Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Chevy Impala Or Buick Century?  
User currently offlineRNOcommctr From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 827 posts, RR: 3
Posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 7993 times:

I am looking to buy about a 2003 Chevy Impala or 2003 Buick Century (or Regal). Both of these cars are rated as reliable by Consumer Reports. They appeal to me because of the medium size and comfort. I also like the fact that only GM cars in this size and price range have dual-zone climate control, a feature I need to preserve my marriage.

Anyone own one of these vehicles? What are your impressions?

I hate the blandness of the Century interior; the Impala's interior is a little more visually appealing. Neither car's exterior sets the world of styling on fire, in my opinion.

Any thoughts are much appreciated.


I'm sorry, ma'am, I don't work for the airline.
81 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineFriendlySkies From United States of America, joined Aug 2004, 4105 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 7988 times:

Well, I think they're both crap because GM makes them (go get a Toyota or something). But if you're dead-set on one of those, the Regal is pretty nice. My dad rented one once (believe it was a 2003 even), and it was much roomier than the Impala's I've been in.

User currently offlineJmc1975 From Israel, joined Sep 2000, 3253 posts, RR: 15
Reply 2, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 7979 times:

I have rented both cars. And in my opinion the Chevy Impala is much better than the Century. They are both probably equal in ride and comfort, but I found the Impala to have more nimble handling. I once had to do a sudden lane change at 75mph in the Century and it gave me flashbacks to my first car, a '77 Ford Granada. The Impala also has a larger and torquier engine than the Century (3.4-liter 180-hp vs. 3.1-liter 175-hp).

With that said, over both of them by far, I would recommend a 2003 (2004 has 5-spd auto trans) Toyota Camry 4-cyl, which has superior gas mileage and reliability, has similar comfort and acceleration, however, you might have to shop around for the dual climate control.



.......
User currently offlineDL021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11446 posts, RR: 76
Reply 3, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 7967 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

RNO...buddy, you need to drive both cars and decide if the little extras you'll get in the Buick makes it worth the extra money you'll pay.

The Impala is a vary nice car, especially for the money, and you'll get your dollars worth. I don't know if it has dual climate control, but if it does I'd go for that one.



Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
User currently offlineAsstChiefMark From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 7961 times:

I've driven both. The Impala seems to be more sturdy.

It must have inherited some toughness from its police car brother.

Mark


User currently offlineNWA742 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 7954 times:

Century

-Based off the Chevy Malibu, Oldsmobile Alero, and Pontiac Grand Am platform
-Slightly smaller
-Interior is more luxorious and has a few goodies
-Suspension is very soft, the car sways a lot
-Has the less powerful 3.1L V6

Impala

-Has it's own platform (I think)
-Slightly larger
-More stiffer and stury suspension system
-More powerful 3.4L V6




Either way, you can't go wrong. As said before, they are very good cars for the money -- reliable, great gas mileage, and excellent value (not for sellers). Personally I opted for the Pontiac Grand Am because it's sporty design and it has the more powerful 3.4L V6.



Also, ignore the idiot GM-bashers. For money's sake -- I'd much rather have a newer V6 GM sedan than I would a 4 banger foreign car with double the miles.



-NWA742


User currently offlineFlight152 From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 3388 posts, RR: 6
Reply 6, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 7942 times:

No offense or anything, but they are both garbage. Especially the geriatric Buick, talk about outdated. Take a look at the Honda accord for an excellent comparable car.

[Edited 2005-12-11 01:37:01]

User currently offlineNWA742 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 7938 times:

Quoting Flight152 (Reply 6):
No offense or anything, but they are both garbage.

Not surprising at all.

Quoting Flight152 (Reply 6):
Take a look at the Honda accord for an excellent comparable car.

Accords are a higher class of car, they cost a lot more. Seems like the author might not have the budget. Moot suggestion.




-NWA742


User currently offlineKevinl1011 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 2964 posts, RR: 48
Reply 8, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 7930 times:

Quoting NWA742 (Reply 5):
Either way, you can't go wrong. As said before, they are very good cars for the money -- reliable, great gas mileage, and excellent value (not for sellers). Personally I opted for the Pontiac Grand Am because it's sporty design and it has the more powerful 3.4L V6.

Once again....NWA742 speaks truth.
Even better is if you can get a 3.8L V6. It's bullet proof, plenty of power and easy to maintain.
Advise....The 3.1L and 3.4L have an inherent coolant / oil leak problem at the lower intake manifold gasket. Most will leak @ 60 - 100K miles. The replacement gasket set cures the problem, but it's a $400.00 repair.



474218, Carl, You will be missed.
User currently offlineNWA742 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 7929 times:

Quoting Kevinl1011 (Reply 8):
Even better is if you can get a 3.8L V6. It's bullet proof, plenty of power and easy to maintain.

  

Sometimes you can get lucky and find a base Impala that has a 3.8 in it instead of the 3.4. Although 99% of the time, the 3.8s were left for the Impala LS and SS models. The newer Impalas use the newer 3.5s and 3.9s.

Edit - I believe the 3.5 is based off the 3100/3400 block and the 3.9 is based off the 3.8 block -- not sure though.

Quoting Kevinl1011 (Reply 8):
The 3.1L and 3.4L have an inherent coolant / oil leak problem at the lower intake manifold gasket. Most will leak @ 60 - 100K miles. The replacement gasket set cures the problem, but it's a $400.00 repair.

This is true, I'd go ahead and save the extra money for that. However, I've heard rumors that GM solved this problem in 2003-present models. Haven't confirmed it though.




-NWA742

[Edited 2005-12-11 01:54:11]

User currently offlineFlight152 From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 3388 posts, RR: 6
Reply 10, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 7912 times:

Accords are a higher class of car, they cost a lot more

Someone hasn't done their research. Lets take a look at the numbers.

2003 Buick Century Limited (new car price)
$23,285
V6 with 175 hp
4 speed auto

2003 Honda Accord V6 (with 05 pricing, couldn't find 03 {higher if anything})
$24,500
V6 witth 240 hp
5 speed auto (or manual)

An additional $1200 hardly puts it in another class. It should be well made up for by its much higher hp and better looks.


User currently offlineTPAnx From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 1021 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 7911 times:

Bought a 2003 Buick LaSabre Limited with 7K miles on it this spring--for about 12K$ off the sticker. Love it..comfortable, peppy, responsive (3.7L) dual climate control, a great sound system, roomy trunk. All the bells and whistles..except for a sunroof. Overall quality is great..and its a lot more comfortable than some BMW and Mercedes I've been in. 31MPG at 75 mph down I-75 from Gainesville to Tampa...
 thumbsup 
TPAnx



I read the news today..oh boy
User currently offlineAirCop From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 7902 times:

2003 Impala vs. Century
My choice is the Impala. Penalty of room inside, dependable engine, a girl that works with me has 100,000 on hers, high mileage on the highway, meanwhile the
Buick Century in my part of the world means winter visitor from someplace in the north otherwise its for older people.


User currently offlinePROSA From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 5632 posts, RR: 5
Reply 13, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 7894 times:

Quoting Flight152 (Reply 10):
An additional $1200 hardly puts it [the Accord] in another class. It should be well made up for by its much higher hp and better looks.

Other things being equal, a 2003 Accord is likely to be $2,500 to $3,000 more than a 2003 Impala. Hondas tend to hold their values better than GM cars.



"Let me think about it" = the coward's way of saying "no"
User currently offlineFlight152 From United States of America, joined Nov 2000, 3388 posts, RR: 6
Reply 14, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 7888 times:

Other things being equal, a 2003 Accord is likely to be $2,500 to $3,000 more than a 2003 Impala. Hondas tend to hold their values better than GM cars.

Yes, and when it comes time to sell it, it will also return more due to the higher residual value.


User currently offlineKevinl1011 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 2964 posts, RR: 48
Reply 15, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 7886 times:

Quoting PROSA (Reply 13):
Other things being equal, a 2003 Accord is likely to be $2,500 to $3,000 more than a 2003 Impala. Hondas tend to hold their values better than GM cars.

I kind of like having a good 'ol dependable pushrod engine with timing chain instead of a rubber band "timing belt".

Also consider insurance cost. The Accord has a high loss rate due to theft and a higher cost of repair.



474218, Carl, You will be missed.
User currently offlineNWA742 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 7882 times:

Quoting Flight152 (Reply 10):
Someone hasn't done their research. Lets take a look at the numbers.

2003 Buick Century Limited (new car price)
$23,285
V6 with 175 hp
4 speed auto

2003 Honda Accord V6 (with 05 pricing, couldn't find 03 {higher if anything})
$24,500
V6 witth 240 hp
5 speed auto (or manual)

You couldn't find pricing for 2003 Accords?

  

And I haven't done my research?

First of all, before we look at the real numbers, I didn't have to research - I already know that foreign sedans hold their value much better than GM and Ford sedans - it's common automotive knowledge.



Now, for the numbers, he's looking at used car prices, not new.. So if we look at 2003:


Used 2003 V6 Buick Centurys

-Average 8.5-12K depending on the mileage and condition. Look at Ebay, look at KBB, look at Autotrader, it's all there. KBB value with 30000 miles, V6, and standard equipment is 11.6K

---

Used 2003 V6 Honda Accord Sedans

-Average 17-23K depending on the mileage and condition. KBB value with 30000 miles, V6, and standard eqipment miles is right around 19.0K. Again, look at Ebay, look at KBB, look at Autotrader.

Edit: The above numbers are retail values.



Why the hell am I argueing with you about this? Used Accords with comparative equipment, mileage, and condition, will cost at least $5000 more than an Impala or Century. You want to deny it, go ahead. You want to skip the issue by posting new car prices that have nothing to do with this discussion, go ahead. I know that I am right.




-NWA742

[Edited 2005-12-11 03:08:56]

User currently offlineACDC8 From Canada, joined Mar 2005, 7642 posts, RR: 36
Reply 17, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 7863 times:

Having put many miles on both these cars in the last year, I'd have to say the Impala may be a better buy (however, I'm not a fan of them and I wouldn't spend a dime on a GM, but that's just my opinion and I'll keep that to myself  Wink ).

The Impala is a bit "sportier  footinmouth  " then the Century and does have a bit more pep to it. Both interiors are quite bland but room is comparable. I don't know exactly how much your budget is, but you may want to take a peek at the Buick Allure and Chevy Malibu. The Allure (or Lacrosse in the US) has replaced the Century and Regal and is a vast improvement over both of them. The Malibu is a bit smaller but is a very impressive car, great powerplant, fantastic handling, great interior and better mileage.

My father has owned a Buick Regal, LeSabre and a new Century. He's regretting the purchase of the Buick as it has some serious quality issues and the build is very poor. That combined with a lack of power and higher gas mileage then his other 2 Buicks.



A Grumpy German Is A Sauerkraut
User currently offlineSkySurfer From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 1136 posts, RR: 12
Reply 18, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 7855 times:

Why not go for a used Audi A4 (doubt there's any A6's knocking around).....great all rounder, reliable engine and body, nice shape and its not too high in the price range.

Cheers



In the dark you can't see ugly, but you can feel fat
User currently offlineNWA742 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 7845 times:

Just to further prove it, Flight152, I just got back from Ebay.

Look at 2003 Centuries - the first one you see has 22K miles, going for a Buy It Now at $8999

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2003-...sPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

Look at 2003 Accords - first V6 one that you see is a V6 coupe, 46K miles, going for a Buy it Now at $18,950.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/One-O...QcategoryZ6254QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem



I could find a 100 more examples of these pricing differences on Autotrader, but I don't need to. Fact is fact.



-NWA742


User currently offlineJmc1975 From Israel, joined Sep 2000, 3253 posts, RR: 15
Reply 20, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 7835 times:

Quoting SkySurfer (Reply 18):
Why not go for a used Audi A4 (doubt there's any A6's knocking around).....great all rounder, reliable engine and body, nice shape and its not too high in the price range.

Audis here in the US are considered near luxury. The A4 is quite a bit smaller than the Impala/Century/Camry but more expensive. Although the reliability of an A4 would be similar to the GM models, the cost of parts would be substantially more, and more difficult to find. Buying an Audi in the US is great if you want to present an image, but if you're looking for value, it's not there.



.......
User currently offlineACDC8 From Canada, joined Mar 2005, 7642 posts, RR: 36
Reply 21, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 7832 times:

Quoting NWA742 (Reply 19):
Look at 2003 Centuries - the first one you see has 22K miles, going for a Buy It Now at $8999



Quoting NWA742 (Reply 19):
Look at 2003 Accords - first V6 one that you see is a V6 coupe, 46K miles, going for a Buy it Now at $18,950.

All, I can say is that you get what you pay for ....  duck   Wink



A Grumpy German Is A Sauerkraut
User currently offlineNWA742 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 22, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 7825 times:

Quoting ACDC8 (Reply 21):
All, I can say is that you get what you pay for ....

Well, the Hondas are a higher form of vehicle, there's no argueing about that. They hold their value better, they have higher quality materials, etc.

But remember, value is value, and in this case (buying a used car), there's no doubt in my mind that midsize GM and Ford sedans will give you the best bang for you buck. Why would I spend 20K on a 50000 mile Accord when I can spend half that on a much newer Ford, Chevy, Buick, etc, with comparative features?

All about what you want, I guess.



-NWA742


User currently offlineACDC8 From Canada, joined Mar 2005, 7642 posts, RR: 36
Reply 23, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 7815 times:

Quoting NWA742 (Reply 22):
All about what you want, I guess.

Exactly. One needs to set their budget and ask themselves what they are looking for. Personally, I would rather spend the the $19K on the 2003 Accord as opposed to the 2003 Century that only has half the miles and at half the cost. But that's just me.

Quoting Jmc1975 (Reply 20):
Audis here in the US are considered near luxury

True.

Quoting Jmc1975 (Reply 20):
A4 is quite a bit smaller than the Impala/Century/Camry but more expensive

True.

Quoting Jmc1975 (Reply 20):
Although the reliability of an A4 would be similar to the GM models

Not true.

Quoting Jmc1975 (Reply 20):
the cost of parts would be substantially more, and more difficult to find.

True.

Quoting Jmc1975 (Reply 20):
Buying an Audi in the US is great if you want to present an image, but if you're looking for value, it's not there.

That depends on what you define value as. Yes, an new A4 will cost you at least $10,000 to $15,000 more then a comparable GM or Ford. But, your resale value will be much higher in the end, and you'll actually loose less money as the Audi's do not depreciate as much as a GM or Ford. Take both for a test drive, pay very close attention to the choice, quality and build of the materials used in both cars (inside and out). There is a world of difference. GM, sadly, builds cheap cars. Their reliability is horrendous (I know this because I deal with many car manufacturers every day I go to work, and our fleet of GM's spend more days in the shop then they do on the road). The material quality is very low as is the general build quality which are two of the main reasons why GM's are quite affordable.

Having said that, if getting the most features for as little money as possible, not worrying about resale value or reliability and if that is your definition of value, then GM is your ticket. However, value for me is how much quality and how much reliability I get out of the vehicle, and that usually cost a little more.

[Edited 2005-12-11 04:09:31]


A Grumpy German Is A Sauerkraut
User currently offlineNWA742 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (8 years 7 months 2 weeks 6 days 16 hours ago) and read 7810 times:

Quoting ACDC8 (Reply 23):
GM, sadly, builds cheap cars. Their reliability is horrendous

First of all, that's a very simple opinion for such a wide range of vehicles. You actually think Yukons and Corvettes are cheap, unreliable, crappy-built vehicles?

This subject of reliability is debatable at best -- for instance, I think most GMs are very reliable, especially the trucks and SUVs. So far, my GM car has been completely reliable, not a single problem yet.




-NWA742


25 ACDC8 : I drive and work with several types of GM vehicles ranging from the Aveo to the Cadillac STS, the Uplander to the Yukons. I never said anything about
26 NWA742 : And? They are completely different classes, versions, types of vehicles, and your opinion remains the same on every single one? Whatever man. Other p
27 PROSA : Years ago there used to be a belief that cars built on Mondays or Fridays were especially prone to be lemons. The idea was that on Mondays, many auto
28 SCCutler : Ignorance is a sad thing to see displayed. Notwithstanding urban myth, actual (and well-publicized) data show that GM has some of the highest-quality
29 Post contains links and images LOT767-300ER : 1. One of my GM's appreciates in value from year to year. 2. That GM's can outrun your BMW. 3. That GM was made in the 1990s Son you cant even spell P
30 NWA742 : Haha, I was wondering where you were, partner. I'm probably out for the night -- I'll leave it to you to teach the GM haters until I'm back. You prob
31 ACDC8 : You said .... My response was that I deal with a very wide range of GM vehicles (among other badges) on a daily basis, so I was just answering your p
32 Post contains images ACDC8 : Did you just call me son? Whatever kiddo! I was halfway in the shower, forgive me of my spelling sin .... Is the Corvette not GM's or even America's
33 ETStar : I just wanted to say that I am very sorry to hear that.
34 PROSA : Porsche is regarded as a prestigious luxury/performance brand in the United States. Yes, the cars are of the highest quality, but even if quality wer
35 RNOcommctr : Wow, I thought this was one of the blandest thread-starters of all time... was I ever wrong! I guess you can never under-estimate emotions and opinion
36 Post contains links and images NWA742 : I wasn't. Uh, Porsches don't sell that well in the US. It's pretty rare to see them in most places actually. So people who spend $60K on a Corvette d
37 Post contains images LOT767-300ER : I wouldnt say that with the errr...population that we have here. Thats a ridiculous statement...the Porsche and the Corvette are NOT made for the sam
38 Post contains images AC777LR : I am more partial to Chrysler out of the American Big three, but that being said we do own a Hummer H2 with the 6.0L Vortech engine. It takes a beatin
39 Jmc1975 : So what are you saying? According to Consumer Reports, the Audi A4 has average to below average reliablility, like the Century/Regal/Impala. The Acco
40 Post contains links and images Emirates773ER : I would have to say that I tend to agree with ACDC on this issues. Abou buying a Impala or Buick, I would rather buy these: http://cgi.ebay.ca/Nissan-
41 Post contains images ACDC8 : Ok, where did we leave off? " target=_blank>http://www.autoweek.com/news.cms?new...02690 The "Blue Devil" is not a standard Z06 and may or may not be
42 NWA742 : During testing, it was a prototype - now it is standard, and available. Besides the fact, the point still stands -- you're completely wrong about its
43 NWA742 : Nav systems are currently offered on many US models from GM, Ford, and Dodge. -NWA742
44 AC777LR : The Nav on the Dodge is the best one though, They offer a 6disc MP3 Changer with DVD nav, GM only offers a Single CD with DVD nav (indash) ford I thin
45 Aerobalance : Buy the Impala. BTW, having watched my parents suffer with GM vehicles over the last 20 years I finally got the call from my mother who asked me to h
46 ACDC8 : OK, I'm back.... I agree with you 100%. Cars are made for different purposes and different markets. And from my experiences, the European market is mu
47 Post contains links Flight152 : Porsche 911s (Non-turbo) retail right around 100K. Sorry man, a base 911 Carrera has a price of $71,300 http://www.porsche.com/usa/models/911/911-carr
48 NWA742 : Neither have I, but according to GM boards and sources, it is officially "out," whatever that means. I hope so -- and it will be produced and sold to
49 RNOcommctr : Back to one of my original points: the vehicle MUST have dual-zone climate control. I like to be at about 65 degrees, my wife at about 77 degrees. I a
50 Post contains images A332 : The Impala is an ideal choice... You might want to have a look at the Grand Prix as well... 2003 was the last year of the more rounded body style and
51 Stirling : You should get one of those new Lamborghatti Fasterosas..... What's good enough for Mr Burns is good enough for me.
52 Post contains images ACDC8 : Just time for a quick post : I really hope so as well. And I am also really hoping that Chevy comes out with a Camaro next year that can give my Musta
53 Post contains images NWA742 : Well there's something that we agree 100% on, finally! There have been limitless rumors about the next Camaros. One disinct clue, is that a few month
54 Post contains images LOT767-300ER : Honestly, its COMPARISON with one 'r' English is not even my first language and I write it better than you..I suggest you take 2 cars around same pri
55 Gatorman96 : If you are set on an Impala or Regal, go for the Impala. But, depending on how important duel climate zones are, I would also look at the Accord or To
56 AC777LR : What about the Dodge Charger SRT or RT? They have everything you are looking for.
57 PHLBOS : Actually, the Century/Regal essentially share the same platform as the Pontiac Grand Prix and the now-gone Oldsmobile Intrique. The Impala's predesso
58 Post contains links StuckinMAF : I have a 2001 Impala with a 3.4 and it has 137,000 hard-driving, poorly maintained West Texas miles on it and here are the only problems I've had with
59 Post contains images ACDC8 : Are we still going on with this? I'm starting to have dreams about this thread... I find the leg room OK in the Grand Am, but I do feel somewhat crowd
60 StuckinMAF : Barf! (Can I say that in this forum? Oh well.) They really screwed up what was one of the only "somewhat" unique designs! The new one totally throws
61 Post contains images NWA742 : Sorry for the late response, I've been busy. But, we are still going on about it. If you're having dreams over it, please seek some counseling. The d
62 Post contains images LOT767-300ER : It IS when he is considering an Impala/Regal because of the PRICE. 3k more and you could have a different class car. Head lights that turn when move
63 Post contains images NWA742 : I think he said he drives a Mustang GT. Nonetheless, ACDC8, LOT's Impala SS would probably dust your Mustang GT without breaking a sweat. GTs are qui
64 Post contains images LOT767-300ER : He drives an import in his imagination! where I also own him. Mustang GT? A SVT Cobra makes me laugh, and a 2005 BMW M3 gets to see how shiny flowmas
65 AC777LR : Oh I almost had a Hummer H2 Lingenfelter in my driveway, How I would dream to own that one. I am a big fan of the new Chrysler platform, all RWD or AW
66 Post contains images ACDC8 : Same here. I have, but my therapist said I was beyond help ... . He told me to sign up on A.net as treatment, but it hasn't helped. It is unique, but
67 LOT767-300ER : To tell you the truth I never researched that or do not know. Err.......thats wrong. I put ketchup on everything..people are like..WTF you doing roas
68 Post contains images Aviation : Allways the CHEV! Cheers,
69 Post contains images ACDC8 : Ketchup?!?!?! Icky. Only goes good on burgers and hot dogs. I saw an older Corsa once with two V6's stuck in it. One in the front and one in the back
70 Post contains links LOT767-300ER : Tell that to someone that lived in CENTRAL Chicago...that you want ketchup on a hot dog. http://www.lookatentertainment.com/v/v-131.htm So are Polish
71 StuckinMAF : Read the owner's manual. You can easily change the settings on both of these features and turn them off, too. I increase the time setting on the ligh
72 Post contains images PHLBOS : IIRC, when the '94-'96 Impala SS rolled out; it NEVER stickered higher than $25-26k fully loaded... at least in the States and barring any foolish de
73 PROSA : They were discontinued after the 2005 model year. IIRC, the factory in BWI that produced them has been closed.
74 Post contains images LOT767-300ER : Read my post. Its at the bottom of Reply #62 mate Its a SS Lingenfelter. The Lingenfelter outfit was $10,500 USD.
75 LOT767-300ER : Just to add to that. Lingenfelter did custom jobs on the 1994-1996 models where you could pick what you wanted redone and re-fit...I dont know if they
76 PHLBOS : That would explain the price differential. While I knew that aftermarket upgrades did exist; I wasn't aware of the exact names of them and what the p
77 Superfly : RNOcommctr: Tough call. Even though Buick is a more elite brand than Chevrolet, the Century is the smallest entry level Buick while the Impala is the
78 Post contains images LOT767-300ER : Correct, Lingenfelter does outfits for alot of American cars if you want it done. Everything from The Impala SS to the Lingenfelter Corvette to a Lin
79 Post contains images Superfly : I had a 1987 Chrysler LeBaron convertible. Same car as the 1992 model but different interior and an availible 3.0 V6 engine which was much better tha
80 LOT767-300ER : My mom had a 1992 LeBaron, I remember it with love. Our second car in America after a 1991 Oldsmobile Cutlass Cierra. Which was not bad considering th
81 PHLBOS : Up until the mid-80s, most of your 'plain jane' full-sizes offered the fixed front bench seat as standard equipment. Both my '69 & '76 LTD 4-doors I
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Ford, Dodge Or Chevy? posted Tue Jul 20 2004 23:32:06 by Douglas DC-9
Liked Or Respected Person Of 20th Century? posted Sun Jan 14 2001 01:29:41 by Matt D
Is "Stupid Indian" Racist Or Not? posted Sat Nov 18 2006 06:01:30 by Don
Who Used Viagra Or Cialis Without Needed It? posted Tue Nov 14 2006 00:45:34 by Bongo
Spamalot Or The Producers? posted Tue Nov 14 2006 00:29:53 by SW733
Peace Or Justice In Uganda: Choose One posted Mon Nov 13 2006 20:53:11 by MaverickM11
HD Video Cam Or Nikon D-80? posted Sat Nov 11 2006 15:36:28 by TedTAce
Honda Civic Or CR-V? posted Sat Nov 11 2006 02:39:33 by FRAspotter
AIM Or MSN posted Thu Nov 9 2006 22:36:51 by Walter747
Dem Or Rep, We Should Still Be Scared. posted Wed Nov 8 2006 01:12:32 by 767Lover