

Quoting Cfalk (Thread starter):
My father in law worked at such high levels in the UN, and he told me that actually getting people to do any work there is like trying to get orange juice out of the ass of an elephant.

 rotfl  As a veteran of numerous US delegations to various UN meetings, I can say with absolute confidence your father in law was dead on correct.

Quoting Cfalk (Thread starter):
So how do you think he's been doing? Has he been a good ambassador? Should he get confirmed by the Senate this session?

He should, but he won't. All it takes is one senator to hold something up, and Bolton has many enemies on the hill.

Quoting Cfalk (Reply 4):
He has great stories about those days at the UN. But by far the most infuriating is how the UN is full of people just jerking off 95% of the time. All of us (whatever country you live in) contribute to these guys' salaries. Doesn't that make you mad?

You're overdoing it. 90% would be more accurate.

Here is a typical UN meeting.

Published start time - 10am. Actual start time - 10:30, if you're lucky.

If it is a multi-day meeting, the chair will typically ask member states NOT to make long winded oral statements about country achievements, asking that they instead submit their statements in writing. Predictably, everyone ignores the chair, and the first day is a waste of time.

Lunch break begins at 1pm.

afternoon session published start time - 3pm. actual start time - 3:15

people start drifting out at 4pm to get a cup of coffee before the coffee bar closes, and to smoke - even though the building is a smoke free area.

At 6pm, the session ends. If you are lucky, you've actually had 5 hours of susbstantive meeting time.

Quoting Klaus (Reply 5):
If Bolton should actually contribute to increased effectiveness in the UN administration, I'm all for it. But the primary problems regarding the UN are not on the administrative level but in the unwillingness of several member nations to get things forward.

You couldn't be more wrong. The UN professional staff is riddled with incompetency, sexual harassment, and general misconduct. The work environment at two UN locations is so poisonous that UN employees won't be seen with visiting delegations from their home countries, lest UN management suspect they are being disloyal. In response, it is common for country delegations to host their UN employee nationals at off site meetings held in quiet out of the way places. Last year at one UN meeting, it was very awkward for several of us from the UN delegation when we happened to choose a resataurant that was also being used for a meeting of UN employees from a certain unnamed EU country and their delegation.

Topic: RE: 6 Months Later - John Bolton At The UN
Username: Klaus
Posted 2006-03-05 02:00:03 and read 1506 times.

That does not in any way contradict my statement - as long as several UNSC member nations see it as their primary mission to keep the UN toothless and/or obedient, there is not much of an incentive to clean up the administration (which - it needs to be repeated - is a subordinate executive organ, while the actual decisions are still made by the member governments).

It is nice if the administration should in fact be improved, but as long as the actual essential issues aren't moved forward, this is a minor side issue, at most good for a diversion from the important topics.

Topic: RE: 6 Months Later - John Bolton At The UN
Username: Halls120
Posted 2006-03-05 02:29:46 and read 1498 times.

Quoting Klaus (Reply 8):
It is nice if the administration should in fact be improved, but as long as the actual essential issues aren't moved forward, this is a minor side issue, at most good for a diversion from the important topics.

While I understand your point about the bigger issues on the table, for the unfortunate employees that labor under UN mismamgement, it is far from being a minor issue.

Topic: RE: 6 Months Later - John Bolton At The UN
Username: DeltaGator
Posted 2006-03-05 02:54:57 and read 1489 times.

Quoting Cfalk (Thread starter):
So how do you think he's been doing? Has he been a good ambassador? Should he get confirmed by the Senate this session?

I think he has a tough hill to climb given the Democratic opposition to his placement on the US side and the ineffectiveness of the UN on the international side. I'm glad to see though that some folks from other countries find the UN to be full of a bunch of clowns. While in principle the idea of the UN is a good one in practice it is completely broken. The good thing is with the ineffectiveness Kofi Annan won't get through his master plan of usurping national sovereignty and placing the UN as the global head or the Internet control he so desperately wants as well.

Topic: RE: 6 Months Later - John Bolton At The UN
Username: Klaus
Posted 2006-03-05 11:17:23 and read 1469 times.

Yeah, DeltaGator, thank you for an excellent demonstration of the kind of ignorant paranoia that's the problem here.  crazy 

Topic: RE: 6 Months Later - John Bolton At The UN
Username: DeltaGator
Posted 2006-03-05 21:02:39 and read 1457 times.

Quoting Klaus (Reply 11):
Yeah, DeltaGator, thank you for an excellent demonstration of the kind of ignorant paranoia that's the problem here.

Just some of the ideas that have come out of the UN. Again, in principle it is a good thing. In practice, it is broken. The same could be said for many governments worldwide.

Topic: RE: 6 Months Later - John Bolton At The UN
Username: Cfalk
Posted 2006-03-05 21:33:47 and read 1451 times.

Quoting DeltaGator (Reply 12):
Quoting Klaus (Reply 11):
Yeah, DeltaGator, thank you for an excellent demonstration of the kind of ignorant paranoia that's the problem here.

Just some of the ideas that have come out of the UN. Again, in principle it is a good thing. In practice, it is broken. The same could be said for many governments worldwide.

I think Klaus is talking about the quote below.

Quoting DeltaGator (Reply 10):
The good thing is with the ineffectiveness Kofi Annan won't get through his master plan of usurping national sovereignty and placing the UN as the global head or the Internet control he so desperately wants as well.

I agree with what you said about the UN being a good idea, but broken. But the above statement smacks a bit of conspiracy theories. Personally, I don't think Kofi has the intelligence or the vision to promote such a concept. He is most certainly the worst Secretary General that I can remember.

Topic: RE: 6 Months Later - John Bolton At The UN
Username: DeltaGator
Posted 2006-03-05 21:39:36 and read 1448 times.

Quoting Cfalk (Reply 13):
I think Klaus is talking about the quote below.

I know.

Quoting Cfalk (Reply 13):
Personally, I don't think Kofi has the intelligence or the vision to promote such a concept. He is most certainly the worst Secretary General that I can remember.

I'm not a huge conspiracy theory guy at all but some of the ideas being put forward by the UN do worry me. Don't underestimate him though despite the red tape he has to work through daily.

Topic: RE: 6 Months Later - John Bolton At The UN
Username: Klaus
Posted 2006-03-06 01:25:00 and read 1436 times.

Quoting DeltaGator (Reply 14):
I'm not a huge conspiracy theory guy at all

Now that's a relief...! Big grin

Quoting DeltaGator (Reply 14):
but some of the ideas being put forward by the UN do worry me.

The UN is not governed by the secretary general but by the member nations' governments. The SG can only make suggestions, but in even more cases his suggestions have originated among the member governments.

If you want to "un-break" the UN, start campaigning in Washington. The Iraq invasion was a prime example how to break the UN. So what shall it be?

Topic: RE: 6 Months Later - John Bolton At The UN
Username: Halls120
Posted 2006-03-06 02:29:28 and read 1424 times.

Quoting Klaus (Reply 15):
The UN is not governed by the secretary general but by the member nations' governments. The SG can only make suggestions, but in even more cases his suggestions have originated among the member governments.

Oh really?

Here is how the UN describes the duties and authority of the UN SG.

Quote:
The Charter describes the Secretary-General as "chief administrative officer" of the Organization, who shall act in that capacity and perform "such other functions as are entrusted" to him or her by the Security Council, General Assembly, Economic and Social Council and other United Nations organs. The Charter also empowers the Secretary-General to "bring to the attention of the Security Council any matter which in his opinion may threaten the maintenance of international peace and security". These guidelines both define the powers of the office and grant it considerable scope for action. The Secretary-General would fail if he did not take careful account of the concerns of Member States, but he must also uphold the values and moral authority of the United Nations, and speak and act for peace, even at the risk, from time to time, of challenging or disagreeing with those same Member States.

Topic: RE: 6 Months Later - John Bolton At The UN
Username: Klaus
Posted 2006-03-06 03:09:45 and read 1418 times.

Which puts exactly zero executive decision powers into the hands of the secretary general.

Topic: RE: 6 Months Later - John Bolton At The UN
Username: Halls120
Posted 2006-03-06 03:29:18 and read 1413 times.

Quoting Klaus (Reply 17):
Which puts exactly zero executive decision powers into the hands of the secretary general.

True. But he is more than just a suggestion generator, which is what you have implied.

Topic: RE: 6 Months Later - John Bolton At The UN
Username: Klaus
Posted 2006-03-06 03:49:42 and read 1408 times.

Sure. But almost all the ills people are so used to complaining about are actually dependent on the member governments to resolve. The administrative reform is a minor side show compared to the central issues.


The messages in this discussion express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of Airliners.net or any entity associated with Airliners.net.

Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved.
http://www.airliners.net/