Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Could Iran Be Barred From The World Cup?  
User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7413 posts, RR: 50
Posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2271 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

John McCain is introducing a bill to be banned from the World Cup competition. Interesting events to follow.


Made from jets!
29 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20685 posts, RR: 62
Reply 1, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2268 times:

Why. On. Earth.


International Homo of Mystery
User currently offlineDuff44 From United States of America, joined Apr 2006, 1723 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2265 times:

And the US has control over the World Cup?

Oh yeah.... the US Government. I forgot, they control EVERYTHING.

 Yeah sure



I'll rassle ya for a bowl of bacon!
User currently offlineSabena332 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 2251 times:

Quoting Duff44 (Reply 2):
And the US has control over the World Cup?

No, they wouldn't even have control over the WC when they would be the host country. The FIFA is the organisation who is deciding about the participating teams, nobody else!

I had suported a ban against Iran (because of their completely insane president), but now it is too late I think, the WC is already beginning in 14 days and I highly doubt that the FIFA will kick Iran out!

Patrick


User currently offlineArsenal@LHR From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 7792 posts, RR: 20
Reply 4, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2233 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

No nation can 'ban' another country from participating in the world cup, and frankly, why should they? Only FIFA has that authority. And why do people insist on politicising everything? Iran might have a dickhead leader, but why should Iranian footballers, their fans and their people miss out on participating in the world cup (or any sporting event) because of their leader? Keep politics out of football.

Quoting Jetjack74 (Thread starter):
John McCain is introducing a bill to be banned from the World Cup competition.

Pointless and irrelevant, only FIFA has that jurisdiction.



In Arsene we trust!!
User currently offlineRJpieces From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2222 times:

It's simply a resolution urging FIFA to ban Iran....

Eight co-sponsors so far.


User currently offlineFalcon84 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2222 times:

Quoting Jetjack74 (Thread starter):
John McCain is introducing a bill to be banned from the World Cup competition. Interesting events to follow.

Why is Mr. McCain sticking his nose into an event not being held in the United States, and it doesn't pertain to a U.S. team?

And hasn't he learned, you don't take the policies of a government out on the athletes, who, for the most part, simply want to compete for their nation?

Mr. McCain, stick to REAL U.S. government business, instead of pandering to the ultra-conservatives, 2 years before the Presidential campaign.


User currently offlineJCS17 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 8065 posts, RR: 39
Reply 7, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2222 times:

In my opinion, they should, although its not like McCain's bill could do anything other than make a statement. The opitimal situation, IMO, for Iran at this point would be something along an apartheid-era South Africa thread. In addition to economic embargos, a ban on sports teams participating in international competitions, and strict restrictions on government travel.


America's chickens are coming home to rooooost!
User currently offlineMattCLE From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2214 times:

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 1):
Why. On. Earth.

2008?!?

Here's a press release from McCain's website.
http://mccain.senate.gov/index.cfm?f...r.ViewPressRelease&Content_id=1692


User currently offlineSabena332 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2214 times:

Quoting Arsenal@LHR (Reply 4):
And why do people insist on politicising everything?

I will not politicising this but I have to say that the Iranian team can cause a lot of problems when they are playing here in Germany. They are (or better: their president made them to a) security risk for themself and for people around, thus they should be kicked out.

There are Neo-Nazi groups who have already announced to protest for Ahmadinejad in front of the stadiums where the Iranian team is playing, they like him because he denies the Holocaust and because he announced to destroy Israel (which is by the way a crime here in Germany).

On the other hand have several 100000th of normal people announced to protest against him because they think he is a fuckwith.

Imagine now what can happen infront of a stadium where the Iranian team is playing against whoever...

The team is a security risk and should be banned from the WC because of that. Nobody would blame the Iranian team itself or the Iranian people in general, Mr. Ahmadinejad is to blame in such a case because of his incredible small brain.

Patrick


User currently offlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20685 posts, RR: 62
Reply 10, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2214 times:

I see. This is from April 6th. Shades of ClipperHawaii.


International Homo of Mystery
User currently offlineFalcon84 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2196 times:

Quoting JCS17 (Reply 7):
In my opinion, they should

Of course you do. Becaue you don't remember the idiocy of the Olympic boycotts back in the '80's. It doesn't change government policy; it doesn't do a damn thing but hurt the athletes.

But knowing your stripe, Jcs, I'm utterly not surprised.


User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7413 posts, RR: 50
Reply 12, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2187 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 6):
Why is Mr. McCain sticking his nose into an event not being held in the United States, and it doesn't pertain to a U.S. team?

In the realm of CW, Iran is so insane about Euro-football, (to the point they called a national celebration after Iran qualified) that banning hem from competition might put pressure on the Iranian Gov't to back off from uranium enrichment. A far-fetched idea, and I believe that FIFA rejected the resolution.

Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 6):
And hasn't he learned, you don't take the policies of a government out on the athletes, who, for the most part, simply want to compete for their nation?

That's FIFA's stance. As JCS pointed out, my birth nation of South Africa was barred from competing in international sports during the years of Aparthied.



Made from jets!
User currently offlineStarAC17 From Canada, joined Aug 2003, 3383 posts, RR: 9
Reply 13, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2179 times:

The only team that may get kicked out of the world cup would be England due to rioting fans  duck .


Engineers Rule The World!!!!!
User currently offlineAleksandar From Serbia, joined Jul 2000, 3236 posts, RR: 32
Reply 14, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2167 times:

Quoting Sabena332 (Reply 3):
now it is too late I think

Not necessarily. Back in Euro 1992, Yugoslavia was banned in a matter of days prior to the beginning of the tournament.

Personally, I'm against such measures, but....

Quoting Jetjack74 (Reply 12):
Iran is so insane about Euro-football, (to the point they called a national celebration after Iran qualified) that banning hem from competition might put pressure on the Iranian Gov't to back off from uranium enrichment.

Or it can push them to be more radical. Now, imagine Iran qualifies for the second round and what horror would it be for security forces in Iran to control all those who would celebrate in the streets.



R-E-S-P-E-C-T
User currently offlineFalcon84 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2159 times:

Quoting Jetjack74 (Reply 12):
In the realm of CW, Iran is so insane about Euro-football, (to the point they called a national celebration after Iran qualified) that banning hem from competition might put pressure on the Iranian Gov't to back off from uranium enrichment.

 rotfl   rotfl   rotfl   rotfl 

It didn't sway the Russians to get out of Afghanistan in 1980, did it, when we boycotted? They don't work, and they only hurt the athletes. Iran will go on with it's program no matter what McCain is arguing.

That's just stupid. It's stupid and silly.

Quoting Jetjack74 (Reply 12):
That's FIFA's stance. As JCS pointed out, my birth nation of South Africa was barred from competing in international sports during the years of Aparthied.

And that government lasted for years despite, didn't it?


User currently offlineJCS17 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 8065 posts, RR: 39
Reply 16, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2145 times:

Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 11):
Of course you do. Becaue you don't remember the idiocy of the Olympic boycotts back in the '80's. It doesn't change government policy; it doesn't do a damn thing but hurt the athletes.

But knowing your stripe, Jcs, I'm utterly not surprised.

Just think of those poor, poor Iranian soccer players  crying  . You're so compassionate. When is your candlelight vigil for Uday and Qusay Hussein, again?



America's chickens are coming home to rooooost!
User currently offlinePhotopilot From Canada, joined Jul 2002, 2748 posts, RR: 18
Reply 17, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2142 times:

Hey, maybe we can have a vote to ban Republicans from the Human Race!

Oh, wait a minute. They already are!!!!


User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7413 posts, RR: 50
Reply 18, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2137 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 15):
That's just stupid. It's stupid and silly

Did I say I support it? I was pointing out the conventional wisdom behind the thought. It's not my idea. I agree it would probably be pointless.

Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 15):
And that government lasted for years despite, didn't it?

It was a shame. They arguably had the best rugby back in the 60's. One of the only South Africans to compete in international sport during the ban was the great tennis player Kevin Curren(the reason was because of his affiliation with the University of Texas, where he was an alumn) who played 17 year-old Boris Becker and lost in 4 sets.



Made from jets!
User currently offlineFalcon84 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2137 times:

Quoting JCS17 (Reply 16):
Just think of those poor, poor Iranian soccer players . You're so compassionate. When is your candlelight vigil for Uday and Qusay Hussein, again?

That was so funny I forgot to laugh, Jcs.

Last time I checked, those soccer players hadn't harmed you and your precious CEO-wannabe, dominate-the-employees future, have they? Last time I checked, they didn't do one thing to cause any of this political crap, did they?

The thing with you, if you had your way, anyone who didn't agree with you would be banned from just about anything, because of your holier-than-thou ego, Jcs.

The U.S. Congress has no business even asking FIFA to boot out a nation in an event not even being held in the United States. I WOULD support a Sense of The Senate Resolution asking Germany not to let that screwball running Iraq in, but to take it out on the players, well, shows again that there's no such thing as "compassionate conservatism".


User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7413 posts, RR: 50
Reply 20, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2133 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 19):
I WOULD support a Sense of The Senate Resolution asking Germany not to let that screwball running Iraq in

Screwball in Iraq?



Made from jets!
User currently offlineTheredbaron From Mexico, joined Mar 2005, 2225 posts, RR: 9
Reply 21, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2115 times:

If I am not mistaken Mexico´s first game is against Iran....

Yeah kick em out, we win by default, and please fill the missing game with a good movie...



The best seat in a Plane is the Jumpseat.
User currently offlineME AVN FAN From Switzerland, joined May 2002, 13920 posts, RR: 25
Reply 22, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 2103 times:

Quoting Jetjack74 (Thread starter):
John McCain is introducing a bill to be banned from the World Cup competition.

I am sorry, but has Mr McCain given up as US politician and been elected into the German Bundestag ?  confused   scratchchin  or is he now in FIFA trying to introduce "bills" into this organisation ???


User currently offlineFalcon84 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 23, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 2103 times:

Quoting Jetjack74 (Reply 20):
Screwball in Iraq?

Haha. Sorry about that. Iran. Iran. Iran.

Jeez, one letter, and he goes nuts.  Big grin


User currently offlineJetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7413 posts, RR: 50
Reply 24, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 23 hours ago) and read 2074 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Falcon84 (Reply 23):
Jeez, one letter, and he goes nuts.

Of course. We can't have a civil end to a debate. That's like Seattle without rain.  Wink



Made from jets!
25 Post contains links 11Bravo : Actually it looks like you had it right the first time. http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/meast/05/26/iraq.iran/index.html
26 Post contains images Falcon84 : Hell, Seattle has has nothing on Cleveland the last three weeks, bro.
27 AirframeAS : If the WC was in the U.S., you can bet that the INS & the state department might revoke the visas of the Iranian players. I'm surprised no one thought
28 Bill142 : They can if all nationals from that country aren't permitted to enter.
29 ME AVN FAN : in other words GERMANY could do so, at least in principle, but is a country respecting international law and decent behaviours --- THEY learnt from h
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Will Germany Be Ready For The World Cup? posted Fri Jan 13 2006 18:58:38 by Derico
Togo: Do They Deserve To Be In The World Cup? posted Mon Jun 19 2006 12:18:35 by RootsAir
The End Of The World Cup? posted Sat Oct 14 2006 05:23:52 by Derico
England Has Won The World Cup! posted Wed Oct 11 2006 22:17:57 by Speedbird747BA
Caption The World Cup Final Pic. posted Mon Jul 10 2006 07:35:13 by Thom@s
Don't Watch The World Cup In Somalia! posted Thu Jul 6 2006 19:15:45 by MaverickM11
The World Cup Semifinals Predictions Thread posted Sun Jul 2 2006 07:56:24 by LTU932
An American Rant On The World Cup... posted Wed Jun 28 2006 01:49:29 by WarmNuts
Can You Take Your Team To The World Cup Finals? posted Mon Jun 19 2006 16:30:00 by Greyhound
Refereeing The World Cup posted Tue Jun 13 2006 17:09:01 by IFEMaster