Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Listen To John P. Murtha About Iraq War!  
User currently offlineBofredrik From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2129 times:

http://www.house.gov/apps/list/press/pa12_murtha/pr051117iraq.html

"Our military has done everything that has been asked of them, the U.S. can not accomplish anything further in Iraq militarily. IT IS TIME TO BRING THEM HOME."

33 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineWellHung From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2118 times:

"I like guys who've never been there that criticize us who've been there. I like that. I like guys who got five deferments and never been there and send people to war, and then don't like to hear suggestions about what needs to be done."

 rotfl   rotfl   rotfl 
 rotfl   rotfl   rotfl 
 rotfl   rotfl   rotfl 


User currently offlineMt99 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 6609 posts, RR: 6
Reply 2, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2115 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I dont think "bailing" is a good move. It too late.

How about asking the UN to help? Turn the country over the the International Community?



Step into my office, baby
User currently offlineFalcon84 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2108 times:

Here's a CNN article on the story:

http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/11/17/murtha.iraq/index.html

I think what is just reprehinsible is the White House-THE WHITE HOUSE, stooping the the level of bringing up Michael Moore's name in their defense against a well-respected Democratic Congressman, who is seen as one of the more conservative memebers of the Democratic party on issues of foreign policy. Is the WH that desperate these days?

I think it also interesting the Sen Kerry disagrees-as I do-with Murtha's call for immediate withdrawl from Iraq. We can't do it. We simply that. We owe it to the 2000 Americans who have died there, and we owe it to the Iraqi people.

Withdrawing now will lead to civil war.

Dude has guts to say this publically,and while I disagree with him, I respect his view. I have less respect for the WH's childish response.


User currently offlineDan-Air From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 614 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2095 times:

Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 3):
Withdrawing now will lead to civil war.

Wake up Falcon, the civil war is already in progress. Our guys are nothing but a shield to stop the Shiites blasting the Sunnis - they've been doing that forever and they will continue to do it forever. When we leave the current fighting will intensify until the mullahs in Iran take over. Our continued presence is just more business for the body-bag company and Walter Reed.

The Iraqis have had two years to step up to the plate and start defending themselves. That's enough. Time to get on with "democracy" or whatever they want, start pumping the oil and pay us back for removing Saddam.


User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2094 times:

Quoting Dan-Air (Reply 4):
The Iraqis have had two years to step up to the plate and start defending themselves. That's enough. Time to get on with "democracy" or whatever they want, start pumping the oil and pay us back for removing Saddam.

I'm almost inclined to agree . . . .

Don't anyone  faint  on me . . . .

The Iraqi's have GOT to start doing the job for themselves . . . we cannot and should not be their police force for much longer . . . .


User currently offlineFalcon84 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 2089 times:

Quoting Dan-Air (Reply 4):
The Iraqis have had two years to step up to the plate and start defending themselves.

No, they haven't. The Bush Administration thought it'd be a great idea to dismantle the Iraqi military and police force, which lead to all the looting soon after the invasion part of the war ended, and has left Iraq unable to defend itself. Plus we've done an absolutely piss-poor job reconstituting both.



Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 5):
The Iraqi's have GOT to start doing the job for themselves . . . we cannot and should not be their police force for much longer

Agreed. But we've screwed up that process, and because we did, it'll be at least several years, I'll bet, before we can hand the nation back over to internal security apparatus.


User currently offlineSATX From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 2840 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 2081 times:

Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 3):
Withdrawing now will lead to civil war.

Nothing can stop that now.



Open Season on Consumer Protections is Just Around the Corner...
User currently offlineMt99 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 6609 posts, RR: 6
Reply 8, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 2078 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Dan-Air (Reply 4):
start pumping the oil and pay us back for removing Saddam

Did they askto have Saddam removed? Just wondering.



Step into my office, baby
User currently offlineDan-Air From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 614 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 2075 times:

Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 6):
Agreed. But we've screwed up that process, and because we did, it'll be at least several years, I'll bet, before we can hand the nation back over to internal security apparatus.

That's a nice thought, but didn't we learn recently that the numbers of trained Iraqi security forces is now less than it was a year ago? Put yourself in the shoes of a potential an Iraqi soldier: what incentive is there to get your ass shot at when there's 140,000 yanks around to do that for you?

They are in need of a little tough justice IMHO.


User currently offlineDan-Air From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 614 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 2071 times:

Quoting Mt99 (Reply 8):
Did they askto have Saddam removed? Just wondering.

Nah, that was a bonus. Now where's our $300,000,000,000? Start pumping.


User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 2067 times:

Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 6):
Agreed. But we've screwed up that process, and because we did, it'll be at least several years, I'll bet, before we can hand the nation back over to internal security apparatus.

I'm not totally convinced . . . I think if they had no other options they would. As long as we babysit them, they won't. That's my problem. I don't see a lot of Iraqi military on the front line . . . I don't see a lot of Iraqi police patrolling the streets. Why is that? A combination of lack of enough training and lack of motivation on the Iraqi's part. As long as we're there, they have no motivation to excel.

As an aside, I did see news that the Iraqi Army now has Tanks - T72M1 imported from the Czech Republic I believe . . . they were in storage there from the end of the Cold War . . . the US refurbished them and now they are in Iraq. Interesting we didn't field them with Abrams . . .smart too. I've been up against the T72 - in combat - and it's a dog . . . but I digress . . .


User currently offlineDeltaMD11 From United States of America, joined Dec 2002, 1701 posts, RR: 34
Reply 12, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 2028 times:

Well you know something is wrong when one of the more moderate democrats who has been relatively silent on the war comes out swinging. Murtha is from my home state and for the life of me I have trouble thinking of the last significant move he has made to gain such notoriety. Here is my whole viewpoint on the situation in Iraq:

Pullout from Iraq is not a matter of if, but a matter of when now. I speculate that this process will start sometime next year for several reasons. For one, this war has become immensely unpopular with the American public. Next year, being an election year, politicians are going to start bowing to the public to gain brownie points to get re-elected. After all, what is the primary focus of a politician once he or she is elected? Nine times out of ten it is re-election unless of course you are in a seat that has a term limit and you are in the last term allowable. The Republicans absolutely cannot lose either house of Congress next year, or life is going to become extremely difficult for them. What comes with majority power in Congress? The power to subpoena, and believe you me there are some documents that this current administration DOES NOT want out there. Tie that in with the fact that the Army recently reported that in order to effectively defeat an insurgency the typical rule of thumb is that there should be one soldier per 50 people in an occupied country. You know how many soldiers that translates into in the case of Iraq? Something on the level of 720,000 troops. The United States armed forces are already stretched as thin as they can go, with enlistments all but trickling in. So what is the best option? Declare victory and execute a uniform pullout, leaving enough troops to perhaps secure the borders and nothing more. It's pretty funny, because even Santorum is distancing himself from the President (I recently read that he is some 20 points behind Casey). I thought it would take a crowbar to pry his face out of Bush's ass, guess I was wrong on that one.

Support Our Troops!
Bryan



Too often we ... enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought. - John Fitzgerald Kennedy
User currently offlineUH60FtRucker From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 2022 times:

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 11):
As an aside, I did see news that the Iraqi Army now has Tanks - T72M1 imported from the Czech Republic I believe . . . they were in storage there from the end of the Cold War . . . the US refurbished them and now they are in Iraq. Interesting we didn't field them with Abrams . . .smart too. I've been up against the T72 - in combat - and it's a dog . . . but I digress . . .

Yes, they're putting some newly refurbished T-72s. Iraq contracted an American company to refurbish them after they purchased them from the Czechs.

ANCFlyer - how's the T-72 in combat? Iraq also have a few surviving T-80s, are those any better?

-UH60


User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13140 posts, RR: 15
Reply 14, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 2009 times:

Immediate or short term withdrawal of the USA would be a horrible decision for reasons well noted by leading Republicans. Let us not forget that Iraq has the 2nd largest known reserves of oil in the world. We want to keep that flowing to the Western world and Japan rather than to China or India.
Most of us out there are not aware of this, but in Egypt right now, the Arab League is having a huge, open ended conference to deal with the 'American occupation' of Iraq and related issues as to the USA in the Middle East. Perhaps something from their conference can develop out of it, such as some kind of 'peacekeeping' force or economic investment and development in Iraq so Iraq can survive on it's own and so the USA and other western troops can get out of there. Of course, it isn't the way the USA/Bush want's it, but it might be one of the only ways to deal with the Iraqi situation.


User currently offlineSolarix From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1997 times:

The terrorists want us to give up.

If we leave prematurely, the terrorists will be happy since it means that they will have accomplished their goal.

We've made this mistake before and Bin Laden himself always seems to remind us of it.


User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1992 times:

Quoting UH60FtRucker (Reply 13):
ANCFlyer - how's the T-72 in combat?

In a word - they suck at anything over 1200 meters. Their night vision was terrible - I'm not sure they had any - the range on the cannon even worse. The Auto-Loader was terribly slow . . .we could pump out three cannon rounds in the time it could pump out one. There is no turret floor - so one must chase the cannon around and around. Crew survivability was nil. Not one time did I engage a T72 and see anyone survive. And speaking of engaging - we were managing first round hits at over 5000 meters with the Abrams. Now THAT tank can shoot . . . and we could do it moving.  bigthumbsup 

Mind you I'm talking 1991 here and a different war. I'd be curious to see the mods on the T72M1. Better sights? Turret floor? No way to get rid of the auto-loader though . . . not enough room inside for a 4th crewmember.

Quoting Solarix (Reply 15):
If we leave prematurely, the terrorists will be happy since it means that they will have accomplished their goal.

You have an excellent point . . .

Let me ask this . . . when do we draw the line? When are we going to make the Iraqi's responsible for themselves? When is "too early".

I am and always was an advocate of this war, and obviously a staunch, unwavering supporter of our men and women in uniform where ever they may be, however - when do we let them turn over the responsibility for policing in Iraq to the Iraqis?


User currently offlineSATX From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 2840 posts, RR: 7
Reply 17, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1940 times:

Quoting Solarix (Reply 15):
If we leave prematurely, the terrorists will be happy since it means that they will have accomplished their goal.

The bigger fuckup was when we started the war prematurely.



Open Season on Consumer Protections is Just Around the Corner...
User currently offlineFalcon84 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1936 times:

Quoting Solarix (Reply 15):
If we leave prematurely, the terrorists will be happy since it means that they will have accomplished their goal.

The ironic thing was is that Iraq didn't have those terrorist before we got there. They had Saddam, and now they have terrorism.

How better off are they in the last 2-plus years, really?


User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1933 times:

Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 18):
They had Saddam, and now they have terrorism.

In a literal sense - the same damn thing Falcon . . . CNN, FOX, BBC, no one could report it then . . . his two sons taking whatever 'prize' off the street they wanted . . . his henchmen marching in to whatever/whereever they wanted and hauling people off . . .

No different.

Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 18):
How better off are they in the last 2-plus years, really?

I won't even get started here . . . like I said in another thread, no one listens anyway . . . not even some of the more open-minded folks here.


User currently offlineDaddiesSecret From Niue, joined Sep 2005, 270 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1925 times:

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 5):
The Iraqi's have GOT to start doing the job for themselves . . . we cannot and should not be their police force for much longer . . . .

Oh, come on! This mess is of the 'Coalitions' making! No-one forced the 'Coalition' to go to war. No-one forced the 'Coalition' to disband the Iraqi security services. Having some dreamy eyed idea of forcing western-style democracy on the Iraqis is not enough, especially when that idea goes tits up! The present mess is down to the 'Coalition' you cannot blame the Iraqis for this!

Quoting Dan-Air (Reply 4):
start pumping the oil and pay us back for removing Saddam.

I think if anything the coalition should be compensating the Iraqi for the screw-up it's turned into.


User currently offlineFalcon84 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1923 times:

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 19):
Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 18):
How better off are they in the last 2-plus years, really?

I won't even get started here

Why not, my friend? It's a legit quesiton. Hell, in the last 2 days alone, over 100 Iraqi's killed in attacks, and 5 more of our GI's.

Seriously, if things ARE that much better, why isn't reported-even on a GOP rah-rah channel like FOX?


User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1919 times:

Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 21):
Why not, my friend? It's a legit quesiton. Hell, in the last 2 days alone, over 100 Iraqi's killed in attacks, and 5 more of our GI's.

I don't dispute that, nor did I try to paint a rosey picture, it it certainly far from it.

Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 21):
Seriously, if things ARE that much better, why isn't reported-even on a GOP rah-rah channel like FOX?

The answer is as simple as the one I gave Diamond and Concord977 yesterday . . . it doesn't sell news. It's not any more complicated than that, must to the chagrin of those here, it's just that simple.

You will not read/hear about the new schools, functioning water system, rebuilding of the electrical grid, the GI made a Shiek, on any news site. It's not blood, gore, death and destruction.

There's no complicated conspiracy as was suggested in the other thread. There's no great cover up by the news media. Nothing so grand. It simply doesn't sell.

And it's not like there haven't been some good things occuring - it's only that mainstream media doesn't report it. And no matter what, virtually no one here cares to believe it, or acknowledge it . . . much easier to continue to bash the War, the President, the Congress, the Senate . . . . there's no news in good news.

And what I'm saying is certainly not new to you my friend . . . we've spoken of this on threads in here in the past.

Here's the thread I'm referencing.
Heated Iraq War Debate In The House Today (by KC135R Nov 19 2005 in Non Aviation)


User currently offlineSFOMEX From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 1903 times:

Quoting Dan-Air (Reply 4):
start pumping the oil and pay us back for removing Saddam.



Quoting Dan-Air (Reply 10):
Quoting Mt99 (Reply 8):
Did they askto have Saddam removed? Just wondering.

Nah, that was a bonus. Now where's our $300,000,000,000? Start pumping.

Sorry pal, but inasmuch as I support president Bush, it seems to me that American taxpayers will have to pay the bill this time. Iraq is a mess, so don't expect to get the money back soon.

What a pity that a good and decent president made such a huge mistake invading Iraq. It's already dooming his presidency.


User currently offlineFalcon84 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (8 years 11 months 1 week 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 1900 times:

Quoting SFOMEX (Reply 23):
Sorry pal, but inasmuch as I support president Bush,

Boy, there's a newsflash.

Quoting SFOMEX (Reply 23):
What a pity that a good and decent president made such a huge mistake invading Iraq.

Nothing good or decent about this guy, nor many in his administration.


25 SFOMEX : Nothing? Are you serious? Don't let your ideology to blind you Falcon. I'd never dare to say that of Clinton, and God knows I don't like him.
26 Falcon84 : I don't give a rip what you think about Bush. You can worship him all you want. I find absolutely nothing redeeming about the man in any way, shape o
27 We're Nuts : What really pisses me off is how those cry-baby senate republicans responded to Murtha's words. It borders on terrorism itself! Forcing the entire sen
28 Cessnapimp : Yup, you're right "We're nuts", he stated it in his speech quoted in the thread starter. A great speech IMO. This guy has his head on straight. Kerry
29 MidnightMike : What a brave man, when it came down to a vote, how did Congressman John Murtha vote? Well, he voted against the bill, which would have called for, wh
30 B777-700 : This isn't an election year. Now you see the real GOP. That's true, and as much as I'm against this war, we broke it, and we need to be the ones to f
31 We're Nuts : The vote was a knee-jerk reaction. It doesn't even qualify as a joke. It's a national disgrace. Do you think the republicans who drafted it really pl
32 MidnightMike : Was it a political stunt when Harry Reid ordered the Senate into a closed session. Yes, it was Was it a political stunt when Rep. Murtha gave a press
33 DL021 : As far as Rep Murtha goes.....he served his time and deserves his say. I think hes wrong, and I believe that to leave now would be a horrible mistake
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Observer: US Dirty Tricks To Win Vote On Iraq War posted Sun Mar 2 2003 13:37:41 by Racko
John Murtha Wants To Be House Leader posted Fri Nov 10 2006 07:49:34 by AndesSMF
US Report About The War In Iraq posted Mon Sep 25 2006 10:03:18 by Sebolino
Great Lyrics To A Song About World War III posted Thu Aug 3 2006 08:34:00 by COIAH756CA
Man Jailed For Plot To Kill Iraq War Hero posted Fri Jan 27 2006 02:20:22 by Jetjack74
Iraq War Veteran To Run For Congress posted Tue Dec 20 2005 03:39:12 by Tbar220
Who Has Committed Troops To Iraq War posted Tue Mar 18 2003 00:33:48 by Ryanb741
A Few Open Questions About Iraq posted Sat Nov 11 2006 02:30:38 by Bushpilot
Listen To Joan Osborne's New Album posted Fri Nov 3 2006 17:38:35 by MaverickM11
Regardless Of How You Feel About The War... posted Fri Nov 3 2006 07:05:50 by BCAInfoSys