Nirmalmakadia From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 223 posts, RR: 0 Reply 4, posted (6 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 1360 times:
Quoting Christeljs (Thread starter): Would you pick 'small bum & big boobs' or big bum and small boobs?
KFLLCFII From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3262 posts, RR: 33 Reply 6, posted (6 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1347 times:
Quoting Christeljs (Thread starter): Would you pick 'small bum & big boobs' or big bum and small boobs?
Interesting that you followed it with a .
Some sort of internal conflict going on at the moment? A big personal decision coming up?
"About the only way to look at it, just a pity you are not POTUS KFLLCFII, seems as if we would all be better off."
Usnseallt82 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 4891 posts, RR: 55 Reply 8, posted (6 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 1337 times:
Quoting Christeljs (Thread starter): Would you pick 'small bum & big boobs' or big bum and small boobs?
KFLLCFII From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 3262 posts, RR: 33 Reply 13, posted (6 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1296 times:
Quoting Christeljs (Thread starter): Would you pick 'small bum & big boobs' or big bum and small boobs?
Sounded like you were gonna choose whether to enhance the top, or go on an all-out eating binge
Anyway, to answer your question: As long as you've got a decent bum (and nice legs to go with it), I don't really care so much about the top...
And in reality, attraction doesn't have to be based solely on physical appearance. Paris Hilton's got a smoking bod, but she's a bitch...And I wouldn't give her the time of day because of it. On the other hand, if you're sweet, caring, likeable, and genuine, you've already scored higher in my book than the hottest girls on the planet if they're unfaithful, conniving, and shallow.
Physical attraction is great, but beauty isn't only skin-deep...
"About the only way to look at it, just a pity you are not POTUS KFLLCFII, seems as if we would all be better off."
David L From United Kingdom, joined May 1999, 9212 posts, RR: 42 Reply 16, posted (6 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1278 times:
A woman with a 'small bum & big boobs' is likely to fall over more often so I guess the other option would be less embarassing and more stable in strong winds.
San747 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 4934 posts, RR: 13 Reply 21, posted (6 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 1190 times:
Quoting Christeljs (Thread starter): Would you pick 'small bum & big boobs' or big bum and small boobs?
Quoting NIKV69 (Reply 7): I am an ass man so I prefer a nice proportional ass to huge bazooms.
NIKV69 pretty much sums it up for me. I'd rather my girl have a proportional ass that fits her body perfectly rather than a girl with huge breasts...
Ilikeyyc From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 1373 posts, RR: 23 Reply 22, posted (6 years 10 months 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1161 times:
BaylorAirBear From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 2913 posts, RR: 52 Reply 23, posted (6 years 10 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 1104 times:
So that's why Johan is always looking over his shoulders.
Personally, I prefer the bottom half to be nice. Fun bubs are fun bubs, so long as they aren't some funky shape or look as though they were arranged by Picasso.
Sponsor Message: 
From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 533 posts, 
From Canada, joined Nov 2005, 1730 posts, 
From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 223 posts, 
From Denmark, joined May 2008, 2091 posts, 
No. 
From Australia, joined Aug 2004, 8320 posts, 
Printer friendly format 
