Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
U.S. May Field Battlefield Laser Weapons By 2010  
User currently offlineAerospaceFan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 1112 times:

Forget all you've read about bulky chemical lasers -- the kind you need to shoot down missiles from a hundred miles away. Solid-state lasers, comparable to the kind of weapons you see on Star Trek: Enterprise^1, may be the wave of the future.

One of the largest defense contractors in the world has been tasked with the objective of building lasers so small and powerful, they can be deployed in armored vehicles to destroy enemy missiles and projectiles at the speed of light.

So far, the signs are promising.

See:

http://www.irconnect.com/noc/press/pages/news_releases.mhtml?d=91947

(Excerpt)

Quote:
"We're anxious to move forward with scaling up to the 100 kW power level in Phase 3 of the program," noted Alexis Livanos, president of Northrop Grumman Space Technology. "With parallel funding for attendant laser weapon system technologies and demonstrations, systems using very high-power lasers could be deployed in as little as four to five years."

____________________________________
1. Information from Popular Science, May, 2006 edition:


http://www.popsci.com/popsci/aviatio...010vgnvcm1000004eecbccdrcrd/2.html

[Edited 2006-05-22 16:59:44]

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineOly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6604 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 1096 times:

Quoting AerospaceFan (Thread starter):
So far, the signs are promising.

Depending on which side of the laser you are standing on.



wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
User currently offlineAerospaceFan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 1092 times:

Quoting Oly720man (Reply 1):
Depending on which side of the laser you are standing on.

True, and, in principle, that's been the case ever since they invented the slingshot.

[Edited 2006-05-22 17:02:31]

User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 54
Reply 3, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 1092 times:

Quoting AerospaceFan (Thread starter):
has been tasked with the objective of

And having been given all those lovely dollars, the chances of them saying "Nah, it'll never work" are....?



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently offlineAerospaceFan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 1076 times:

Quoting Banco (Reply 3):
And having been given all those lovely dollars, the chances of them saying "Nah, it'll never work" are....?

I don't know. They've scaled it up considerably in the last several years. The loser in the project achieved powers up to 45 kilowatts, if you read the Popular Science article.

If you consider that two or three years ago, a U.S.-Israeli battlefield prototype was tested that shot down a projectile, well....

This could be the real thing, folks.

[Edited 2006-05-22 17:13:36]

User currently offlineAerospaceFan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1042 times:

One more thing: If they develop smaller and smaller laser weapons, pretty soon they'll be so small that private citizens will want to keep them.

Query: Would the Second Amendment protect the private possession of lethal laser weapons?


User currently offlineEA CO AS From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 13255 posts, RR: 62
Reply 6, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1026 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 5):
Query: Would the Second Amendment protect the private possession of lethal laser weapons?

Why? Nowhere in the Second Amendment does it specifically say firearms...it just says ARMS. I think laser weaponry would qualify - eventually. Of course one could also argue that you could apply this same argument to nuclear weapons as well, and the government has done a good job of keeping that technology beyond the reach and/or means of civilians for sixty years.

Odds are that weaponized lasers would be out of civilian hands for a long time too, particularly via high prices from manufacturers.



"In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem - government IS the problem." - Ronald Reagan
User currently offlineAerospaceFan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (7 years 11 months 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 975 times:

Quoting EA CO AS (Reply 6):
Why? Nowhere in the Second Amendment does it specifically say firearms...it just says ARMS. I think laser weaponry would qualify - eventually

But there are already laws against ownership of machine guns, for example.


User currently offlineGilligan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (7 years 11 months 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 972 times:

The discovery channel did a show on this recently. They are not far away from perfecting the lasar and then engineering it down to a field level size. They already have working models that fit on humvees.

User currently offlineAerospaceFan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (7 years 11 months 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 970 times:

Quoting Gilligan (Reply 8):
The discovery channel did a show on this recently. They are not far away from perfecting the lasar and then engineering it down to a field level size. They already have working models that fit on humvees.

One of the attractive things about solid-state lasers is that there's no need for ammunition, as long as you have power.

Further, I'm sure that it must be recoilless.

And one of the most obvious advantages would be that the "ammunition" travels at the speed of light.


User currently offlineGilligan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (7 years 11 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 965 times:

Quoting AerospaceFan (Reply 9):
One of the attractive things about solid-state lasers is that there's no need for ammunition, as long as you have power.

My question would be will it pass through a human being cauterizing as it goes? If so only a hit to the heart or head would seem to me to be instantly fatal. Could you put polished metal armor on, like from the middle ages, and deflect the beams?


User currently offlineAerospaceFan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (7 years 11 months 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 963 times:

Quoting Gilligan (Reply 10):
My question would be will it pass through a human being cauterizing as it goes? If so only a hit to the heart or head would seem to me to be instantly fatal. Could you put polished metal armor on, like from the middle ages, and deflect the beams?

Cauterization would not necessarily result in complete staunching of blood loss, but that's just speculation on my part.

Regarding metallic mirrors, I believe that testing using reflective metals either will or has been done and, given what has been said, it appears unlikely that a deployable weapon that can explode mortars in flight will be ineffective against mirrored surfaces.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Sending Weapons By Post posted Tue Aug 6 2002 16:48:14 by Godbless
Ahmedinejad-Europe May Be Hurt By Backing Israel posted Fri Oct 20 2006 12:43:38 by 7474ever
Track And Field Umpire Hit By Javelin. posted Tue Sep 26 2006 11:36:07 by Thom@s
Ozone Hole May Dissapear By 2050 posted Sat May 20 2006 18:46:42 by Derico
Laser Eye Surgery Approved By The FAA? posted Fri Jul 16 2004 03:01:33 by AV8AJET
Opec May Cut Supplies Against Further Price Drop posted Thu Dec 14 2006 16:16:26 by MIAMIx707
Tony Blair Questioned By Police posted Thu Dec 14 2006 14:51:48 by BilgeRat
One Of Our Cats Was Hit By A Car posted Wed Dec 13 2006 22:20:12 by Dragon-wings
Cargo Bay's On Stand-By: My 2nd A.net Birthday posted Sat Dec 9 2006 11:28:52 by AirbusA346
WSJ: Bank Of America May Buy Barclays posted Fri Dec 8 2006 17:19:01 by N328KF