Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Coors Exec Gets DUI...  
User currently offlineJFKTOWERFAN From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 1100 posts, RR: 15
Posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 956 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR

Peter Coors was stopped for DUI back in May and has now lost his license. Ironic?
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/13877105/

Corey


C'mon Man
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineRNOcommctr From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 830 posts, RR: 3
Reply 1, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 920 times:

As most of you know, the Coors family supports a wide variety of conservative and Republican causes. I believe Peter Coors himself has run for office in Colorado. The DUI certainly doesn't help the Coors family politically. As a Democrat, I am not particularly bothered by that.

Thank God no one was hurt.



Active loading only, ma'am, keep it moving!
User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13197 posts, RR: 15
Reply 2, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 903 times:

I think he has appeared in 'responsibilty' ads in the past for the Coors brands including anti-DUI and against under-21's drinking their product. He did try 2 years ago to run for the Republican Party nomination to run for the US Senate from Colorado.
With his money, he should have a chuffuar or pay for a car service.


User currently offlineAirCop From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 892 times:

The legal limit in Colorado is 0.05 percent.

That does seem quite low. Most states that I'm aware of the legal limit is .08. Anyone else aware of another state that is .05? (excluding the concept impairment to the slightest degree).


User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13197 posts, RR: 15
Reply 4, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 874 times:

Some states, including NY State, have a lower stage of impariment, at 0.5 with it's own penalties and the 0.8 standard with more typical penalties.

User currently offlineFumanchewd From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 853 times:

I live in a glass house.

User currently offlineSlider From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 6924 posts, RR: 34
Reply 6, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 849 times:

I hope he wasn't drinking his namesake beer.

Dude would have had to drink about two barrels of that flavored water to get drunk enough to get a DUI.


User currently offlineFumanchewd From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 847 times:

Quoting Slider (Reply 6):
I hope he wasn't drinking his namesake beer.

I have been involved with his "aviation department" (sorry, can't specify) and the only beer they put on his planes is coors. I believe it is prohibited to bring anything other beer onboard. Don't know how much he drinks though.


User currently offlineYeahitsK From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 1 day ago) and read 835 times:

I would always laugh at their commercials for Coors, where he would be walking through some snowy landscape talking about his pure beer and preaching its responsible consumption. Yet, 10 minutes later, on come the Coors light commercials which seem to be the polar opposite, emphasizing partying and hot girls (cue the twangy "and twins"). I would go so far as to suggest that the silver bullet ads are designed to appeal to a very young demographic. I don't know how Mr. Coors could take himself so seriously in his commercials.

User currently offlineBaylorAirBear From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 2913 posts, RR: 49
Reply 9, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 832 times:

Technically, it would be a DWI, no, as you have to be under 21 to be illegally under the influence?

BAB



I'm just skipping stones...
User currently offlineDL021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11447 posts, RR: 75
Reply 10, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 23 hours ago) and read 826 times:

He came clean about it and said he was guilty and did not plan properly, nor use good judgement.

I'd say we should expect some commercials where he uses this experience to show how easy it is to make this mistake. There is no good excuse for DUI/DWI and I'd like to see him make something positive from this.



Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
User currently offlineDrDeke From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 830 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 22 hours ago) and read 813 times:

Quoting AirCop (Reply 3):
That does seem quite low. Most states that I'm aware of the legal limit is .08. Anyone else aware of another state that is .05? (excluding the concept impairment to the slightest degree).

Yes, that does seem low, but as (certain) people on this board are so fond of pointing out, the law is the law and a crime is a crime. At least if you're not rich. (And sometimes, as in this case, even if you are  bouncy .)

In my opinion, it is not really possible to regulate drunk driving in an altogether "appropriate" manner. It's hard to base a judgment of "impairment" on BAC levels when the effect of a certain BAC level varies so widely from person to person, not to mention that peoples' driving abilities vary so widely when sober in the first place.

A good driver would have to drink a LOT of beer to drive as poorly as a lot of bad drivers, but there's no good way to account for that when setting a BAC limit. And even if you could, there would be ethics questions involved. For instance, if a "good driver" has an average rate of 1 collision per 28,000 miles driven and a "bad driver" has an average rate of 1 collision per 8,000 miles, where do you draw the line on impairment for the good driver? Should the good driver be allowed to drink enough to bring his collision rate down to 1/8000? Not drink at all, leaving it at 1/28000? Somewhere in between? And so on...

If I had my way, BAC limits would be raised somewhat, but it would be MUCH harder to obtain a driver's license, and people would need to pass rigorous driving tests every some-number of years in order to keep their licenses. This of course would be wildly unpopular with MADD types and the 30% or so of drivers who shouldn't really be on the road in any condition, so I don't suspect it will ever come to pass.

-DrDeke

-DrDeke



If you don't want it known, don't say it on a phone.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Self Gloss: Nighthawk Gets Another Payrise! posted Mon Nov 20 2006 15:39:14 by Nighthawk
John Edwards Gets Busted On Walmart posted Fri Nov 17 2006 14:19:53 by Texdravid
England 'Web-rage' Man Gets Prison Term posted Fri Nov 17 2006 12:58:18 by Singapore_Air
Soldier Gets Life In Prison posted Fri Nov 17 2006 03:51:14 by ANCFlyer
Ucla Student Gets Taser'ed Video...thoughts? posted Thu Nov 16 2006 07:45:43 by Mdsh00
"Borat" Gets Decked In The Face! posted Tue Nov 14 2006 19:17:58 by Mlsrar
Police Officer Gets Beaten Down By Ex Boxer posted Fri Nov 10 2006 23:52:46 by AAFLT1871
KevinL1011 Gets Annoyed With Know All Customer posted Thu Oct 26 2006 15:17:32 by Cosec59
Enron CEO-Skilling Gets 24 Years posted Mon Oct 23 2006 22:46:20 by Bushpilot
What Gets Up Your Nose About People Today? posted Fri Oct 20 2006 17:26:54 by Jetjack74