Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
The Concept Of "Security"  
User currently offlineTbar220 From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7013 posts, RR: 23
Posted (10 years 2 months 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 2748 times:

Former Democratic senator and presidential candidate Gary Hart made the following comments today on Democracy Now! in an interview with Amy Goodman. They are well thought out in my opinion.


AMY GOODMAN: On the issue of global warming, this is an issue you take on. Gary Hart, author of The Shield and the Cloak: The Security of the Commons, you talk about military security, but you also talk about other ways to increase security.

GARY HART: I think we have to broaden our understanding of what it means to be secure in the 21st century. The 20th century clearly was a century of ideology. We defeated imperialism, we defeated fascism. We stood off communism. And that ended in 1991. And now, we're not clear on -- I mean, war on terrorism replaced containment of communism as our central organizing principle. But if you've lost your job, you're not secure. If your children are contaminated by pollutants, you're not secure. If your son or daughter loses their lives -- their life in Gulf War III, IV or V, so your neighbor can drive his Humvee, you're not secure. So we have to broaden our understanding of what security means to include the environment, to include energy, to include economic livelihood. And I don't know anyone else that's making this argument.

And second, the idea of national security is simply eroding, because America can't be secure if the rest of the world is insecure. So rather than go it alone, as we are right now, we desperately need international alliances and friends and partners, both to deal with terrorism, but also to address issues like global warming. The challenges of the 21st century include mass migration south to north -- the Europeans and we are suffering -- I mean, are experiencing this; climate change and global warming; weapons of mass destruction; and the list goes on. Those do not lend themselves to military solutions, nor can any single nation solve any of those problems.


What are your thoughts? I think they are spot on.

Source: Democracy Now!

NO URLS in signature
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Lions' CB Blames QB For The Firing Of "Mooch" posted Tue Nov 29 2005 20:49:58 by Falcon84
UK ID Cards (the Price Of "freedom") posted Mon May 30 2005 01:40:25 by Planespotterx
Go On A Cruise With The Cast Of "Airline" posted Fri Feb 18 2005 09:20:59 by Beefer
Art Lovers Scream At The Robbing Of "The Scream" posted Sun Aug 22 2004 14:42:01 by L-188
The Legend Of "Love Rollercoaster" posted Thu Sep 6 2001 18:57:41 by Matt D
The End Of "speed Limit"? posted Thu Nov 9 2006 01:19:35 by Palladium
"The Last King Of Scotland" posted Sat Oct 7 2006 14:15:10 by Thomasphoto60
Ever Been Been The Topic Of "talk" When Nearby? posted Fri Jun 16 2006 18:52:48 by NWOrientDC10
"Bling" - The Bane Of Those With Taste posted Wed May 24 2006 09:02:25 by Cfalk
"The 'Wisdom' Of Paris Hilton" (Daily Telegraph) posted Tue Jan 31 2006 00:01:11 by Aloges