Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Don't Be Stupid  
User currently offlineAerospaceFan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 4 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 998 times:

At some point, the active, involved "consumer" of news must actually process the information that he receives. In the last thirty years, the informed listener, viewer, and reader of news has been flooded with, at first, written and video media whose tradition of yellow journalism has in some ways only moved toward anti-govermentalism, and, lately, radio media that simply amplifies the outrage of populist hosts.

At what point -- if any -- is it the responsibility of college professors of political science to say to their charges: "Don't be stupid"?

My view: I don't think that the idea of critical thinking has died, nor that college professors have abdicated their responsibility to teach the importance of penetrating the nonsense that popular culture encourages. Any professor worth his salt realizes that neither the left nor the right has all the answers, and this is pretty much a given.

But the idea that college professors are uniformly, or nearly universally, liberal, has made its way into talk radio, and has portrayed our academic culture as one of stultified, idiotic monomania centered upon liberalism.

In reality, though academia in the social sciences skews toward progressive causes, the fact is that those who succeed see both the left and right, and account for the strengths and weaknesses of both.

So, to Rush Limbaugh and Al Franken alike, I say: Dudes, for a change, it's time for you to listen. Dear Rush, and dear Al: Don't take us for chumps, and dudes -- don't be stupid.

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineArmitageShanks From UK - England, joined Dec 2003, 3552 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (8 years 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 946 times:

Quoting AerospaceFan (Thread starter):
But the idea that college professors are uniformly, or nearly universally, liberal,

But most college professors are liberal.


User currently offlineAerospaceFan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 4 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 894 times:

Quoting ArmitageShanks (Reply 1):
But most college professors are liberal.

Perhaps most social science college professors are, but I think that that may be a separate issue.


User currently offlineAerospaceFan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 3 weeks ago) and read 815 times:

I started this thread a week ago, but the cautionary admonition in the title of this thread applies with equal force today, and this time, to the debates between pro- and anti-illegal forces on talk radio, and, perhaps in time, on college campuses, as well.

There is an additional factor that perhaps hasn't been emphasized, however, that should: The element of result. It seems to me that it is precisely because of the endless debates that are generated in modern life that few things get done.

Think of the efforts to rebuild on New York's World Trade Center site, for example. Four years after the fact, and the Port Authority and the site's lessee are embroiled in a possibly terminal controversy. Beyond that, the families of 9/11 victims are now determined to press forward for a redesign of the WTC's memorial. Thus, the buildings that are contemplated remain unbuilt.

Here in California, an important toll road going through sensitive lands in Orange County is being delayed at the last minute through two separate lawsuits filed by the Attorney-General, claiming an insufficiency of study on viable alternatives and an imposition, however small, upon sacred Native lands. Every day of delay costs the taxpayer millions of dollars, and the roads become more congested in the meantime.

As a society, we may be becoming paralyzed by not only rhetoric, but also a critical inability to make decisions based on sound, logical reasoning.

The bold and assertive outlook that built our continental empire is no longer the norm, and taking its place is an empire only of words.

[Edited 2006-03-28 07:10:25]

User currently offlineJafa39 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (8 years 2 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 783 times:

Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 3):
The bold and assertive outlook that built our continental empire is no longer the norm

That in itself is part of the problem, every part of every empire is built on blood and thievery, guilt will always haunt these lands and those who think that money and growth is more important than preserving the last vestiges of dignity and possession of the idigenous peoples should be taken out and given the hard word.

NZ is at least making an effort to put right some of the wrongs (Maori gave half the Auckland Isthmus to Governor Hobson back in the day, he thanked them by stealing the rest of it off them).

Govts cause all the bad shit in the world and now they can't hack the back-lash!

Sod the lot of them! that simpering ninny Blair has dared to show his face in NZ and been made to feel unwelcome, Bush would be too, true we're not perfect but don't go whingeing on about how unfair it is that govts can't just go around railroading the people they are elected to support, the world is changing, people are better informed and able to say "No".


User currently offlineAerospaceFan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 720 times:

Quoting Jafa39 (Reply 4):

That in itself is part of the problem, every part of every empire is built on blood and thievery, guilt will always haunt these lands and those who think that money and growth is more important than preserving the last vestiges of dignity and possession of the idigenous peoples should be taken out and given the hard word.

But there is a good side of this assertiveness, as well. There would not be a United States had there not been a Lewis and Clark, nor a desire to explore, come what may.

I do not deny the harm caused to indigenous peoples. And yet, if mankind had always been satisfied with what merely was, and failed to do and to make (in the Weberian sense), rather than to accept or to argue, then we would all still be lighting fires in the dark beside our caves, huddled together for safety against the saber-toothed tiger.

America doesn't exist simply to debate, or to set up straw men that the opposing side can destroy. America exists, in part, so that the future can be better than today. All that argument and polarization allows is for opposing sides to feel good about their opposition. And in the meantime, nothing is done. The replacement for the WTC in New York remains unbuilt. Our disagreements rule the day.

This perpetual, artificial conflict is good for nothing, except, perhaps, the talkmeisters and polemicists who are made to feel powerful for the setting of the same old, and decrepit, agenda: Talk, debate, and, ultimately, intellectual sterility.


User currently offlineRedngold From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 6907 posts, RR: 45
Reply 6, posted (8 years 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 703 times:

One of the worst acts of stupidity that I see today is the assumption that, if a person doesn't agree with you, that they haven't researched and evaluated information on that particular topic. Calling your opponent "ignorant" is a cop-out based on a wild generalization.


Up, up and away!
User currently offlineAerospaceFan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (8 years 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 695 times:

Quoting Redngold (Reply 6):
One of the worst acts of stupidity that I see today is the assumption that, if a person doesn't agree with you, that they haven't researched and evaluated information on that particular topic. Calling your opponent "ignorant" is a cop-out based on a wild generalization.

I agree. I think that most people who argue a position, particularly if they do so with rationality, do so out of some form of proof. Whether that proof stands up to scrutiny is important to consider. But to say that one's opponent is ignorant without accounting for the grounds for their reasoning is, as you say, all too easy.


User currently offlineSaxdiva From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 2382 posts, RR: 43
Reply 8, posted (8 years 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 678 times:

Quoting AerospaceFan (Thread starter):
But the idea that college professors are uniformly, or nearly universally, liberal, has made its way into talk radio, and has portrayed our academic culture as one of stultified, idiotic monomania centered upon liberalism.

In reality, though academia in the social sciences skews toward progressive causes, the fact is that those who succeed see both the left and right, and account for the strengths and weaknesses of both.

So, to Rush Limbaugh and Al Franken alike, I say: Dudes, for a change, it's time for you to listen. Dear Rush, and dear Al: Don't take us for chumps, and dudes -- don't be stupid.

I think you've hit on a critically important topic here, and it's one that I don't see very many people talking about. You and I are in about the same age group (I wasn't old enough to be aware of the political environment during the Vietnam era), and I don't know if I ever recall society being as polarized as it is right now. I have to shake my head in disbelief when I hear the usual line about the "liberal" media... huh? Here in Los Angeles, the English-language radio dial seems to be especially dominated by conservative media and talk radio. While I'd freely acknowledge that the social sciences in education are rife with liberals (and I'd guess it's because those fields tend to attract people who are more liberally-inclined to begin with), I don't know if anyone can make the same claim for the hard sciences, or engineering, or business, which is the area I teach in.

By now I'd imagine I've heard just about all the rhetoric that each side has in its stockpile, and the fact that little of it represents the views of a wide range of centrist Americans is what, I suspect, is causing people to either adopt the position of what they see the lesser of the evils, or check out of the political process altogether. They might vote, but they're not active in ways that will help get other centrists into offices where they can accomplish anything. So we march on... and as the political dialogue becomes increasingly divisive and those at the poles scream louder and louder, the mainstream gradually loses its voice altogether. For the first time in my life, I am beginning to grow uneasy about our political and intellectual future.

Because of all this, I have to regularly remind myself that I can only do my part in trying to get people to think. None of this helped by a student population that seems to avoid that at almost every opportunity, but I do my damndest to remind people that yes, it's okay to be successful, but it is also our responsibility as business leaders to think about the consequences of our actions. That's why I do a section on ethics in EVERY class I teach, and it's also why, during these segments, I remind students that every rhetorical position has its flaws, and there isn't much we hear or read that be taken at face value. It's an uphill battle, but I suppose it's become a calling for me now.

Thanks for raising this topic,
Leanne


User currently offlineAerospaceFan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (8 years 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 676 times:

^^Thank you for your kind comments. Reading your message and noting the rationality of your arguments, I see that I am in good company!

User currently offlineMaury From United States of America, joined May 2005, 532 posts, RR: 2
Reply 10, posted (8 years 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 670 times:

..the more the people at the poles yell, the fewer people go to the polls.

Quoting Saxdiva (Reply 8):
It's an uphill battle, but I suppose it's become a calling for me now.

Yay Saxdiva!  Smile


User currently offlineLehpron From United States of America, joined Jul 2001, 7028 posts, RR: 21
Reply 11, posted (8 years 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 651 times:

Quoting AerospaceFan (Thread starter):
At some point, the active, involved "consumer" of news must actually process the information that he receives

Are you implying females are not active or involved? Big grin



The meaning of life is curiosity; we were put on this planet to explore opportunities.
User currently offlineJafa39 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (8 years 2 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 633 times:

Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 5):
there is a good side of this assertiveness, as well. There would not be a United States

I'm sorry but I can't support that statement, I think all that assertiveness has got out of control. The US seems to me to be entirely about money being assertive, if anyone wants to assert something else, like culture or heritage or maybe even the opinions of ordinary folk they are regaled as nay-sayers and taunted, harrassed and generally abused.

The assertive ones slate Liberals for appearing to care about issues other than profit. It isn't a case of the biggest, richest bully being right because he can afford the most muscle and leverage.


Maybe we would have been better to stay in our caves....


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Don't Be A Dick posted Sat Dec 21 2002 10:46:45 by TechRep
Top 10 Reasons Why It's Better To Be Stupid posted Sat Nov 18 2000 20:31:22 by Teahan
I Don't Mean To Be A Jerk, But....... posted Fri Oct 27 2006 04:11:00 by HPLASOps
Stupid/ Abusive Parents Should Be Shot posted Wed Apr 19 2006 03:11:27 by Cadet57
Don't Lie You'll Be Caught Out In Strange Ways posted Tue Jan 11 2005 16:06:29 by Oly720man
Ann Coulter - Could She Be Any More Stupid? posted Sun Nov 7 2004 07:16:05 by Vafi88
Old People And Why I Don't Wanna Be One posted Thu Jun 27 2002 02:57:33 by OzarkD9S
Shouldn't Santa Be Dead? posted Sat Dec 2 2006 18:41:29 by Iamcanadian
To Be A Intern On The Opie And Anthony Radio Show posted Sat Dec 2 2006 01:28:10 by AAFLT1871
Friday's Stupid Thread - How Many Passwords... posted Fri Dec 1 2006 07:12:41 by UTA_flyinghigh