Jetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7335 posts, RR: 52 Reply 2, posted (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1763 times:
Yes, 1st LT Watada stationed at Ft Lewis near Lakewood, WA south of Seattle. According to KVI/Talk570, he's part of a Stryker Brigade that has receievd it's marching orders. The LT is a coward, plain and simple. He signed a contract to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies foreign and domestic. This guy doesn't even have any dependants. Iwould understand somewhat if he had kids, his unwillingness, but that wouldn't excuse it. He would still have to go. But he's a coward. He should of found another way to pay for his college education. COWARD!!!!!
Fumanchewd From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 3, posted (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1754 times:
What an idiot. I'm all for people's opinions but he is an officer. What kind of message does this send to enlisted men and especially his own men? An officer in the military should not behave like this. I would expect it from a small amount of 18-20 year old uneducated privates, seamen, or airman but not him.
Perhaps he should have let the Salvation Army pay for his education and training. If they gave him a post with that bell in a bad neighborhood it would be easier to leave.
Fumanchewd From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 4, posted (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1752 times:
"He has an obligation to fulfill, and it is not up to the individual officer to decide when he is going to deploy or not deploy," said Jerry Newberry, a Vietnam veteran and director of communications for the Veterans of Foreign Wars. "Some other officer will have to go in his place. He needs to think about that."
A Lieutenant,like any other military officer,should know better.
Civilians make policy.Not the military.What a betrayal!
Any war is immoral,all Presidents have lied or made excuses
to get into a war.Bastard!
ANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 6, posted (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 1719 times:
Coward . . . that's all it is. Plain and simple.
Like a few others . . . sign up for the benefits and doesn't want to give anything back. Put on the uniform to impress whomever, and then when the time comes to put up or shut up, he conveniently leaves his balls in his other pants . . .
Welcome to Prisoner Status and Leavenworth. What a piece of crap.
NeilYYZ From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 8, posted (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 1698 times:
Quoting Mrmeangenes (Reply 7): I have an idea he'll be hiding in Canada by then-but this time, may find the reception noticeably cooler
Find out where he goes in Canada and I'll go escort him back over the nearest border crossing. You don't get to pick and choose what assignments you get, you go where the Army tells you to, even if it is dangerous and as ANCFlyer said, you've left your balls in your other pants.
Jetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7335 posts, RR: 52 Reply 9, posted (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 1684 times:
Quoting Mrmeangenes (Reply 7): Let's wait and see what he does when the actual order to report is issued.
Well, he's already violated Articles #117(making provoking statement), #89(Disrespecting a Superior Commissioned Officer) and #133(Conduct Un-becoming a Commissioned Officer) of the UCMJ. Lt Watada is hlding another press conference for grandstanding. Ridiculous, just ridiculous. Jerks like this make me fume. I have respect for servicemembers who are in opposition to the war, but serve out their time.
Umm, if he's an officer doesn't he already have his education?
JetJoke's irrational and emotional charge aside, this guy should get aired out to dry. Last time I checked this guy is supposed to be a leader, and his actions are not demonstrating any leadership qualities. If he was a 4 star general, this might make him a maverick, but @ Lt, he's a mid level manager on a good day and a supervisor level normally. Sometimes you have to eat the shit of the upper level managment, this guy is not a good team player. I hope he never gets past making the Fries @ Mc Donalds in the 'real world'
Looking at his uniform, he's wearing crossed rifles which means he's an infantry puke.
As a Lieutenant he's a low-level manager . . . on a good day. Perhaps, on a good day, in a squared away Infantry Platoon, he's got 30 people working for him.
In reality - he's got the pull of a scrub brush and the horsepower of a Volkswagen Beetle - the REAL decision maker is that Platoon Sergeant that has ten tmes the time in service as this Lieutenant. When the shit hits the fan, the troops will always ask, "What now Sarge"? You damn suer won't hear 'em saying "What now L T"?
He may be lucky enough to be a company executive officer . . . in which case he's no more than a glorified ticket puncher . . . . checking the latrine police, watching the mechanics in the motorpool, or checking the mess hall.
Regardless, TedT, JetJack's accusations are spot on . . . and what you know about the US Army, or the UCMJ, JetJack and I could probably piss into a thimble.
The guy's a gawddamn Coward . . . . paint a "P: on his back and send him to roost in Leavenworth!
Halls120 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 15, posted (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1626 times:
Quoting Jetjack74 (Reply 9): Well, he's already violated Articles #117(making provoking statement), #89(Disrespecting a Superior Commissioned Officer) and #133(Conduct Un-becoming a Commissioned Officer) of the UCMJ. Lt Watada is hlding another press conference for grandstanding. Ridiculous, just ridiculous. Jerks like this make me fume. I have respect for servicemembers who are in opposition to the war, but serve out their time.
This is the kind of case JAG's on the prosecution side love. You could raffle off the right to be first chair on this one and hold one hell of a party with the proceeds. The charge sheet on this idiot is going to run several pages. On the other hand, this kind of case makes detailed military defense counsel hide.
I see a shitty mattress, iron bars, and foul food all served up in a certain midwestern facility for the the soon to be court-martialed young idiot.
Jetjack74 From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 7335 posts, RR: 52 Reply 18, posted (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1605 times:
Quoting TedTAce (Reply 12): Umm, if he's an officer doesn't he already have his education?
Ummm, ROTC? Enlisted Commissioning Programme? OCS? If you become a commissioned officer, and you already have a 4 year degree, you are entitled to full tuition reimbursement for those who've already achieved the basic educational requirements to obtaining a commission. I myself could qualify for a commission, but I enjoy my enlisted job, and would have to forfeit my aircrew billet, which i'm unwilling to do.
Quoting TedTAce (Reply 12): JetJoke's irrational and emotional charge aside, this guy should get aired out to dry
Well Ted, is it irrational to expect this guy to adhere to his oath of commission? Is it irrational to be angry at someone who is supposed to be setting an example as to what military bearing is? If this was a attorney violating his oath of confidentiality or Attorney/Client Privilege, would be irrational for his/her fellow lawyers to be outraged and angry. If a doctor violates the Doctor/Patient Privacy Act, would it irrational for fellow MD's to outraged and angry? This guy has barely been in this unit a year, and he's backing away from his duties, while fellow soldiers are going back for their 2nd and 3rd tours in the WOT. That's what sad part is.
I do have a theory that many here are sure to hoot. This could in fact be a plant for the anti-war crowd. Given the fact that his father was an anti-war advocate, I find it hard to believe this guy had any true intentions to begin with. He immediately comes out in the public forum to oppose being sent down-range. I have respect for servicemembers who oppose the war, but continue to serve until their contract is up. I remember someone on here posted an article about a Marine Corporal who returned from the Iraq war, and wrote an article about his opposition to war. That was fine, because he at least served his time and got out. He didn't upstage his fellow marines, and make a controversy over it. Irrational, huh? Well, i'm taking the highroad on this one. But if i'm being called irrational over this, that's fine, i'll take irrationality over cowardice anyday of the week.
Itsjustme From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 2765 posts, RR: 11 Reply 20, posted (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1595 times:
Quoting TedTAce (Reply 12): JetJoke's irrational and emotional charge aside
TedTAce, not only do you lose credibility when you purposely distort the user name of someone you're quoting but it also makes you look like a childish ass. If you're going to resort to such pre-adolescent antics, perhaps you should take your rants over to myspace.com.
There was nothing irrational about JetJack74's post. As he said, this Lt. is a coward and should be disciplined as such.
NeilYYZ From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 23, posted (6 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 1556 times:
Quoting WrenchBender (Reply 11): Then please go find the bunch of deserters that are trying to claim refugee status and get rid of them.
Give me a list of addresses and a total number that I have to send back over the border (that will help me decide which vehicle to bring, either the Camry, 4 Runner or Odyssey, of if need be I can rent a truck).
Quoting WrenchBender (Reply 16):
He chose to disobey and he is still there, unlike Hinzman, Key and at least 10 others who deserted and ran to Canada to hide. I am disgusted that they have been allowed to stay here.
As am I, it's pathetic, I would never expect America to harbor a Canadian deserter, and as such, Canada should be no different, even if we have decided not to participate in Iraq we don't have the be the country that accepts everyone opposed!
I was making the point, that my empathetic side of me would understand his unwillingness to go to war if he had a wife an kids at home. However I would not accept that as excuse from going with your unit on deployment. He signed a contract, and took an oath. He's just making pathetic excuses. Thousands upon thousands of mothers and fathers are going to war. He's just a cowardly excuse for half a man. Half a man would probably still go.
Quoting TedTAce (Reply 21): As for the other stuff, maybe you don't know our history.
To say that we have a history is kinda overdramatising abit, don't you think. We just took pot-shots at one another. Water under the bridge.