Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Red Cross Gets A Clue  
User currently offlineIainhol From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (14 years 6 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 1316 times:

WASHINGTON (AP) - The American Red Cross (news - web sites) said Wednesday it will use all the money donated to the Liberty Fund for people affected by the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, reversing a plan to set aside some of the money for other needs.

The Liberty Fund has collected $543 million. The Red Cross had planned to put about $200 million aside for use in the event of future terrorist attacks. That move drew a sharp rebuke from critics, who said the money donated to the fund was given under the assumption only people affected by the Sept. 11 attacks would get it.

``We deeply regret that our actions over the last eight weeks have not been as sharply focused as the American public wants or the victims of this tragedy deserve,'' Red Cross interim CEO Harold Decker said at a news conference.

Decker called the change a ``course correction'' and said among those eligible for the money will be survivors of the attacks and their families, those with homes damaged in the attacks and those unemployed because their workplaces are in lower Manhattan.

He said $275 million would be paid out by the end of this year. Grants to families, which had been restricted to just three months of living expenses, will be extended to one year.

About 9 percent of the total fund will pay overhead and administrative costs for distributing the money. Decker said it could take many years before all the money is spent.

The Red Cross has stopped accepting donations to the fund, saying the amount collected so far is sufficient. The charity already has distributed about $121 million in direct aid to Sept. 11 victims and their families.

Red Cross President Bernadine Healy is stepping down as head of the charity at the end of the year in part because of criticism of the fund. Healy took the unusual step of setting up the fund as a separate account to deal with the attacks, over the objections of some Red Cross board members.

Healy was lambasted at a House hearing on charitable contributions last week after two widows who lost their husbands in the World Trade Center attack described how they have had to fight a maze of bureaucracy to obtain financial help.

Lawmakers from both parties said they believed donors to the Liberty Fund contributed as generously as they did because they thought their money would be channeled quickly and directly to the victims and families of the attacks.

Since Sept. 11, about 2,500 families have received Liberty Fund benefits, averaging about $25,000 per household. On Monday, the Red Cross said it would return donations to any contributor who requests a refund.

The 37,000-employee American Red Cross administers almost half the nation's blood supply and provides relief to victims of disasters.

Although I still do not think highly or trust the red cross, but atleast the right thing has happened this time. I am 100% sure it was solely because of the pressure, and persisitance of people like myself and KROC, and other people who bellieve the Red Cross should be honest.

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlinePilot1113 From United States of America, joined Aug 1999, 2333 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (14 years 6 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 1306 times:

I'm sure the ARC was very reluctant to go this route, seeing it took them 8 weeks. It just goes to show that with a little persisitance anything is possible!  Big thumbs up

I wonder what Bill O'Reilly has to say tonight about this?

- Neil Harrison

User currently offlineCtbarnes From United States of America, joined Mar 2000, 3491 posts, RR: 47
Reply 2, posted (14 years 6 months 3 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 1301 times:

Something caustic, no doubt.

Charles, SJ

The customer isn't a moron, she is your wife -David Ogilvy
User currently offlineKROC From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (14 years 6 months 3 weeks 16 hours ago) and read 1291 times:

Ianhol. Thanks for posting this. I read the article at work, but the LAN network would not let me on to post it. I love the title...

User currently offlineIainhol From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (14 years 6 months 3 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 1274 times:

^^ no probs!

User currently offlineStretch 8 From United States of America, joined May 1999, 2568 posts, RR: 15
Reply 5, posted (14 years 6 months 3 weeks 2 hours ago) and read 1268 times:

They are doing the right thing. Now what about the excess blood they have to destroy? I share Iain and KROC's concerns about this organization.

Maggs swings, it's a drive deep to left! The Tigers are going to the World Series!!!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Israeli Red Cross Ambulance Incident A Hoax? posted Tue Aug 29 2006 18:22:14 by Clickhappy
Lebanon - Red Cross, Not Red Crescent posted Sun Jul 16 2006 04:20:58 by AeroWesty
Red Cross Lifeguard Challenge, Anyone Taken It? posted Wed May 31 2006 05:55:03 by KingAir200
Farrakhan, Criticizes White People, Red Cross, ETC posted Thu Sep 15 2005 04:44:32 by MidnightMike
LA DHS Denied Dome Access To Red Cross posted Thu Sep 8 2005 00:32:24 by DL021
Why Did The Red Cross Visit Saddam? posted Mon Feb 23 2004 19:43:55 by Lehpron
The Red Cross Rejected My Blood. posted Thu Dec 11 2003 21:02:02 by LHMark
Muslim Terrorists Blow Up Red Cross posted Mon Oct 27 2003 12:49:43 by Galaxy5
Red Cross Visits Captives In Cuba posted Sat Jan 19 2002 02:47:48 by Galilee
More Trouble For Red Cross posted Sun Nov 11 2001 20:36:23 by Stretch 8