Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Is The Republican Party At Odds With Science?  
User currently offlineSATX From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 2840 posts, RR: 6
Posted (10 years 6 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 2408 times:

Describe an American as a Roman Catholic and you say nothing about his or her political and social beliefs.

Left-wing flower-power Democrats can be Catholics, so can right-wing socially conservative Republicans. American Jews, Hindus, even Muslims are not politically defined by their faith. But evangelical Christians, operating inside the Republican party, have coalesced their energies and their resources around a set of beliefs on homosexuality, abortion and Darwinism which place them on the authoritarian right of every political question and at odds with science. They are campaigning, for instance, to tell visitors to the Grand Canyon that this wondrous sight is not millions of years old, which it is.

In the state of Kansas they have succeeded in getting the science syllabus altered so that teachers can tell their pupils that God made everything in its current form - a change the National Academy of Sciences said "would put the students of Kansas at a competitive disadvantage as they took their place in the world." This is serious stuff and Republicans who are not evangelical Christians have in recent weeks been organising a fight-back. They have noticed two things. Number one, that the zealots are spending more energy fighting Charles Darwin than cutting taxes, and number two - and this is much more important - that the zealots outside Kansas are not receiving the support of the nation at large.

In the town of Dover, Pennsylvania, the local school board managed this year to get warmed up, creationism infiltrated into biology classes, and here is what happened. A couple of weeks ago all eight members of the board who were up for re-election lost their seats. "If there is a disaster in your area," the tele-evangelist Pat Robertson told the people of Dover, "don't turn to God - you just rejected Him from your city." Mr Robertson is an important man: the former Attorney General John Ashcroft teaches at his university, and his views are sought on Supreme Court candidates and foreign affairs.

But should those views govern the Republican party? Many members think not, particularly since President Bush is himself in such dire trouble now. He famously told an interviewer that when deciding to go to war in Iraq he listened to the authority not of his dad but of a Higher Father. And, Republicans are daring to think, if not quite say, out loud: "Look where that got him."

From Our Own Correspondent was broadcast on Saturday, 26 November, 2005 at 1130 GMT on BBC Radio 4.


This article really spoke to me. Personally I think the Republican party has somehow become the lap dog of right-wing fundamentalist evangelical nut jobs and I honestly can't believe they've been allowed to take it this far. Maybe the moderate Republicans among us will finally grow some grapes and take their party back from the brink of insanity.

[Edited 2005-11-29 14:38:31]

Open Season on Consumer Protections is Just Around the Corner...
1 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineSATX From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 2840 posts, RR: 6
Reply 1, posted (10 years 6 months 2 days ago) and read 2364 times:

Here is another article with a similar bent...


Fundamentalism is hampering global efforts to tackle climate change, according to Britain's top scientist.

In his final speech as president of the Royal Society, Lord May of Oxford is to warn that core scientific values are "under serious threat from resurgent fundamentalism, West and East".

Scientists must speak out against the climate change "denial lobby", he says.

Lord May completes his five-year term as president of the UK's academy of science on Wednesday.

"Ahead of us lie dangerous times," he will say in his fifth and final anniversary address.

"There are serious problems that derive from the realities of the external world: climate change, loss of biological diversity, new and re-emerging diseases, and more.

"Many of these threats are not yet immediate, yet their non-linear character is such that we need to be acting today.

"And we have no evolutionary experience of acting on behalf of a distant future; we even lack basic understanding of important aspects of our own institutions and societies.

"Sadly, for many, the response is to retreat from complexity and difficulty by embracing the darkness of fundamentalist unreason."

Open Season on Consumer Protections is Just Around the Corner...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
So Where Is The Damaged Party? posted Wed Jul 17 2002 13:01:31 by L-188
The Republican Party posted Wed Nov 8 2000 21:03:05 by Pilot1113
What Is The Deal With The Pool/lake At AMS posted Sun Sep 12 2004 21:04:24 by Dreamer
"Dick Cheney" At The Republican Convention posted Tue Oct 4 2005 08:59:08 by Tbar220
Why Is Everyone So "fascinated" With The US? posted Tue Mar 15 2005 18:17:05 by UAL747
What CD Is In Your Car At The Moment? posted Fri Jan 7 2005 21:44:27 by Alcregular
The White Republican Party posted Thu Nov 11 2004 04:11:44 by SESGDL
What Is The Deal With French Milled Soap? posted Fri Sep 17 2004 15:56:54 by Mirrodie
Why Is The US Fascinated With Royalty? posted Fri Mar 12 2004 17:20:45 by Startvalve
So What Is The Preoccupation With Death Lately? posted Sat Dec 27 2003 10:19:43 by L-188