Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Will Exxon Be Kicked Out Of Venezuela By 07?  
User currently offlineDerico From Argentina, joined Dec 1999, 4316 posts, RR: 11
Posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 1832 times:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060330/...p_on_bi_ge/venezuela_oil_offensive

With the high oil prices, and the fact that Venezuela does have other 'non-western' companies to give the infraestructure of Exxon to, do you think that company will start 2007 with one of it's arms cut off?


My internet was not shut down, the internet has shut me down
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineArmitageShanks From UK - England, joined Dec 2003, 3645 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 1822 times:

If Venezuela wants to maintain its "fuck you" money from oil supplies it should deal very seriously with these iseues. I would guess this will die down in the next couple of months.

If the oil companies start to act on their statements, Chavez will have some major problems on his hands.


User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1810 times:

This is quite possible, and it has happened before in other OPEC countries. There is of course an element of greed here as well. Since Chavez took over the government, oil revenues to him have increased by several hundred percent, and still he wants more. Either that means that his social programs have become tremendously expensive, or that a lot of that money is being siphoned off into bank accounts in Switzerland and the Jersey Islands.

User currently onlineSuperfly From Thailand, joined May 2000, 40065 posts, RR: 74
Reply 3, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1805 times:

Quoting Cfalk (Reply 2):
Since Chavez took over the government

 redflag 

He was elected and re-elected!

Quoting Cfalk (Reply 2):
There is of course an element of greed...

Who does he think he is? Amurika?  dopey 



Bring back the Concorde
User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 1795 times:

Quoting Superfly (Reply 3):
He was elected and re-elected!

Your point?

Quoting Superfly (Reply 3):
Who does he think he is? Amurika?

Your point?


User currently offlineMrmeangenes From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 566 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1772 times:

I don't understand why all the concern !

Why,according to folks like superfly, Venezuela is a wobderful place to do business-

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...le/2006/03/30/AR2006033002326.html

Isn't it ?



gene
User currently offlineBushpilot From South Africa, joined Jul 2007, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1767 times:

Venezuela is better off without Exxon. In terms of corporations they are the scum of the earth. Despite making 36billion usd in 2005 alone they have yet to pay a dime out in 5billion usd class action lawsuit filed 16 years ago by the fisherman of Alaska after the Exxon Valdez disaster.
If there ever were an oil spill you can count on exxon to do the littlest amount to clean it up. I wouldnt imagine Ven. has the enviromental laws AK does and could get away with far more. Do yourselves a favor and boot them out early.


User currently offlineMrmeangenes From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 566 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 1760 times:

Bushpilot,you left out a few things, didn't you ?

Exxon argues it should have to pay no more than $25 million in punitive damages.

The corporation, which reported third-quarter earnings of $10 billion, says it has spent more than $3 billion to settle federal and state lawsuits and to clean the Prince William Sound area.

In two previous appeals, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ordered U.S. District Judge H. Russel Holland of Anchorage to reduce the judgment against Exxon, saying it was unconstitutionally excessive.

Holland begrudgingly complied in 2002, reducing it to $4 billion. Irving, Texas-based Exxon appealed, and Holland was ordered to revisit the decision again. He called Exxon's actions "reprehensible," and set the figure at $4.5 billion plus interest.


What I'm asking-without commenting on the rights or wrongs of the case, is whether you forgot the $3 billion already paid ?



gene
User currently offlineBushpilot From South Africa, joined Jul 2007, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 1751 times:

Quoting Mrmeangenes (Reply 7):
What I'm asking-without commenting on the rights or wrongs of the case, is whether you forgot the $3 billion already paid ?

I didnt trust me, $2b was paid for the cleanup itself(which the balked at paying for at first) The rest of the 1b paid fines and other things of that sort to state, fed, and local governments. Not a nickel has been paid to any fisherman for thier lost wages.

Quoting Mrmeangenes (Reply 7):
He called Exxon's actions "reprehensible," and set the figure at $4.5 billion plus interest.

Ok well 4.5b plus interest is close enough to 5billion for me, in the meantime close to 10% of the fisherman involved in the suit have died, its been 17 fricking years pay up!

Quoting Mrmeangenes (Reply 7):
Exxon argues it should have to pay no more than $25 million in punitive damages.

Why? They have destroyed fisheries that were thriving in the pre-spill days. It effected the whole fishing industry even that areas not effected by the spill. I live over 1000 coastal miles away from the PWS spill area. The price of red salmon(my area's main species) went from $2-2.25 a pound in 1988 to 50cents! in 1990. This was all due to backlash from the spill and the thought the fish was tainted. Irrepairable damage was done they need to pay up. They ruined the livelihoods of thousands in this state. $4.5b is the amount figured lost for fisherman in the years surrounding the spill and therefore fair in my book and pretty much anyone elses book if your not an exxon share holder.


User currently offlineMrmeangenes From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 566 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 1736 times:

I'm a LONG way from being an Exxon shareholder !

What struck me was the the 9th Ct of Appeals -considered by many to be the most "liberal", least "business-friendly" court in the nation-sent the case back twice for re-calculation of damages, saying the amount levied was unconstitutional.



gene
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Black Boxes Should Be Made Out Of Keith Richards posted Sat May 13 2006 20:00:47 by Georgetown
Ever Been Kicked Out Of A Bar? posted Sat Oct 29 2005 01:03:40 by BristolFlyer
Teacher Kicked Out Of School For Bush Pic posted Tue Oct 5 2004 01:12:48 by USAirways737
Ever Had The Crap Kicked Out Of You? posted Mon Mar 22 2004 23:25:32 by Splitzer
Israeli Ambassador "kicked" Out Of Swedish Museum posted Sun Jan 18 2004 18:19:04 by Airmale
Should Turkey Be Thrown Out Of Euro 2004? posted Thu Jun 12 2003 12:04:06 by David_itl
Al Jazeera Kicked Out Of Iraq! posted Thu Apr 3 2003 06:37:50 by Airworthy
Clinton/Gore Will Be The Kiss Of Death For Kerry posted Mon Oct 25 2004 19:19:32 by Techrep
Who Will Be Fifa Player Of The Year? posted Tue Oct 5 2004 23:51:11 by Imonti
The Death Of TWFirst Volumes, Will It Be Missed? posted Mon Sep 10 2001 11:34:36 by Thom@s