AerospaceFan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Posted (8 years 4 hours ago) and read 1286 times:
Two men in Steamboat Springs, Colorado were sentenced to serve six months in jail and pay restitution of $15.00 for climbing a store fence and taking over-ripe food from a garbage area, according to a story in The Steamboat Pilot & Today. The sentence arose from a plea agreement through which a felony charge was apparently dropped.
According to one of owners of the store where the acts took place, the prosecutor in the case told him that he wanted to make an example out of the two. However, the owner said he considers the result excessive and "ridiculous", the story said.
Greasespot From Canada, joined Apr 2004, 3079 posts, RR: 20
Reply 1, posted (8 years 4 hours ago) and read 1282 times:
Ahhh a good use of the American Penal system......Lets toss jaywalkers away for life.....I mean everyone knows that stealing food garbage is a gateway to jaywalking which is them a gateway to serial killing...
Sometimes all you can do is look them in the eye and ask " how much did your mom drink when she was pregnant with you?"
AerospaceFan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 4 hours ago) and read 1275 times:
I think that, unless there were priors, six months for hopping a fence and taking garbage seems a bit much. Probation and a fine, maybe, but six months?
According to the story, prosecutor explained the basis for the sentence as follows:
Quote: “They had a choice between accepting a deferred felony with 90 days in jail or a misdemeanor conviction with six months in jail,” St. James said Friday. “It came down to whether they wanted a felony conviction with less jail time or a misdemeanor with more jail.”
The story continued,
Quote: St. James also asked Judge James Garrecht to fine the men $42 for each day they serve in jail, the standard cost of care for inmates. Garrecht refused.
If the judge had granted the last request, and assuming a 180-day sentence, each man would have been liable for $7,560.00 for the cost of care.
AirCop From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (8 years 1 hour ago) and read 1140 times:
Just wondering how much problems as the "Rainbow Family of Living Life" as caused the community of Steamboat Springs. They stayed in the forest of Northern Arizona a few years ago and left it in a mess, and then you have the problems they caused for local law enforcement. It should be noted the United States Forest Service has ruled all Rainbow Family gathering on forest service land as illegal. (www.welcomehome.org/rainbow.html). This reaction by the prosecutor might be a message to the family not to return.
Itsjustme From United States of America, joined Apr 2004, 2768 posts, RR: 9
Reply 8, posted (8 years ago) and read 1120 times:
Quoting AirCop (Reply 7): Just wondering how much problems as the "Rainbow Family of Living Life" as caused the community of Steamboat Springs.
Quoting AirCop (Reply 7): This reaction by the prosecutor might be a message to the family not to return.
I'm not familiar with the "Rainbow Family" but they remind me of a large number of "Deadheads" that were bothersome for residents and cops in MI. A small, quaint suburban Detroit town was also the home of an outdoor Amphitheatre where The Greatful Dead would appear from time to time. The Deadheads would literally take over the town, camping out on street corners, in store doorways, parks and even in the median of I-75. The majority of these "people" were unkept, dirty, and just plain nasty in appearance (not to mention quite a few were found to have outstanding warrants) and would leave a trail of trash and litter wherever they chose to camp out. The property crime rate would escalate whenever The Grateful Dead appeared and it didn't take a rocket scientist to come to the conclusion that the Dead Heads were responsible for the increase in crime. Cost to the taxpayers for stepped up police patrols was substantial. For that reason, the cops would make arrests and judges would impose stiff fines and jail sentences for crimes that may, under other circumstances, be handled differently. By no means were charges fabricated. Cops would just become more aggressive when enforcing the local ordinances for littering, loitering, trespassing, and the like.