RichardPrice From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 6 months 2 days ago) and read 6620 times:
Its a descriptive story that essentially destroys the mythos surrounding organised religion - specifically the Catholic church. Because of this, people have read far too much into it in some cases and tried to put forward a lot of what its saying as truth.
Personally, having read it, its a good read and very thought provoking (something that some organisations deem bad...). He raises good questions, some of which do pan out when you investigate them in real life, while other things are totally made up.
Venezuela747 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 1442 posts, RR: 4
Reply 3, posted (9 years 6 months 2 days ago) and read 6609 times:
It is a fiction book, I liked it as one because it was very intriguing and it kept me at the edge of my seat and I always wanted to turn the page to find out what happened, like other good books....that's it.
I hate it how some people are completly buying into everything Dan Brown says and wasting money on all this stuff, if you do a little bit of research you find out that a lot of the facts are true but the connections are completly made up ans non-existent.
PROSA From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5644 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (9 years 6 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 6595 times:
It was a collection of unreadable pseudo-intellectual crap. Toss in a collection of trivia, and people think they'll get smart from reading it. Not to mention the practice of ending almost every chapter with an exciting cliffhanger, so people just have to keep reading. That's a common trick in children's literature but condescening in something aimed at adults.
"Let me think about it" = the coward's way of saying "no"
Logan22L From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (9 years 6 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 6553 times:
Quoting PROSA (Reply 4): It was a collection of unreadable pseudo-intellectual crap. Toss in a collection of trivia, and people think they'll get smart from reading it. Not to mention the practice of ending almost every chapter with an exciting cliffhanger, so people just have to keep reading. That's a common trick in children's literature but condescening in something aimed at adults.
Well, PROSA's viewpoint and mine will make a nice microcosm of people's differing opinions. I've read much Dostoevsky, Camus and other serious stuff, and I really enjoyed Da Vinci. I read it as a work of fiction, but I must say he writes in a manner that is quite convincing. That the subject matter is such a sensitive establishment obviously makes many people uncomfortable. I for one, never noticed that in "The Last Supper," the disciple to Jesus Christ's immediate right is obviously female, and no one can really dispute the role women have been relegated to in the Catholic church.
So, it made me think a bit, which is never a bad thing. By all means, make up your own mind - about everything.
GDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13387 posts, RR: 77
Reply 6, posted (9 years 6 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 6553 times:
Not read it, but I note that at least one cathedral in the UK, mentioned in the book, have changed their visitor information to account for myths and plain false information in the book.
After many visitors, usually foreign tourists, kept on asking questions related to this work of fiction, seemingly unable to separate fantasy from reality, arguably the curse of our age.
9VSPO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (9 years 6 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 6543 times:
I just didn't like Dan Browns writing style. He repeats stuff over and over again in the book. It was ok but I wouldn't read anything else by him after reading that. Having said that I will probably go see the movie. Some of the theories about Leonardo Da Vinci were interesting but.....
Jush From Germany, joined Apr 2005, 1638 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (9 years 6 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 6542 times:
Yep but it still remains a great book.
It's like every conspiracy theory. Your are intrigued and actually want to believe it. So you have to remind yourself to not get carried away and don't believe anything.
If you can do this or not it'll be a great read anyway
There is one problem with airbus. Though their products are engineering marvels they lack passion, completely.
Ly7e7 From Israel, joined Jun 2004, 2277 posts, RR: 18
Reply 12, posted (9 years 6 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 6483 times:
It is a fiction book, quite stupid and badly written IMHO.
The main problem for Catholics (and other Christians) with that book is that it basically says that JC was a human being, who ate, drank, loved and f*cked. As such he probably had offsprings, considering the fact that 2000+ years ago contraceptives were not there - all of which was true. As far as I care - I could be in the same bloodline .
Scamp From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 580 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (9 years 6 months 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 6445 times:
As a non-Catholic, I can see where it would cause the Vatican to get its collective panties in a wad, but I enjoyed the book a great deal. Frankly, I don't give a squat whether or not Jesus was married or had a daughter. It doesn't change who or what He is for me.
Kennethsk From Thailand, joined Oct 2005, 297 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (9 years 6 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 6343 times:
Quoting AirxLiban (Reply 16): So now I'm not sure whether it is worth reading or not. If I do read it, I suppose I should be wary of the points brought up here.
How should I approach this book if I decide to go about reading it?
Just read it like any other book you would read. Don't think it's a big book people talk about, but just a book that you would grab fromt he bookstores and read. If you don't like it, don't continue, if you do then you know what you enjoy.
'Cuz then you won't know how it is like if you don't try yourself!
Welcome to the REAL world! it SUCKS but you are gonna LOVE it!
Banco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 24, posted (9 years 6 months 7 hours ago) and read 6172 times:
It's an entertaining read, but it's a load of nonsense in its claims to represent accuracy.
There are bits and pieces that are reasonable enough. Various of the Coptic Gospels present intriguing alternate stories, and it is true that the Church edited and discarded various of the gospels in the early years. Equally, the painting of the Last Supper has long been thought controversial - to me it looks like a female and always has, others disagree.
But so much of it is claimed to be truth and simply isn't. The secret society Brown states really does exist in his foreword - and is the crux of the whole plot - almost certainly doesn't (and anyway, he got the idea from Holy Blood, Holy Grail and is currently subject of a legal action), the various architectural links he puts forward are pure fantasy, and the whole Mary Magdelene thing, whilst possible, has no evidence whatsoever.
Treat it as fiction, and you're fine. The problem is that people believe it.
She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
: It's fiction - not real. On the whole an enjoyable read, weaving a fictional story around some historical truths. Quite clever really. The fact that t
: It is an excellent thriller, and intelligently written (because it seems incredibly fantastic, while remaining plausible). It is fiction, including ma
: It was a horribly readable book - which is why publishers love it - the equivalent of a popcorn movie, great for light entertainment but not something
: Just like the Left Behind series, The Da Vinci Code takes stories from the Bible and extends them into myths about what might have been and what may c
: Hm...thanks for the all the responses. Still not sure whether or not to bother reading it, especially since I've got a lot of other things to get thro
: hey, we all love a conspiracy. Thats the bottom line. Those what don't will rip the book apart. Those who do love conspiracy love it. Personally, the
: It is not a bad book. Not his best though. I liked "Angels and Demons" and "Deception Point" better. None of it is fine literature, but it is a good w