There's a tricky one. I say the Boyscouts from the St. Andreas Church in Hamburg (that's the boyscout group I've been) will beat Canada..........................................not!
Gilligan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 2, posted (7 years 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 3315 times:
NK v SK
Initially NK but both nations would end up radioactive slag piles so it's a net loss for both sides. The victor gets to claim nothing but a wasteland.
India v Pakistan both capitol cities reduced to radioactive ash, Bangladesh ends up the clear winner. Finally able to claim some land more than high tide above sea level.
Greece v Turkey no KIA or MIA as it will be a talking war only.
Canada v the Boy Scouts, Canada unless the Boy Scouts have some damn good hockey players that can hold more than a few beers at a time.
Bushpilot From South Africa, joined Jul 2007, 0 posts, RR: 1 Reply 3, posted (7 years 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 3309 times:
Well despite there being no rules in love and war, you should outline the definition a bit more, are allies involved and of course in the case IndiaV Pakistan, and NKvSK, is the bomb in play. Assuming you are talking a one on one conventional war, where other entities stay uninvolved and going with the weapons they have already imported, and can continue to manufacture throughout the war, I dont see any of this happening, as I am sure if there was ever a fight between these countries the international community would step in on one side or the other depending on thier relations with said countries. So Ill give it a go.
I would say NKorea, larger standing army, though troop rations would be an issue for them. IIRC Soeul is in artillery range of the north side of the DMZ.
NorthStarDC4M From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 2804 posts, RR: 40 Reply 14, posted (7 years 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 3224 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW CHAT OPERATOR
1) North Korea v. South Korea
Risky, probably a tie
2) India v. Pakistan
India, assuming a full out war, however Pakistan would be turned into radioactive glass... and Delhi would be a smoking crater... call that victory if you want.
3) Greece v. Turkey
No real winner
4) Canada v. The Boy Scouts
Now lets think here. I bash boy scout troop with hockey stick, they tie some neat knots in a rope and toss it at me, I use a catapult loaded with Tim's XLTTs, they come back with a big stick that the beavers eat before it can be used... errrr... call it a draw
Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
I think this one would be a loss for both. My guess is that NK would nuke Seoul pretty quickly, which would mean the US and Japan for sure would step in as well as the rest of the world. So SK would technically win but with huge consequences.
In a conventional war, India would backhand Pakistan. More soldiers and more sophisticated equipment would make the difference. In a nuclear war, India would still win because it's larger and with more people. Again in a nuclear war, both would still be losers in the end.
"Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a big fat white guy who is threatened by change."
Sponsor Message: 
From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 3636 posts, 
From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 13864 posts, 
I say the Boyscouts from the St. Andreas Church in Hamburg (that's the boyscout group I've been) will beat Canada..........................................not!
From South Africa, joined Jul 2007, 0 posts, 
From United Arab Emirates, joined Jul 2000, 4161 posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 2804 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
