Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Welcome Back To The Cold War....  
User currently offlineBeaucaire From Syria, joined Sep 2003, 5252 posts, RR: 25
Posted (8 years 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 2331 times:

http://www.kommersant.com/page.asp?id=695422


Please respect animals - don't eat them...
7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineVHVXB From Australia, joined Apr 2006, 5524 posts, RR: 18
Reply 1, posted (8 years 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 2317 times:

Not only that the US state department has placed sanctions on Indian, Cuban, Iranian and N Korean companies as well

http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=120114


User currently offlineBaroque From Australia, joined Apr 2006, 15380 posts, RR: 59
Reply 2, posted (8 years 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 2280 times:

Just one little problem, what made you think we ever left it? Just because there was jubilation over the Berlin wall did not really mean a change of attitude by the west. It had won, so it did not need to change obviously, west was best.

USSR might have gone, but "our" side was very much in business. How do you keep our side in business, same way it had been in business for 40+ years, by ensuring there was an enemy.

It barely matters what enemy, the lack of reds under the bed just made room for more unwelcome guests/inventions.

How can you win in politics if you don't have "enemies"?


User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2243 times:

Hang on. What exactly are these "sanctions"? An embargo of US business with these companies? That seems perfectly legitimate to me. That's capitalism. If a company does something that some of its clients think is wrong, don't the clients have the option to take their business somewhere else?

The events of the past few weeks have proven that Iran poses a serious danger to the world, and in a worse-case scenario, military action against Iran may be called for. We don't want Iran to have state-of-the-art weaponry that will end up killing our own people.

If the US is threatening to arrest Sukhoi management or Russian government officials, (or bomb the Sukhoi plant) of course that would be a different story. Sukhoi operates under Russian law, and that's that. But holding back US business from Sukhoi is perfectly legitimate, and Sukhoi should have thought about the possibility of that happening before they signed the deal with Iran.


User currently offlineBeaucaire From Syria, joined Sep 2003, 5252 posts, RR: 25
Reply 4, posted (8 years 2 weeks 3 days 15 hours ago) and read 2238 times:

Sukhoi has not signed any deal with Iran that would imply any deliveries of weapons to Hezbollah. Sukhoi does not manufacture missiles but military and civil aircraft-both of which obviously can not have been delivered to any party in Lebanon.
Since the sanctions (against US companies indirectly ..) are applied just when the Lebanon -Israeli conflict erupts,the timing is obvious.
The future of multi-national technology programs looks bleak if the US plays world-police,mixing politics and industrial co-operation.
The fact that Boeing and Sukhoi -a former "enemy aircraft supplier" -try to end cold warscenarios,was a great move .US-Russian relations will get a serious damp..



Please respect animals - don't eat them...
User currently offlinePPVRA From Brazil, joined Nov 2004, 8956 posts, RR: 40
Reply 5, posted (8 years 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2231 times:

Quoting Beaucaire (Reply 4):
Sukhoi does not manufacture missiles but military and civil aircraft-both of which obviously can not have been delivered to any party in Lebanon.

They were going to upgrade bombers that are capable of delivering nukes, that's the problem. If they give up that contract, and whichever else the U.S. has a problem with, they'll probably get their civilian contracts back.

You don't make deals with companies that help your enemies!

[Edited 2006-08-05 19:49:30]


"If goods do not cross borders, soldiers will" - Frederic Bastiat
User currently offlinePar13del From Bahamas, joined Dec 2005, 7118 posts, RR: 8
Reply 6, posted (8 years 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2213 times:

So if I read the article correctly, no US Govt. Agency can do business with these companies. If that's all, whats the big deal? Most of these countries don't like to be associated with the US Govt. anyway, they may want US business but not at the expense fo being accused of being US "allies", so only private American contracts.

User currently offlineBeaucaire From Syria, joined Sep 2003, 5252 posts, RR: 25
Reply 7, posted (8 years 2 weeks 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2196 times:

"...
Rosoboronexport and Sukhoi do not have any military deals in the United States, but the both are engaged in major civilian projects. Sukhoi, for example, has U.S partners such as Hamilton Sundstrand and Honeywell to make supplies for its new SuperJet 100 regional jet. .."

Lawers of Sukhoi and Rosoboronexport are now assessing a possible impact of the sanctions on their civilian contracts.



http://www.kommersant.com/page.asp?id=695422



Please respect animals - don't eat them...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
I'm Going Back To The Nightshift(Self Gloss Alert) posted Tue Nov 14 2006 21:56:24 by LTU932
Stand Up Comedy By "Biff" From Back To The Future! posted Mon Oct 9 2006 04:13:01 by Falcon84
Trip Report: Back To The Garden? posted Wed Aug 16 2006 05:53:21 by Comorin
And The Trip Back To The Stone Ages Continues.... posted Sat Jul 30 2005 20:35:53 by TedTAce
How Reagan Won The Cold War posted Tue Feb 10 2004 21:36:04 by North County
Back To The Moon posted Fri Dec 5 2003 07:58:28 by Serge
Car In Back To The Future Part I And II posted Mon Feb 24 2003 02:11:57 by AA61hvy
Did The USA Really Win The Cold War? posted Thu Aug 22 2002 05:09:19 by Jessman
Back To The Moon And On To Mars posted Wed Jun 13 2001 03:22:25 by PanAm747
Back To The Future posted Sat Apr 28 2001 03:58:50 by LOT767-300ER