Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
New Television Low: Survivor Cook Islands  
User currently offline102IAHexpress From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 1156 posts, RR: 3
Posted (8 years 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 1529 times:

Survivor: Cook Islands’ to divide teams by race

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/14484194/

20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDerico From Argentina, joined Dec 1999, 4304 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (8 years 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 1521 times:

Interesting, I'm sure the 'hispanic' race will be so easily recognizable since I'm sure they all look totally alike, since as we all know speaking the same language makes a hispanic of african descent share the same genetic background as a hispanic of indian and european descent.. talk about absolute ignorance, my my.


My internet was not shut down, the internet has shut me down
User currently offlineRen41 From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 1524 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (8 years 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 1515 times:

That show went down the shit hole years back, but this could be funny. Unlike most Americans, I have a sense of humor about this stuff, but this idea will be killed by the PC Police.

Anytime the black team loses Al Sharpton will be all over CBS for giving the whites an advantage.  Wink

It will be funny to see America's reaction.

R41

[Edited 2006-08-23 23:14:11]

User currently offlinePadraighaz From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 1502 times:

Quoting 102IAHexpress (Thread starter):
Survivor: Cook Islands’ to divide teams by race

Proxy race wars to entertain white trash viewers.

It might even distract some from FOX for a short while. Cool!

Padraig Houlahan


User currently offlineAerobalance From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 4681 posts, RR: 47
Reply 4, posted (8 years 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 1492 times:

Whatever it takes to get people to watch...


"Sing a song, play guitar, make it snappy..."
User currently offlineDAL767400ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 1480 times:

This sounds like a sketch that Dave Chappelle would do  Wink .

User currently offlineAerobalance From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 4681 posts, RR: 47
Reply 6, posted (8 years 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 1476 times:

Quoting DAL767400ER (Reply 5):
Dave Chappelle

Who's he?



"Sing a song, play guitar, make it snappy..."
User currently offlineNeilYYZ From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (8 years 1 week 3 hours ago) and read 1463 times:

Personally, I find that Survivor hit a new low unto itself when it first came out all those years ago. But heck, leave it to the morons who created a crap show years ago to make it even worse now... And just for the record, no, I still won't watch an episode.

User currently offlineDAL767400ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (8 years 1 week 3 hours ago) and read 1442 times:

Quoting Aerobalance (Reply 6):
Who's he?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Chappelle
Chappelle's Show
"I'm Rick James, B!tch"


User currently offlineSQuared From Canada, joined May 2005, 387 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (8 years 1 week 3 hours ago) and read 1434 times:

Reality TV has generally appealed to the lowest common denominator. But this is as low as you could go.

Normally I would suggest people to boycott the show... but I think that won't be necessary. I mean, who watches that show anymore? It's become so formulaic that the only way they could pique our interest was to introduce a controversial element to the show.

What's next, a 'gay' tribe and a 'straight' tribe? An 'able bodied' tribe vs. a 'disabled' tribe? I should probably shut up before they get anymore ideas...

SQuared


User currently offlineDL021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11447 posts, RR: 75
Reply 10, posted (8 years 1 week 2 hours ago) and read 1419 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting DAL767400ER (Reply 8):
Quoting Aerobalance (Reply 6):
Who's he?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dave_Chappelle
Chappelle's Show
"I'm Rick James, B!tch"

I think he was simply giving someone an opportunity to hit a homer.....



Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13078 posts, RR: 12
Reply 11, posted (8 years 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 1364 times:

I don't watch these shows as they are so stupid, silly and usually show the worst in human beheavor. I don't find them entertaining, I would rather watch something on the History, Discovery or other non-broadcast channels.
Black leaders and activists are already bashing CBS network for this 'Survivor' team division. I am surprised that the non-white contestants allowed them to be divided this way, but when money is on the line that can make people shut up quick.
I would suspect that Sharpton and other activists in the Black, Hispanic and Asian communities in the USA are already contacting the expected advertisers of this show to ask them to pull thier ads and local stations to not show this show.


User currently offlineSpringbok747 From Australia, joined Nov 2004, 4387 posts, RR: 10
Reply 12, posted (8 years 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 1355 times:

Quoting 102IAHexpress (Thread starter):
New Television Low: Survivor Cook Islands

Ah...interesting, but have you seen the Aussie version of Survivor? Its called 'Celebrity Survivor'. Now that's a new television low.



אני תומך בישראל
User currently offlineSTLGph From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 9340 posts, RR: 25
Reply 13, posted (8 years 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 1349 times:

Quoting SQuared (Reply 9):
I mean, who watches that show anymore?

17 million people on average per episode. yes, it's down almost 11 million from when it first began, but after 13 seasons, those numbers are astronomical.

the show is a cash cow for the network and for the affiliates based on production costs versus income and revenue. there could be as a little as 2 million people watching per episode and the show would still be raking in the profits.



Eternal darkness we all should dread. It's hard to party when you're dead.
User currently offlineDL021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11447 posts, RR: 75
Reply 14, posted (8 years 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1291 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I saw an episode of 5 for Dinner with Roger Corman as a guest (along with Rob Zombie and BRUCE! campbell for you philistines) and he explained the low budget process using two slanted lines as an air graphic chart.

One line is the cost of making the show....it goes upwards from left to right.

the next line is the income derived from showing the show....it goes down or up from left to right.

At some point in the life if a television series or movie (and it's sequels) you have the first line moving downwards (inevitable) and the production cost line invariably moves up if for no other reason that inflation and the talent demanding more of the pie.

When the lines cross you stop making the show....until then you make it because that's money in the bank.



Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
User currently offlineSQuared From Canada, joined May 2005, 387 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (8 years 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 1276 times:

Quoting STLGph (Reply 13):
17 million people on average per episode. yes, it's down almost 11 million from when it first began, but after 13 seasons, those numbers are astronomical.

It is still surprisingly high. But trends show that viewers are leaving quickly. The past two seasons have shown a 25% drop in viewers alone. It is really a desperate ploy to entice viewers. Producers are clearly hoping that this variation of Survivor becomes America's dirty pleasure.

Quoting STLGph (Reply 13):
the show is a cash cow for the network and for the affiliates based on production costs versus income and revenue. there could be as a little as 2 million people watching per episode and the show would still be raking in the profits.

While it may be profitable, losing more and more viewers will force it off the lucrative Thursday night schedule. All these gimmicky things won't keep that from happening.

SQuared


User currently offlineGilligan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (8 years 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 1242 times:

Last dying gasp of a fading show. They were all freaks from the beginning. A shame too since the producer Mark Burnett started off so many years ago with a really great survivor show, the Ecochallenge Race. Does that even still exist? I haven't seen it on the Discovery Channel for a long time. I thought that was some really great programming. About the only reality show that comes even close to that is the Amazing Race and they take pains to screw that one up by finding at least 3 sets of freaks for every season.

User currently offlineMaverickM11 From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 17442 posts, RR: 46
Reply 17, posted (8 years 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1212 times:

Quoting SQuared (Reply 9):
But this is as low as you could go.

Apparently you haven't seen "Flava Of Love" then  Silly



E pur si muove -Galileo
User currently offlineAeroWesty From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 20540 posts, RR: 62
Reply 18, posted (8 years 6 days 1 hour ago) and read 1197 times:

So last season the show divided contestants into groups of older men, younger men, older women and younger women. So was age discrimination just happy talk television? Just to play devil's advocate for a moment, was that better? Is this worse?


International Homo of Mystery
User currently offlineSQuared From Canada, joined May 2005, 387 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (8 years 6 days ago) and read 1185 times:

Quoting AeroWesty (Reply 18):
So last season the show divided contestants into groups of older men, younger men, older women and younger women. So was age discrimination just happy talk television? Just to play devil's advocate for a moment, was that better? Is this worse?

As I didn't watch Survivor last year (or the years before that), I wasn't aware that they divided the tribes based on age and gender. This year however the media has picked up the racial element of the new Survivor. And of course the reason the media has picked up the story is because it sees racism as a much more polarizing issue. It's certainly much more sensationalistic than 'age discrimination', and frankly many people care more about racism than ageism.

It's an unfortunate reflection on society, but ageism is not nearly as taboo as racism. While many people are offended at being labelled a 'racist', virtually no one is labelled an 'ageist' for teasing senior citizens (and even if they were labelled as such, the label has no or little emotional meaning). In society's eyes, ageism barely registers on the mind-- but racial matters sends emotions off the charts.

SQuared


User currently offlineDeltaGator From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 6341 posts, RR: 13
Reply 20, posted (8 years 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 1164 times:

I think it will be quite amusing though I gave up on reality shows after the second season. What will be interesting to see is the attitudes within each team when they are beat by another team as well as the attitudes towards the other teams. Bigotry and racism exists across all races so don't expect the white folks to be the only ones throwing out some dumb stereotypes in this show.

Quoting MaverickM11 (Reply 17):
"Flava Of Love"

A microcosm of everything that is wrong with the USA.

Quoting Padraighaz (Reply 3):
Proxy race wars to entertain white trash viewers.

It might even distract some from FOX for a short while. Cool!

Right...because blacks, asians, and hispanics are completely free of racial bigotry. Do you really think we are that dumb and naive?



"If you can't delight in the misery of others then you don't deserve to be a college football fan."
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Honeymoon: Fiji Or Cook Islands? posted Fri Apr 7 2006 06:18:39 by SonicZoom87
College WS: USC Finds New Team Low posted Sun Jun 12 2005 08:45:54 by S12PPL
New Zealand: Low Middle Income Country posted Fri Jan 14 2005 02:47:25 by Qantasclub
Westboro Baptist Stoops To A New Low posted Thu Nov 23 2006 00:48:39 by BHMBAGLOCK
New Low For Rush Limbaugh posted Tue Oct 24 2006 23:34:25 by AirCop
Campaign Scare Tactics Stoop To A New Low posted Mon Oct 23 2006 04:15:15 by Cba
New Dane Cook HBO Special Airs Tonight posted Tue Sep 5 2006 01:22:42 by Corey07850
New Low Income $500K Housing! posted Mon Aug 14 2006 19:56:56 by Dc10s4ever
Inter Fans Hit New Low! posted Sun Apr 9 2006 19:34:20 by Alias1024
US - India Relations Reach New Low Over Visa Issue posted Sat Mar 19 2005 16:10:51 by B747-437B
College WS: USC Finds New Team Low posted Sun Jun 12 2005 08:45:54 by S12PPL
New Zealand: Low Middle Income Country posted Fri Jan 14 2005 02:47:25 by Qantasclub
Sampras - Agassi Rivalry Reaches "new Low" posted Sun Mar 14 2010 20:34:57 by Elite
Obama Presidential Coin - New Or Just Another Low posted Mon Dec 15 2008 17:16:08 by Cptkrell
Did China Hit A New Low Here? posted Tue Aug 12 2008 11:36:20 by Phoenix9
A New Low For Speed Enforcement In America posted Fri Oct 26 2007 20:54:50 by Lobster
Bush's Approval At New Low In Reuters: 24 Percent posted Thu Oct 18 2007 08:56:43 by B752fanatic
Westboro Baptist Stoops To A New Low posted Thu Nov 23 2006 00:48:39 by BHMBAGLOCK
New Low For Rush Limbaugh posted Tue Oct 24 2006 23:34:25 by AirCop