Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Hypothetical Wars: Who Would Win?  
User currently offlineConfuscius From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 3863 posts, RR: 1
Posted (8 years 4 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4300 times:

1) North Korea v. South Korea
2) India v. Pakistan
3) Greece v. Turkey
4) Canada v. The Boy Scouts

These are evenly matched entities, therefore I excluded Israel against any of its Arab neighbors because we all know it's a one-side fight.


Ain't I a stinker?
18 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLTU932 From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 13864 posts, RR: 50
Reply 1, posted (8 years 4 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4286 times:

Quoting Confuscius (Thread starter):
North Korea v. South Korea

South Korea, because the Americans and perhaps the Japanese will back them up. But then again, China might also get involved.

Quoting Confuscius (Thread starter):
India v. Pakistan
Greece v. Turkey

Those would end in a tie.

Quoting Confuscius (Thread starter):
Canada v. The Boy Scouts

There's a tricky one.  scratchchin  I say the Boyscouts from the St. Andreas Church in Hamburg (that's the boyscout group I've been) will beat Canada..........................................not!


User currently offlineGilligan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 4 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4276 times:

NK v SK
Initially NK but both nations would end up radioactive slag piles so it's a net loss for both sides. The victor gets to claim nothing but a wasteland.

India v Pakistan both capitol cities reduced to radioactive ash, Bangladesh ends up the clear winner. Finally able to claim some land more than high tide above sea level.

Greece v Turkey no KIA or MIA as it will be a talking war only.

Canada v the Boy Scouts, Canada unless the Boy Scouts have some damn good hockey players that can hold more than a few beers at a time.


User currently offlineBushpilot From South Africa, joined Jul 2007, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (8 years 4 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4270 times:

Well despite there being no rules in love and war, you should outline the definition a bit more, are allies involved and of course in the case IndiaV Pakistan, and NKvSK, is the bomb in play. Assuming you are talking a one on one conventional war, where other entities stay uninvolved and going with the weapons they have already imported, and can continue to manufacture throughout the war, I dont see any of this happening, as I am sure if there was ever a fight between these countries the international community would step in on one side or the other depending on thier relations with said countries. So Ill give it a go.

Quoting Confuscius (Thread starter):
1) North Korea v. South Korea

I would say NKorea, larger standing army, though troop rations would be an issue for them. IIRC Soeul is in artillery range of the north side of the DMZ.

Quoting Confuscius (Thread starter):
2) India v. Pakistan

India would win I believe simply on population superiority alone.

Quoting Confuscius (Thread starter):
3) Greece v. Turkey

This one would be a toss up for me, just to play the stereotypes here, Turks would be to stoned and the greeks to drunk to actually fight  duck 

Quoting Confuscius (Thread starter):
4) Canada v. The Boy Scouts

Well are the boy scouts allowed pistols in Canada? Because that might be the edge the boys need.


User currently offlineMarco From United Arab Emirates, joined Jul 2000, 4169 posts, RR: 11
Reply 4, posted (8 years 4 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4267 times:

Canada v. The Boy Scouts

The boy scouts, we don't even have a proper army ...



Proud to be an Assyrian!
User currently offlineAerospaceFan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 4 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4264 times:

Quoting Confuscius (Thread starter):
1) North Korea v. South Korea
2) India v. Pakistan
3) Greece v. Turkey
4) Canada v. The Boy Scouts

1. It depends if nukes are used. If not, then South Korea, especially since the U.S. would help.

2. India.

3. Turkey, I think. Not sure, though.

4. Canada.


User currently offlineLTU932 From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 13864 posts, RR: 50
Reply 6, posted (8 years 4 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4256 times:

Quoting Gilligan (Reply 2):
Canada unless the Boy Scouts have some damn good hockey players that can hold more than a few beers at a time.

 rotfl   rotfl   rotfl 

That was priceless. Big grin


User currently offlineBobster2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (8 years 4 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 4242 times:

You can answer all these questions on "Google Fight".

For example,

South Korea beats North Korea:
http://www.googlefight.com/index.php...ord1=north+korea&word2=south+korea

Cananda beats the Boy Scouts by a wide margin.
http://www.googlefight.com/index.php...n_GB&word1=canada&word2=boy+scouts


User currently offlineConfuscius From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 3863 posts, RR: 1
Reply 8, posted (8 years 4 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4222 times:

Here's my take...

1) Tie: A tug-of-war but both would end up on their respective side of the 38th parallel.

2) India: A better and more disciplined army.

3) Turkey: Recent history proves the Turks are better.

4) Boy Scouts: Unless you're a harp seal. 

[Edited 2006-05-24 00:27:05]


Ain't I a stinker?
User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (8 years 4 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4214 times:

Quoting Confuscius (Thread starter):
1) North Korea v. South Korea

No One

Quoting Confuscius (Thread starter):
2) India v. Pakistan

No One

Quoting Confuscius (Thread starter):
3) Greece v. Turkey

No One

Quoting Confuscius (Thread starter):
4) Canada v. The Boy Scouts

 rotfl 


User currently offlineEWRCabincrew From United States of America, joined May 2006, 5523 posts, RR: 56
Reply 10, posted (8 years 4 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4214 times:

Well if Ally Sheedy and Mathew Broderick are involved...

Would you like to play a game?

(W.O.P.P.E.R. from the movie "War Games")



You can't cure stupid
User currently offlineTheSonntag From Germany, joined Jun 2005, 3595 posts, RR: 29
Reply 11, posted (8 years 4 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4193 times:

In nuclear age, wars between big armies cannot be won anymore.

Quoting EWRCabincrew (Reply 10):
(W.O.P.P.E.R. from the movie "War Games")

The only winning move is not to play!


User currently offlineEWRCabincrew From United States of America, joined May 2006, 5523 posts, RR: 56
Reply 12, posted (8 years 4 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4193 times:

Quoting TheSonntag (Reply 11):
The only winning move is not to play!

What he said!!  laughing 



You can't cure stupid
User currently offlineFalcon84 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (8 years 4 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4186 times:

Did a few of my own: Venezuela better watch out in pissing off Mexico. According to GoogleFight, Mexico kicks their butts.  bigthumbsup 

User currently offlineNorthStarDC4M From Canada, joined Apr 2000, 3024 posts, RR: 36
Reply 14, posted (8 years 4 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4185 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
CHAT OPERATOR

1) North Korea v. South Korea

Risky, probably a tie

2) India v. Pakistan

India, assuming a full out war, however Pakistan would be turned into radioactive glass... and Delhi would be a smoking crater... call that victory if you want.

3) Greece v. Turkey

No real winner

4) Canada v. The Boy Scouts

Now lets think here. I bash boy scout troop with hockey stick, they tie some neat knots in a rope and toss it at me, I use a catapult loaded with Tim's XLTTs, they come back with a big stick that the beavers eat before it can be used... errrr... call it a draw  box 



Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.
User currently offlineCadet57 From United States of America, joined Jul 2005, 9085 posts, RR: 30
Reply 15, posted (8 years 4 months 2 days ago) and read 4172 times:

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 9):
Quoting Confuscius (Thread starter):
1) North Korea v. South Korea

No One

Quoting Confuscius (Thread starter):
2) India v. Pakistan

No One

Quoting Confuscius (Thread starter):
3) Greece v. Turkey

No One

Quoting Confuscius (Thread starter):
4) Canada v. The Boy Scouts


 rotfl 

Quoting Confuscius (Thread starter):
1) North Korea v. South Korea

SK, georgie pordgie would come to their aid.

Quoting Confuscius (Thread starter):
2) India v. Pakistan

India

Quoting Confuscius (Thread starter):
3) Greece v. Turkey

?

Quoting Confuscius (Thread starter):
4) Canada v. The Boy Scouts

Boy scouts.



Doors open, right hand side, next stop is Springfield.
User currently offlineMdsh00 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 4125 posts, RR: 8
Reply 16, posted (8 years 4 months 2 days ago) and read 4159 times:

Quoting Confuscius (Thread starter):
1) North Korea v. South Korea

I think this one would be a loss for both. My guess is that NK would nuke Seoul pretty quickly, which would mean the US and Japan for sure would step in as well as the rest of the world. So SK would technically win but with huge consequences.

Quoting Confuscius (Thread starter):
2) India v. Pakistan

In a conventional war, India would backhand Pakistan. More soldiers and more sophisticated equipment would make the difference. In a nuclear war, India would still win because it's larger and with more people. Again in a nuclear war, both would still be losers in the end.



"Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a big fat white guy who is threatened by change."
User currently offlineDuff44 From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 1723 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (8 years 4 months 2 days ago) and read 4150 times:

North Korea vs South Korea
Winner: The US short-track speed skating team

India vs Pakistan
Winner: American computer users needing tech support

Greece vs Turkey
Winner: Cyprus enters the ring with a folding chair and cleans house

Canada vs Boy Scouts
Winner: George W. Bush, after figuring out the the French translation of "Hanging Chad"



I'll rassle ya for a bowl of bacon!
User currently offlineJutes85 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (8 years 4 months 2 days ago) and read 4144 times:

Quoting Confuscius (Thread starter):

1) North Korea v. South Korea
2) India v. Pakistan
3) Greece v. Turkey
4) Canada v. The Boy Scouts

USA for all, cause you know they have to get their noses into everything.

Quoting Marco (Reply 4):
The boy scouts, we don't even have a proper army ...

Must be a University student........


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Who Would Win In A Fight.... posted Sat Feb 19 2005 19:43:11 by Sv7887
Who Would Win The Straight Out Fights posted Thu Mar 20 2003 02:50:00 by Bmi330
Gen. Pace: U.S. Would Win War In N. Korea posted Sun Oct 15 2006 09:46:42 by AerospaceFan
Who Would Murder This Kid? posted Sat Oct 7 2006 03:04:28 by PlymSpotter
Who Would You Make A Sex Tape With? posted Tue Sep 26 2006 06:17:00 by STLGph
American League Wild Card- Who's Gonna Win It? posted Wed Aug 23 2006 20:10:49 by N808NWatMSP
Who Will Win The British Open posted Fri Jun 30 2006 21:49:36 by Handcuffs
If You Were A Ghost.... Who Would You Haunt? posted Thu Jun 29 2006 14:02:17 by Nighthawk
Who Will Win WM2006? posted Tue May 30 2006 23:50:14 by Skyman
Who Will Win American Idol? posted Sat Feb 25 2006 08:37:12 by 9VSPO