Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Eliminate Entitlements Like Social Security?  
User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13608 posts, RR: 61
Posted (8 years 9 months 6 hours ago) and read 1276 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

According to a recent article, nearly half of the U.S. federal budget went to entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10609044/

WASHINGTON - Three growing entitlement programs consumed nearly half of all federal spending in 2004, and budget analysts expect them to make up an even bigger share in the future.

Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid accounted for more than $1 trillion in the 2004 budget year, according to the Consolidated Federal Funds Report released Tuesday by the Census Bureau.

Overall federal spending was $2.2 trillion, an increase of 5 percent from 2003.



So - other than the "But that's not fair!" argument, why shouldn't these programs be substantially pared back or eliminated entirely?


"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePA110 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2007 posts, RR: 23
Reply 1, posted (8 years 9 months 5 hours ago) and read 1248 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting EA CO AS (Thread starter):
why shouldn't these programs be substantially pared back or eliminated entirely?

Because every modern western society since WW2 has developed a safety net to protect those who would otherwise fall through the cracks. You can't expect retirees who've just lost pensions to be able to afford health care without the likes of Medicare. You can't expect minimum wage workers without any medical coverage to be able to afford even the most basic healthcare without Medicaid. And given the decline and collapse of the employer defined benefit pension system, you cannot expect retiring workers to be able to survive without Social Security.

In general, the cost of healthcare has risen far faster than the ordinary worker's ability to pay for it. Likewise, the volatility of funds within 401k plans and the drop in defined benefit pension plans have made Social Security all the more necessary. Entitlement programs such as Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid should be the most tangible of all benefits for paying taxes.

I usually respect your opinions, but this question is really foolish.

[Edited 2005-12-27 23:31:28]


It's been swell, but the swelling has gone down.
User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13608 posts, RR: 61
Reply 2, posted (8 years 9 months 5 hours ago) and read 1239 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting PA110 (Reply 1):
I usually respect your opinions, but this question is really foolish.

Thanks, but you'll notice I never advocated they be eliminated. I was just asking what arguments there were against doing so, that's all.

Personally, I'm torn - on one hand, I agree that to continue with the programs is noble and benevolent. On the other hand, there's little point in doing so if it will completely bankrupt the nation.



"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 39887 posts, RR: 74
Reply 3, posted (8 years 9 months 5 hours ago) and read 1233 times:

Quoting EA CO AS (Reply 2):
On the other hand, there's little point in doing so if it will completely bankrupt the nation.

Perhaps our leaders should consider this before starting wars.



Bring back the Concorde
User currently offlinePA110 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2007 posts, RR: 23
Reply 4, posted (8 years 9 months 5 hours ago) and read 1225 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting EA CO AS (Reply 2):
On the other hand, there's little point in doing so if it will completely bankrupt the nation.

There are a couple of issues here. In no particular order:

  • If the federal goverment weren't such a feeding trough for politician's egos, we would see more money going into entitlements, and less into political pork (like the infamous Ted Stevens bridge to nowhere), and they wouldn't completley bankrupt the nation.
  • Close tax loopholes that corporations and the extremely wealthy have used to avoid paying their fair share. I'm not talking about raising taxes, but simply forcing everyone to pay their existing tax in full. It is really troubling that the gap between have's and have-not's keeps widening.
  • We know from decades of data, that preventative care programs cost far less than treatment programs, yet the federal goverment is still far too reactive than proactive. Nobody ever wants to spend money to prevent something from happening. But, they then face a far greater cost responding to the outcome (example - New Orleans: could have fixed the levys at a fraction of the cost to deal with the aftermath).


It's been swell, but the swelling has gone down.
User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13608 posts, RR: 61
Reply 5, posted (8 years 9 months 4 hours ago) and read 1218 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting PA110 (Reply 5):
Close tax loopholes that corporations and the extremely wealthy have used to avoid paying their fair share. I'm not talking about raising taxes, but simply forcing everyone to pay their existing tax in full. It is really troubling that the gap between have's and have-not's keeps widening.

Would you support the "Fair Tax" flat tax idea as a solution to this problem? I've read both pros and cons to it, but it seems like the idea has merit...



"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offlinePA110 From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2007 posts, RR: 23
Reply 6, posted (8 years 9 months 4 hours ago) and read 1215 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting EA CO AS (Reply 6):
Would you support the "Fair Tax" flat tax idea as a solution to this problem? I've read both pros and cons to it, but it seems like the idea has merit...

I think even congress has problems with the flat tax, which is probably why they came out with the Alternative Minimum Tax. But Congress being Congress managed to screw that up as well. Now the AMT is a nightmare of shortsighted ness and unintended consequences. If they can't iron out the problems with AMT, then the flat tax should be the way to go.



It's been swell, but the swelling has gone down.
User currently offlineAirCop From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (8 years 9 months 3 hours ago) and read 1193 times:

Most people would end up paying more with a flat tax. On the side I have a small income tax prep business. I seen people with incomes of $150,000 with deductions only paying a 7% effective tax rate. Increase the flat tax to 12-15% its double what they are paying. How about individuals that receive earned income credit. All of sudden instead of getting $3,000 back due to low income they are paying $3,000. For the working class, the answer is not simple. What would help would be a roll back of some of the absurd tax cuts that the Bush year have brought. It was big news last week that Congress approved to cut the spending by nearly $50billion dollars, yet they are posed to pass an additional $90billion in tax cuts that you and me won't qualify for. Anyone with a basic knowledge of math knows that this doesn't add up.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Social Security Privatization Is Back posted Thu Feb 9 2006 22:15:52 by AirCop
Educate Me On Social Security In The US posted Tue Apr 19 2005 21:16:21 by AA61Hvy
Clinton Social Security Plan posted Tue Apr 12 2005 23:59:05 by MaverickM11
Solution To Social Security Mess: Get Fat! posted Thu Mar 17 2005 20:36:24 by N5176Y
Social Security Pamphlet (circa 1936) posted Fri Feb 4 2005 20:49:37 by Air2gxs
Social Security Sham posted Thu Feb 3 2005 16:46:20 by Padcrasher
Bush: No New Taxes To Fix Social Security posted Thu Dec 9 2004 18:03:13 by Falcon84
What's Your Social (Security/Insurance) Number? posted Tue Nov 16 2004 01:53:22 by Bahadir
Loch Ness Monster-Like Creature's Bones Found posted Tue Dec 12 2006 04:21:30 by Luv2fly
German A.netters. Do You Like Wetten Das? posted Mon Dec 11 2006 20:21:51 by RootsAir