TWFirst From Vatican City, joined Apr 2000, 6346 posts, RR: 51
Reply 3, posted (13 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 208 times:
There was an article about this in the Wall Street Journal today (13 Sept). It said that physically, there's no reason why the sight can't be rebuilt on, and that developers will be salivating to develop the site. It said that financing and other emotional issues will be the bigger hurdles.
KROC From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (13 years 7 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 164 times:
I think they should rebuild, like many have said, bigger and better. memorial like in Ok City would be nice, but to me, a living, working memorial, like the WTC rebuilt is much better for the rememberance of everyone who lost and gave there lives for this.
Iainhol From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (13 years 7 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 142 times:
^^ I think that is a great idea! Definately it should go back up, just to prove they did not win. I also think as Airlinerlover said, a memorial should be put up somewhere near, maybe even in the towers.