Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Is This The End Of Tony Blair  
User currently offlineCosec59 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 9 months 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 2221 times:

Following his humiliating defeat in the detention of suspected terrorists saga, he is now about to surrender the UK's rebate from the EU.
Will he survive as Prime Minister?

23 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offline9VSPO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (8 years 9 months 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 2215 times:

Quoting Cosec59 (Thread starter):
Will he survive as Prime Minister?

He's got more chance than Charles Kennedy! Big grin


User currently offlineCosec59 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 9 months 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 2211 times:

Quoting 9VSPO (Reply 1):
He's got more chance than Charles Kennedy

Charlie boy ain't the Prime Minister


User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 3, posted (8 years 9 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2190 times:

Er. Yes. Of course he'll survive.

Blair will have for more difficulty over the education reforms in January. Howls of protest from the opposition is par for the course. It's when his own party start to have a go he's got problems.



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently onlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 39879 posts, RR: 74
Reply 4, posted (8 years 9 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 2183 times:

Any chance of Britan electing a REAL Labor Party leader instead a lapdog of the Bush administration?


Bring back the Concorde
User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 5, posted (8 years 9 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2158 times:

Quoting Superfly (Reply 4):
Any chance of Britan electing a REAL Labor Party leader instead a lapdog of the Bush administration?

We don't have a Labor Party. It's a proper noun, it can't be spelled your way. Like Pearl Harbour.  Wink



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently onlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 39879 posts, RR: 74
Reply 6, posted (8 years 9 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2156 times:

Ok Banco:
Any chance of Britan electing a REAL Labour Party leader instead a lapdog of the Bush administration?



Bring back the Concorde
User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 7, posted (8 years 9 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2150 times:

Quoting Superfly (Reply 6):
Any chance of Britan electing a REAL Labour Party leader instead a lapdog of the Bush administration?

It's "Britain".












 Wink

Sorry, but I couldn't resist. Big grin

OK, OK, OK.

I did go through with you before the reasons why, whatever you may think of him, Blair is far from being a lapdog of the US. I explained that he believes possibly more than Bush in many ways. You accepted that at the time, why have you gone back on that?  Confused



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently onlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 39879 posts, RR: 74
Reply 8, posted (8 years 9 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2146 times:

Banco:
That's right, I forgot our agreement.  Smile



Bring back the Concorde
User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13206 posts, RR: 77
Reply 9, posted (8 years 9 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2102 times:

Blair, despite the predictable paranoid howls from the tabloids, might just be playing a smart game in Europe.

The UK, unlike France, pushed hard for last years EU enlargement Eastwards.

One reason was to dilute the Franco/German lock on the EU, now Germany, despite what Chirac might say, under Merkel, is less inclined to always support France.

By cultivating the newer East European states, Blair is making friends and influencing people.

If France vetoes the result of the hard won review of EU spending, i.e. much less to the bloated, feather-bedded French farming lobby, it will be their turn to be out on a limb, they won't like that.
Unless France is under different leadership by then, perhaps with the balls to finally stand up to internal vested interests.

Superfly, if you think Gordon Brown will be significantly different to Blair, you'll be disappointed.
He'll have a similar view on balancing the relationship with the US, and the EU, more inclined in foreign affairs/strategic matters, to lean to the US, but in trade, environment etc 3rd World Aid, firmly in the EU camp.
Brown is more Eurosceptic than Blair.

It's true they both would have preferred Al Gore, worked well with Clinton, but they, unlike some EU politicians, live in the real world, Bush is a fact of life, so try to moderate his excesses, don't screw up a long term relationship because a dud got into the WhiteHouse, but for at most, 8 years.

Traditional Labour leader, Harold Wilson, much preferred Nixon, to LBJ, despite LBJ being the closet US President to a UK Labour PM, in policy terms, personal chemistry IS important.

Actually, all Labour PM's have been Atlanticist in defence/strategic affairs, Attlee sent 1000's of British troops to Korea, secured Greece from a communist takeover, when a wartime pledge to share atomic secrets in return for the UK science contribution to the Manhattan Project, Attlee authorized a UK bomb.

The ones that were not, Foot and Kinnock, never came close to winning an election.

To put Blair in the US context, he's for very strict gun control, Socialised medicine, would never deny Global Warming.

Wilson DID resist, to LBJ's fury, sending UK troops to Vietnam, we were busy successfully and in a fairly low key way, wrapping up Communist insurgents in the mid and Far East, as the UK finally withdrew from what remained of Empire, (one of FDR's wartime aims, hence his desire to bankrupt us).
So the US then asks for help in a region they helped to make economically impossible to stay in?
Screw that, also don't rule out payback for Suez 10 years earlier. Even if Wilson had opposed that folly.

But through all this, Wilson supported the US diplomatically in Vietnam, even if his Defence Chiefs thought the way it was being conducted was crazy.
(Defence Secretary Healey told McNamara, a personal friend, as much).


User currently offlineSkySurfer From United Kingdom, joined Sep 2004, 1136 posts, RR: 12
Reply 10, posted (8 years 9 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2095 times:

I don't know if it's the end of Blair, but i must say that i think he's done a great job of running the UK. I was all against him when he was vying to become the PM, but he's proved he has the balls and courage to stand up for the UK. He's made some dubious decisions, but at the end of the day you can't please everyone. I just hope the next PM is as good and as wise IF and WHEN Blair is no longer in # 10.

Cheers



In the dark you can't see ugly, but you can feel fat
User currently offlineFDXMECH From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3251 posts, RR: 34
Reply 11, posted (8 years 9 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 2072 times:

Quoting Superfly (Reply 4):
Any chance of Britan electing a REAL Labor Party leader instead a lapdog of the Bush administration?

What Superfly meant to ask was if Britain has any "blue states?"



You're only as good as your last departure.
User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 12, posted (8 years 9 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 2063 times:

Quoting GDB (Reply 9):
Wilson DID resist, to LBJ's fury, sending UK troops to Vietnam

"You've lost your mind" was what Wilson fairly bluntly told him.

Quoting GDB (Reply 9):
Brown is more Eurosceptic than Blair.

Is he though? It suits Brown to appear that way, to differentiate himself from Blair. But the jury's well and truly out on that.

Quoting FDXMECH (Reply 11):
What Superfly meant to ask was if Britain has any "blue states?"

Well now, it works the other way around here. Labour is red, the Tories are blue.

But the make up of the last election was interesting. The Tories actually won in England, but Scotland and Wales are very much Labour heartlands.



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently offlineRichardPrice From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (8 years 9 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 2057 times:

The rebate did its job and we should now give it up in the process of bargaining, it serves little purpose for having one of hte richest nations in the EU getting a rerbate while the poorest would benefit from the money more. And I dont even like Blair.

User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 14, posted (8 years 9 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 2048 times:

Quoting RichardPrice (Reply 13):
and we should now give it up in the process of bargaining

Er, yes. But we are supposed to get something in return when "bargaining" are we not?



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently offlineWhiteHatter From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (8 years 9 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 2041 times:

Quoting RichardPrice (Reply 13):
The rebate did its job and we should now give it up in the process of bargaining, it serves little purpose for having one of hte richest nations in the EU getting a rerbate while the poorest would benefit from the money more. And I dont even like Blair.

The rebate is linked to economics.

EU contributions are linked to the VAT take, and because of our service economy and large population we would pay a lot more than we do per capita than anyone else. France and other similar nations don't have the same imbalance because of their large farming sectors.

The subsidies in France are actually strange. Chirac fights for them because they are actually France's own money. They are still a large net contributor, meaning that France pays in way more than they take out. Remove those subsidies and France would still need to make the same contributions as foodstuffs are generally low or zero tax rated, and any change in the industry would not lead to a change in the French contribution.

We are much less a farming nation and more of a service and industry nation. That's why our contribution is so high, and we get the rebate to balance it somewhat. What Blair is now saying is that there are new costs as Europe takes in the eastern nations, so everyone needs to chip in a bit more. The French don't want to play with their subsidies, but Britain recognises that we need to throw a few quid in by cutting back SOME of the rebate.

To go back to France, the problem there is that the farming subsidies are skewed and produce a combination of rich megafarmers and produce surpluses. That's where reform is needed. The issue is more structural than bottom line, and it's at the French bottom line that everyone is looking. Chirac is also on the right of French politics and farmers are his natural constituency.

That's why Blair wants reform of agricultural subsidies. He hasn't ever used the word abolition. It is much more complicated than just chopping them back.


User currently offlineScbriml From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2003, 12566 posts, RR: 46
Reply 16, posted (8 years 9 months 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 2032 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Banco (Reply 14):
Er, yes. But we are supposed to get something in return when "bargaining" are we not?

You mean like the French giving up their hugely inflated farming subsidies?  banghead 



Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana!
User currently offlineRobertNL070 From Netherlands, joined Sep 2003, 4532 posts, RR: 9
Reply 17, posted (8 years 9 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2026 times:

Quoting Scbriml (Reply 16):
You mean like the French giving up their hugely inflated farming subsidies?

Which they might do in 2008 or 2009. Then again they might not. Unless I've missed something, it does not look as if Blair got any assurances from the French.

Regards, Robert  bouncy 



Youth is a gift of nature. Age is a work of art.
User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 18, posted (8 years 9 months 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2016 times:

Quoting RobertNL070 (Reply 17):
Unless I've missed something, it does not look as if Blair got any assurances from the French.

Correct. And that's the infuriating thing. Blair was actually in a very strong negotiating position. He could have simply told the rest of them that he wanted agricultural reform or they could get stuffed. Nothing anyone could have done about that either. He could have said that Britain is willing to give up the entire rebate, but only for X, Y and Z in return.

He gave it away for absolutely nothing in return.



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13206 posts, RR: 77
Reply 19, posted (8 years 9 months 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1991 times:

Blair knows that Chirac is coming to the end of his career, (like Blair ironically).
Blair did not want to be out on a limb, if France rejects the outcome of the review, it will be their turn to be in that position, (what 'Solidarity' then?)

This year has seen the new constitution rejected, by France of all nations.
Not really significant, except psychologically, was London beating Paris for 2012.

It's a different EU now, Blair simply could not afford to piss off the new EU Eastern members, they will have an important part to play in the years ahead, before they fully joined, Chirac told them to 'Shut Up'.
He's already pissed them off, but with improved economies and infrastructure, they'll have more muscle in the EU.

The balance of power is shifting somewhat, hopefully Chirac's replacement will realize this, adjust accordingly, rather than playing King Canute.

Today, this does not look a good deal for the UK.
But in a few years time?
I'm betting it will.


User currently offlinePaulc From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 1490 posts, RR: 0
Reply 20, posted (8 years 9 months 3 days ago) and read 1954 times:

Is treason still a crime in this country as Blair is certainly guilty by giving up any of the rebate without getting anything in return.

Mrs Thatcher had 'balls' by getting the rebate in the first place - yet the grinning idiot hangs out the white flag and surrenders.

Why should we or any other country continue to pay money into an organisation whose accounts have not been audited and approved for over a decade. If the EU were a business its directors would be in jail by now.

The NHS, education, transport, pensions are all needing money yet we can afford to pay more into the EU pot - sorry we should be getting our own country in order first. The taxes we pay should go into making this country a better place to live.



English First, British Second, european Never!
User currently offlinePyrex From Portugal, joined Aug 2005, 4022 posts, RR: 28
Reply 21, posted (8 years 9 months 3 days ago) and read 1947 times:

Quoting WhiteHatter (Reply 15):
We are much less a farming nation and more of a service and industry nation.

So is Germany and they don't get a rebate. And when was the last time the UK had to integrate a Communist relic into itself? They are the highest contributor to the EU budget and still have to pay for East Germany.

Quoting WhiteHatter (Reply 15):
To go back to France, the problem there is that the farming subsidies are skewed and produce a combination of rich megafarmers and produce surpluses.

May I remind you who exactly is the largest individual beneficiary of farming subsidies in the entire EU?



Read this very carefully, I shall write this only once!
User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 22, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1938 times:

Quoting Pyrex (Reply 21):
So is Germany and they don't get a rebate. And when was the last time the UK had to integrate a Communist relic into itself? They are the highest contributor to the EU budget and still have to pay for East Germany.

Not to the same extent. Without the rebate the UK get less per head of the population back than any other EU state. And whilst the UK is doing quite well, it is far from the richest. The UK receives about £500 a year per person back from the EU, and whilst specific figures of who gets what aren't terribly relevant, it does make you wonder how it is that Luxembourg (not exactly poverty-stricken) receives £15,000 per person from the EU.

[Edited 2005-12-19 11:31:06]


She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently offlineAndreas From Germany, joined Oct 2001, 6104 posts, RR: 31
Reply 23, posted (8 years 9 months 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 1936 times:

Quoting GDB (Reply 9):
now Germany, despite what Chirac might say, under Merkel, is less inclined to always support France.

Amen to that!!! Only, this time it was a no-brainer, Blair let her go ahead without even trying to get the front seat, funny enough, is he ill??

What she did in Bruxelles was chequebook diplomacy, and nothing else, something Germany has done repeatedly in the past...we're quite good at it, too!
Wait and see what happens when the MAIN PROBLEM gets on the table, the subsidies.....  banghead  bomb  gnasher 

The only thing this meeting did show in stupendous clarity: The EU is about money, grab as much as you can and run! Disgusting....and this time they didn't even try to put in disguise by babbling nonsense about ideas and so on...  Wink



I know it's only VfB but I like it!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Rugby: Is This The End Of Schalk Burger posted Tue Jun 20 2006 10:13:00 by MetalInyoni
Is This The End Of Guns N Roses? posted Wed Mar 31 2004 03:57:01 by Jaws707
Is The End Of The Cancun Glory Days? posted Tue Mar 14 2006 20:40:09 by Captaink
Is This The Next President Of France? posted Fri Jul 23 2004 05:18:31 by JAL777
Is The End Of The UN Near? posted Wed Mar 5 2003 23:07:58 by Galaxy5
The End Of "speed Limit"? posted Thu Nov 9 2006 01:19:35 by Palladium
Article - 'Beginnning Of The End Of America' posted Thu Oct 19 2006 15:36:13 by Coyoteguy
The End Of The World Cup? posted Sat Oct 14 2006 05:23:52 by Derico
Is This The Way To.............. Al Jazerra! posted Tue Sep 12 2006 14:41:05 by SQNo1
The End Of The Bush Doctrine posted Fri May 26 2006 16:55:10 by RJpieces