Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Copyright Question (YouTube Video)  
User currently offlineAloges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8726 posts, RR: 43
Posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1506 times:

So it appears (c'est une poire, oui) FIFA got their panties in a wad over the videos of Zidane's headbutt that people uploaded to YouTube, mine included. I just got a "video rejected due to copyright infringement" e-mail from YouTube stating "a third-party notification by FIFA 2006 claiming that this material is infringing".

The video was a 19 second recording of a replay on ARD, a public German TV station. So to you copyright wizards, is poor and downtrodden FIFA right or should I send a counter notice? I don't quite like how FIFA does everything to commercialise the game and put its brand on it, so the motivation is there.

Screw you, Seppl!

Edit: By the way, they've either just not yet deleted it or FIFA is showing a beautiful display of double standards by letting this video (and others) be: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vOd6de3Voxk

[Edited 2006-07-11 04:06:51]


Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTRVYYZ From Canada, joined Oct 2004, 1373 posts, RR: 10
Reply 1, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 1504 times:

You can upload videos on photobucket if you wish to share it on the forum  Wink

User currently offlineAloges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8726 posts, RR: 43
Reply 2, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1490 times:

Quoting TRVYYZ (Reply 1):
You can upload videos on photobucket if you wish to share it on the forum

Guess what I'm doing right now. Big grin  Wink



Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlineAC773 From Canada, joined Nov 2005, 1730 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1456 times:

Quoting Aloges (Thread starter):
I just got a "video rejected due to copyright infringement" e-mail from YouTube stating "a third-party notification by FIFA 2006 claiming that this material is infringing".

That's total BS. YouTube was built on a foundation of copyrighted material. Last time I checked, much of their content was still that way.



Better to be nouveau than never to have been riche at all.
User currently offlineBill142 From Australia, joined Aug 2004, 8459 posts, RR: 8
Reply 4, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1445 times:

Quoting AC773 (Reply 3):
That's total BS. YouTube was built on a foundation of copyrighted material. Last time I checked, much of their content was still that way.

There is a notice saying copyrighted material can't be uploaded on the upload page.


User currently offlineAC773 From Canada, joined Nov 2005, 1730 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1410 times:

Quoting Bill142 (Reply 4):
There is a notice saying copyrighted material can't be uploaded on the upload page.

Maybe not for upload, but there's still a bunch of copyrighted material on YouTube. Some people even break movies up in to 10-minute clips and post them all on YT. The staff does go through the content once in a while to find and delete that kind of stuff, but they can't catch everything.



Better to be nouveau than never to have been riche at all.
User currently offlineNoUFO From Germany, joined Apr 2001, 7961 posts, RR: 12
Reply 6, posted (8 years 3 months 2 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 1399 times:

Quoting AC773 (Reply 5):
Maybe not for upload, but there's still a bunch of copyrighted material on YouTube.

That's right, you can find entire DVDs of Peter gabriel in concert on YouTube.

Although I'm no lawyer, I'm quite familiar with German copyright law that applies on here in Aloges' case. And yes, as I see it, at least ARD or ZDF (the broadcasters) could file a lawsuit against Aloges, although a legal dissuasion ("Abmahnung") would be more likely. But that is already quite costly.



I support the right to arm bears
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Hilarious YouTube Video posted Fri Oct 20 2006 20:16:26 by KaiGywer
Interesting YouTube Video posted Sat Aug 19 2006 17:23:47 by AA61Hvy
The Funny 'YouTube Video' Thread posted Fri Aug 11 2006 04:26:02 by BMIFlyer
Copyright Question posted Mon Oct 25 2004 15:28:47 by Aa61hvy
Internet Copyright Question posted Fri Feb 6 2004 04:22:00 by Cba
Downloading Video From Youtube. posted Mon Sep 11 2006 21:45:16 by AI
Laptop Video Card Question posted Fri May 5 2006 02:52:30 by Cadet57
Music Video Question posted Fri Nov 18 2005 18:32:52 by Cxsjr
Oasis Video Question - Importance Of Being Idle posted Tue Sep 13 2005 10:34:10 by Gkirk
Mac OS X Video Card Question posted Thu Jan 6 2005 22:11:35 by JBirdAV8r