Print from Airliners.net discussion forum
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/non_aviation/read.main/2470646/

Topic: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: MD-90
Posted 2012-11-18 20:02:16 and read 2580 times.

I'd like to see Notre Dame get donkey stomped by Alabama (to use an LSU euphemism for winning) even though the thought of Bama winning another legit national title makes me wanna    Especially since Alabama claims 1973 as one of their 14 national championships even though Notre Dame beat them 24-23 in the Sugar Bowl that year.

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: AirframeAS
Posted 2012-11-19 05:25:30 and read 2581 times.

I don't get the BCS (a totally flawed format that's broken) bowls and how the selectin works. If ND can go to the National Title Game as an Independant, then why couldn't Boise State play in a BCS game, like they could have in 2005 (I think....the Fiesta Bowl win over Oklahoma)?

Boise State got shafted that year going undefeated. I prefer we have a playoff format instead.

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: GSPflyer
Posted 2012-11-19 05:40:31 and read 2580 times.

The winner of the SEC championship (barring either team losing this week) will go to the National Championship game. This means Georgia, who my Gamecocks beat the Hell out of 35-7, has a chance to win the title. I will be so pissed if that happens.

And Notre Dame will go, barring a loss to Southern Cal this weekend. I just read Barkley is out, so I don't see Notre Dame losing, but who knows. No one saw Oregon and K-State losing this past weekend.

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 1):
I don't get the BCS (a totally flawed format that's broken) bowls and how the selectin works. If ND can go to the National Title Game as an Independant, then why couldn't Boise State play in a BCS game, like they could have in 2005 (I think....the Fiesta Bowl win over Oklahoma)?

Boise State got shafted that year going undefeated. I prefer we have a playoff format instead.

Simply, strength of schedule. Boise usually plays 1 BCS Automatic Qualifier school per season, and it's always at a neutral site. Notre Dame plays Southern Cal, Stanford, Michigan, Michigan State, Oklahoma, and Purdue. That's not an easy schedule.

Not saying that's right, but that's how they do it. I feel like any undefeated team should have a shot at the National Championship. The system pisses me off because their argument for keeping it is "the regular season is like the playoffs." In that case, wouldn't you be eliminated with one loss? I really hated the 2008 season, when Florida (who had one loss, at home, against an unranked team) played for, and won, the national championship, while an undefeated Utah team beat Alabama in the Sugar Bowl.

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: casinterest
Posted 2012-11-19 06:43:17 and read 2580 times.

Quoting GSPflyer (Reply 2):
s means Georgia, who my Gamecocks beat the Hell out of 35-7, has a chance to win the title. I will be so pissed if that happens.

Well, ,my Gators spanked you guys 44-11 and then lost to Georgian 9-17.


The BCS will go nuts should Notre Dame lose this week. The winner of the SEC championship might have to play Florida, if Florida beats Florida state.  

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: gatorman96
Posted 2012-11-19 07:56:00 and read 2580 times.

Quoting MD-90 (Thread starter):
I'd like to see Notre Dame get donkey stomped by Alabama (to use an LSU euphemism for winning) even though the thought of Bama winning another legit national title makes me wanna

I hate that I have to pull for Lane Kiffin, although they have very little chance with Barkley out. ND truly had the luck of the Irish against Stanford and Pitt.

Any of the top 6 teams have the potential to play in the BCS championship game. The next few weeks could be very interesting!

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: vikkyvik
Posted 2012-11-19 08:01:48 and read 2580 times.

Quoting gatorman96 (Reply 4):
I hate that I have to pull for Lane Kiffin, although they have very little chance with Barkley out.

We would have very little chance with Barkley in.

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: iFlyLOTs
Posted 2012-11-19 08:18:39 and read 2580 times.

What I don't get is how Oregon fell to 5th when the same thing happened to Alabama and they only fell to 4th..
But for the national championship, I just don't want the SEC to win it again.. I'm tired of them.

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: dl021
Posted 2012-11-19 09:14:14 and read 2581 times.

The difference between Notre Dames schedule and Boise State's is night and day. The weight of the schedule is so different in college that the some of the ideas ideas folks have about pro-style playoffs making everything right and fair are fantasy. There is a playoff system needed, but NCAA football still needs ranking systems to achieve any measure of reatlity to the outcomes for the seasons.

An SEC schedule beats the hell out of most others, and there is no other team that deliberately schedules their seasons like Notre Dame....just not that many patsies they put up there. Love them or hate them, and it seems to be one or the other, they play a real schedule and for them to be undefeated at this point indicates that they're a great team. My Bulldogs are ranked 3rd and I have to admit that they're not as solid a third as ND is a first. That said, it's pretty cool that UGA controls it's own destiny right now. Three large hurdles to clear, and anyone discounting the rivalry with GaTech is just being contrary....those kids are UP for this game....and then Alabama at the SEC championship, but it's doable. One game at a time.

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: Gatorman96
Posted 2012-11-19 12:01:49 and read 2580 times.

Quoting vikkyvik (Reply 5):
Quoting gatorman96 (Reply 4):
I hate that I have to pull for Lane Kiffin, although they have very little chance with Barkley out.

We would have very little chance with Barkley in.

Agreed, but considering my allegiance, I am trying to view this weekend half glass very full...

Quoting dl021 (Reply 7):
Three large hurdles to clear, and anyone discounting the rivalry with GaTech is just being contrary....those kids are UP for this game

Especially with what is now at stake for UGA. Ga Tech will bring the heat. Fortunately it is a home game for you.

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: Ken777
Posted 2012-11-19 13:28:37 and read 2580 times.

I'll go with Notre Dame this year. There is going to be a while before anyone else gets on my list. Probably Alabama - just so Notre Dame can take them down  

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: AirframeAS
Posted 2012-11-19 13:31:51 and read 2580 times.

Quoting iFlyLOTs (Reply 6):
I just don't want the SEC to win it again.. I'm tired of them.

   You, me and millions of other college football fans!

Some of you brought up the strength of schedule. I'm not buying that. Strength of schedule should not matter as not everyone's schedule is fairly balanced out. It's stupid.

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: MD-90
Posted 2012-11-19 13:37:29 and read 2580 times.

Quoting casinterest (Reply 3):
The BCS will go nuts should Notre Dame lose this week. The winner of the SEC championship might have to play Florida, if Florida beats Florida state.

And my god would the rest of the nation hate us for it.  

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: ouboy79
Posted 2012-11-19 16:12:05 and read 2580 times.

Quoting iFlyLOTs (Reply 6):
What I don't get is how Oregon fell to 5th when the same thing happened to Alabama and they only fell to 4th..
But for the national championship, I just don't want the SEC to win it again.. I'm tired of them.

Agree with what you are saying. The SEC also does it scheduling well. They back load the cupcakes at the end of the season to pad things. Whereas most of the other school are finishing out conference play this time of year. Look at how many FCS schools the SEC played this past week. It is all about securing BCS rights and Heisman standings.

As far as bias in the polls, if we took out the humans completely and just looked at the computers the last three weeks, this is what we get. The number in parenthesis is their actual ranking with humans.

Week 11
1) Alabama (1)
2) Notre Dame (4)
3) Kansas State (2)
4) Florida (6)
5) Oregon (3)
6) Georgia (5)
7) LSU (7)
8t) South Carolina (8)
8t) Oregon State (11)
10) Oklahoma (12)

Week 12
1) Notre Dame (3)
2) Kansas State (1)
3) Florida (6)
4) Oregon (2)
5) Alabama (4)
6) Georgia (5)
7) LSU (7)
8t) Texas A&M (8)
8t) South Carolina (9)
10) Oklahoma (12)

Week 13 - Current Week
1) Notre Dame (1)
2) Florida (4)
3) Alabama (2)
4) Kansas State (6)
5) Stanford (8)
6) Georgia (3)
7) Oregon (5)
8) LSU (7)
9) Oklahoma (13)
10) Texas A&M (9)

So what this tells me is voters definitely want the SEC more than anything. The computers are trying to correct it by actually following what they are doing on the field. Though I don't really agree in Alabama jumped 2 spots for beating an FCS team, it is what it is.

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: AirframeAS
Posted 2012-11-19 16:22:59 and read 2582 times.

Quoting ouboy79 (Reply 12):
So what this tells me is voters definitely want the SEC more than anything.

The voters always wants the SEC in every National Title game. It's annoying.

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: 3DoorsDown
Posted 2012-11-19 17:13:39 and read 2580 times.

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 10):
Strength of schedule should not matter as not everyone's schedule is fairly balanced out. It's stupid.


Seriously? You think the a WAC teams schedule is on the same level as a SEC or PAC 12. Well OK maybe a PAC 12.

I hope ND and 'Bama go at it and 'Bama gets their tide flushed.

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: Gatorman96
Posted 2012-11-19 18:13:36 and read 2580 times.

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 10):
Some of you brought up the strength of schedule. I'm not buying that. Strength of schedule should not matter as not everyone's schedule is fairly balanced out. It's stupid.

So what other metric should the BCS use? Are you telling me that a one loss K State team is equal to a one loss Bama team? In the last decade, the SEC has beaten Oklahoma in '03, OSU in '06 and '07, Oklahoma in '08, Texas '09, Oregon '10, and LSU in '11. Sure you're bored of the SEC, but until a team outside the SEC wins the NC, how can anyone complain when the SEC is in the end of the season BCS mix?

We need a playoff, fast...

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: EA CO AS
Posted 2012-11-19 18:20:13 and read 2580 times.

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 1):
why couldn't Boise State play in a BCS game

If Boise State would stop scheduling the majority of their games against the likes of East Upchuck State Tech they might actually get some BCS respect. Until then...

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: 3DoorsDown
Posted 2012-11-19 18:20:32 and read 2580 times.

Quoting Gatorman96 (Reply 15):

We need a playoff, fast...

Agreed. And not a 4 team. It should be 8.

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: EA CO AS
Posted 2012-11-19 18:27:55 and read 2580 times.

Quoting 3DoorsDown (Reply 17):
Agreed. And not a 4 team. It should be 8.

Ten. Four teams from east of the Mississippi, four teams from west of the Mississippi, and two at-large spots.

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: Gatorman96
Posted 2012-11-19 18:59:21 and read 2580 times.

Quoting EA CO AS (Reply 18):
Ten. Four teams from east of the Mississippi, four teams from west of the Mississippi, and two at-large spots.

8 teams from states along the Interstate 10 corridor, Georgia, Oregon, and two at large bids...

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: jpetekyxmd80
Posted 2012-11-19 19:11:11 and read 2582 times.

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 10):
Strength of schedule should not matter as not everyone's schedule is fairly balanced out. It's stupid.

I think you pointed out the exact reason why it does, and should matter.

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: AirframeAS
Posted 2012-11-19 19:23:48 and read 2580 times.

Quoting 3DoorsDown (Reply 14):
You think the a WAC teams schedule is on the same level as a SEC or PAC 12.

I never said it was. C'mon now. I said that not everyone's schedules are balanced out fairly.

Quoting Gatorman96,reply=15So what other metric should the BCS use?][/quote]

As others have said, a playoff format. Pit all the conference champs in a bracket style playoffs.

[quote=jpetekyxmd80
(Reply 20):
should matter.

Disagree.

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: jpetekyxmd80
Posted 2012-11-19 19:31:13 and read 2580 times.

More or less, strength of schedule acts as tiebreakers between similar teams. Of course some teams can't really compete if their conference is poor or in a down year. But if SOS is not an important factor at the top, what should be?

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: AirframeAS
Posted 2012-11-19 19:41:14 and read 2580 times.

Quoting jpetekyxmd80 (Reply 22):
But if SOS is not an important factor at the top, what should be?

I'm glad you asked! Record and offensive points earned. That would solve sime if the tie breaker problems.

This is why I hate the SOS argument: Stanford beats Oregon. Oregon is obviously the better team, right? But they lost that game. SOS does not apply here, IMO, it's how the team performs on the field and their record.

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: jpetekyxmd80
Posted 2012-11-19 19:56:00 and read 2580 times.

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 23):

I'm glad you asked! Record and offensive points earned. That would solve sime if the tie breaker problems.

That's kind of a crazy idea.

Say, for purpose of discussion, Louisiana Tech had beaten Utah State on Saturday and got to 10-1. They're in a bad conference, have't beaten a ranked team, but have scored more points than anyone in the country. You're saying they should then be #2 and playing Notre Dame in the national championship game?

Your idea would absolutely destroy college football.

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: AirframeAS
Posted 2012-11-19 19:59:02 and read 2595 times.

Quoting jpetekyxmd80 (Reply 24):
Your idea would absolutely destroy college football.

Then what do you suggest?

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: jpetekyxmd80
Posted 2012-11-19 20:06:42 and read 2597 times.

First off, you are severely biased against defense with your points scored tiebreaker. Some of the best teams are focused around their defense, and don't score a lot of points. And some really crappy conferences with habitually bad defenses are used to football scores looking like basketball scores. That should be rewarded? Alabama scored a lot of points last year, but there are always 9-6 grind it out SEC games between top teams. They probably wouldn't have won any points scored competitions, but they had the best defense in the country, and without a doubt were the best team in the country.

I think you're going for a MOV- (margin of victory) argument. That was actually recently eliminated from the BCS computers to essentially improve sportsmanship after people got upset with Oregon and Wisconsin laying 80+ points on teams. I'd be onboard with margin of victory being more important (in tandem with SOS), but the benefit should top out around a 30 point win.

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: Gatorman96
Posted 2012-11-19 20:13:32 and read 2606 times.

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 23):
I'm glad you asked! Record and offensive points earned. That would solve sime if the tie breaker problems.

This is why I hate the SOS argument: Stanford beats Oregon. Oregon is obviously the better team, right? But they lost that game. SOS does not apply here, IMO, it's how the team performs on the field and their record.

Eh? Total points proves nothing. Do you honestly think Oregon would score the same amount of points if they played in the SEC or Big 10 for that matter? The defenses are significantly better in both conferences. No offense to the Pac 12, but defense is not stressed whatsoever. Look what happened to West Virginia and Oregon when they play a team whose defense has a pulse. Oregon's schedule is truly pathetic...

Three teams in the top 25 (Stanford, 8th, OSU, 16th and Arizona, 23), and the rest of the teams have an average rank of 62/124 (Tennessee Tech not included, ranked outside of top 124)...

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: Gatorman96
Posted 2012-11-19 20:15:38 and read 2607 times.

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 25):

Then what do you suggest?

It's as good as it will get without a playoff system...Let's not forget Ohio State though. If they weren't on probation, OSU/ND would be the frontrunners for the NC game.

[Edited 2012-11-19 20:26:30]

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: iFlyLOTs
Posted 2012-11-19 20:45:41 and read 2608 times.

Quoting Gatorman96 (Reply 27):
Do you honestly think Oregon would score the same amount of points if they played in the SEC or Big 10 for that matter?

Are we forgetting that the Big 10 has the likes of mighty Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Purdue, and Minnesota in it? Oregon beat ASU which at the time had one of the top 10 defenses in the country, a game where Oregon scored 44 points in less than 20 minutes.

Oregon doesn't have a crap defense either, they did hold Arizona scoreless. They would still be a good team, they would still be able to win 90% of their games, would the margin be as big? No. But the Big 10 is over-rated, especially this year.

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: Gatorman96
Posted 2012-11-20 05:08:00 and read 2609 times.

Quoting iFlyLOTs (Reply 29):
They would still be a good team, they would still be able to win 90% of their games, would the margin be as big? No. But the Big 10 is over-rated, especially this year.

If Oregon was in the Big 10 (or 18, whatever they are now), the defenses of Penn State, Nebraska, Wisconsin, MSU, Michigan, would adjust and adapt to Oregon's offense, making it much less effective. The offensive effectiveness would be even less if Oregon were in the SEC (see Oregon vs Auburn and LSU).

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: nonrevman
Posted 2012-11-20 12:43:52 and read 2603 times.

Quoting AirframeAS (Reply 10):
I just don't want the SEC to win it again.. I'm tired of them.

You, me and millions of other college football fans!

I will just be happy if it is not SEC vs SEC. The only thing worse than an SEC team in the big game again would be a rematch of two of them.

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: dl021
Posted 2012-11-23 12:51:54 and read 2520 times.

Quoting nonrevman (Reply 31):
will just be happy if it is not SEC vs SEC. The only thing worse than an SEC team in the big game again would be a rematch of two of them.

according to non-SEC fans who secretly wish their teams were playing in the best conference in college football but are more secretly happier that they don't have to because they'd have to play more SEC teams.

Topic: RE: Who's Going To Play For The BCS Championship? (US)
Username: doug_Or
Posted 2012-11-23 14:25:39 and read 2511 times.

Quoting dl021 (Reply 7):
Love them or hate them, and it seems to be one or the other, they play a real schedule and for them to be undefeated at this point indicates that they're a great team.

This combined with using student players instead of unpaid professionals is why I respect ND. And that's coming from a Boilermaker.


The messages in this discussion express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of Airliners.net or any entity associated with Airliners.net.

Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved.
http://www.airliners.net/