Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Army CoS Blows Off Rumsfeld Budget  
User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 1166 times:

Well, seems as though Rumsfeld's handpicked Chief of Staff, Army, Gen Peter Schoomaker, blew off the August 15th deadline for 2008 Budget submission to Rummy.

Seems Rumsfeld - still trying to do things on the cheap - gave a dollar amount to Schoomaker and told him to develop the FY'08 budget. Seems Schoomaker - doing his job as he should be - is telling Rumsfeld that it's impossible.

Finally -  praise  - someone at the Pentagon has their head out of rectal defilade. Someone - this time a very senior someone - is telling the SecDef he and his demi-Gods on A-Ring cannot continue to press the military (in this case, the Army) in it's current fashion and not fund the troops and equipement . . .

A committee was set up to "discuss" the Army shortfall . . . it agreed with Schoomaker's assessment. Rumsfeld likely set up said committee to discredit Schoomaker - he's known to do that shit.

Well done Gen Schoomaker.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationwo...20.story?track=mostviewed-homepage




http://www.army.mil/leaders/csa/bio.htm

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineHalls120 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1141 times:

Quoting ANCFlyer (Thread starter):
Finally - - someone at the Pentagon has their head out of rectal defilade. Someone - this time a very senior someone - is telling the SecDef he and his demi-Gods on A-Ring cannot continue to press the military (in this case, the Army) in it's current fashion and not fund the troops and equipement . . .

A committee was set up to "discuss" the Army shortfall . . . it agreed with Schoomaker's assessment. Rumsfeld likely set up said committee to discredit Schoomaker - he's known to do that shit.

Well done Gen Schoomaker.

Concur completely.

Rumsfeld is on the way out. Even if he makes to January 2009, he's losing his iron grip on the Pentagon. The CoS response illustrates this.


User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1135 times:

In all my years service I've never witnessed General/Flag officers this outspoken in these numbers.

General Officers that once worked with each other, Paul Vallely and Batiste to name a few, in the 1st Cav Division, are on opposite sides of this fence. While that is not unnecessarily amazing, what does bear attention is the simple fact that General Officers (retired, or otherwise) are even breaching the peace in this fashion.

Since Vietnam was before my time, perhaps Slammer could address whether this occured during McNamara's time. It is, however, unprecidented in today's modern military.

That ought to speak volumes - along with the perpetual strategic failings in Iraq - as to Rumsfelds grasp of the Operational Art; more correctly, his lack of a grasp of the Operational Art. Rumfeld is a danger to the DoD and to the men and women that perform vailiantly every day in the face of what can only be described as 'lousy leadership' at Sodom on the Potomac.

Shameful.


User currently offlineAirCop From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1129 times:

Quoting ANCFlyer (Thread starter):

Well done Gen Schoomaker.



Quoting Halls120 (Reply 1):
Concur completely.

Rumsfeld was reportably on his way out prior to 9/11 according to articles that I read in the Washington Post during that time period. The President needs to fire him NOW in order to bring order to the operational aspects of Iraq. Quite frankly the men and women that serve (and let me add that ever served) in the military deserve better than Rumsfeld.


User currently offlineComorin From United States of America, joined May 2005, 4895 posts, RR: 16
Reply 4, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1122 times:

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 2):
In all my years service I've never witnessed General/Flag officers this outspoken in these numbers.

Is there a difference between Generals and Flag Officers, or or you using the term to include Admirals etc.

Just curious, and thanks.


User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1120 times:

Quoting Comorin (Reply 4):
Is there a difference between Generals and Flag Officers, or or you using the term to include Admirals etc.

 checkmark 

Flag Officers for the seafarers (USN, USCG) and Generals for the regular folk (USA, USMC, Scare Farce).


User currently offlineDL021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11446 posts, RR: 76
Reply 6, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 1114 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

OK...I'm of the opinion that regardless of why Rumsfeld has lost the support of a significant percentage of his officers he needs to be replaced. I told this to ANC last year, but this is getting out of control.

We need to bring in someone who holds the respect of the officers, is tough enough to push the honest view both ways, and will lead by example rather than fiat. Rumsfeld is an efficient administrator, and a former Marine flyer, but he doesn't manage or deliver the message effectively and has left himself open to far too much criticism.

Schoomaker was a Rumsfeld appointee and everyone knew that he was beyond any form of intimidation (not only was he retired and came back for duty's sake but he's one of the few real operators to make it to such high rank...he didn't just serve a tour as an A-team leader...he was an original Delta guy and led the organization twice). Rumsfeld appointed him because he's tough and going to tell the truth. What he has failed to do is coordinate with the man on some things and appears to have fallen into a McNamara trap. He's placing his group of technicians over the soldiers too far.



Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
User currently offline174thfwff From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 14 hours ago) and read 1105 times:

What's good for the Army is that Gen. Schoomaker was asked to come back out of retirement.. So he's obviously in a position where he dosen't need to please anybody but himself.

User currently offlineComorin From United States of America, joined May 2005, 4895 posts, RR: 16
Reply 8, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 1071 times:

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 5):
Flag Officers for the seafarers (USN, USCG) and Generals for the regular folk (USA, USMC, Scare Farce).

Thanks again for explaining!

So Flag Officers/GOs in Commonwealth (UK etc) Services:

AF: Air Commodore, Air Vice Marshal, Air Marshal, Air Chief Marshal
Navy: Same - Commodore, Rear Admiral, Vice Admiral, Admiral, Admiral of the Fleet.
Army: add Brigadier (*) and Field Marshal (*****).


User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1065 times:

Quoting DL021 (Reply 6):
and a former Marine flyer

Navy Reserve

Quoting 174thfwff (Reply 7):
What's good for the Army is that Gen. Schoomaker was asked to come back out of retirement..

What is most damning here is that he was personally hand selected by Rumsfeld . . . when a member of your hand picked team raises the bullshit flag you know there's a problem. A problem that can't be glossed over with Washington rhetoric or double speak . . .

There is no question but that Schoomaker is an exceptionally qualified, no bullshit soldier . . . his credentials speak for themselves. I just don't think Rumsfeld counted on the Schoomaker unfailingly doing his job (ultimately - taking care of soldiers) rather than towing the Rummy Party Line.


User currently offlineAndesSMF From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1063 times:

Quoting ANCFlyer (Thread starter):
still trying to do things on the cheap

I have heard you say this before, but never quite explained. Can you give me a quick explanation as to what this means.

Thanks.


User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1055 times:

Quoting AndesSMF (Reply 10):
I have heard you say this before, but never quite explained. Can you give me a quick explanation as to what this means.

A quick explanation might do the explanation some injustice - but here goes:

When it was decided to invade Iraq Rumsfeld directed that it be done with as few number of troops and as little equipment as possible. Essentially, the initial plan called for only two Divisions.

That in and of itself is tactically and strategically wrong - as wrong as you can be - in every sense and by every ounce of training. You don't go on the offensive planning to be outnumbered. That is simply wrong. He overruled Gen Tommy Franks, the field commander at the time, on troop strength and equipment needs.

There was no plan to move necessary equipment to the region rather than a decision by Rumsfeld to rely solely on pre-po (pre-positioned equipment) already in Kuwait - insufficient quantity to do the job.

He did not allow a followon plan. He insisted we'd only be in the area a few months.


Here's a couple links for you:

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/030407fa_fact1

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/2899823.stm


User currently offlineUH60FtRucker From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1049 times:

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 11):

Hey - don't forget that they repeatedly keep shooting down the Warrant Officer Pay Matching.

Warrants make FAR less than their commissioned brethren as one's time-in-service progresses, but we are increasingly being expected to assume "staff and command" positions within the units. We're doing the jobs of officers, but getting just a little over senior non-coms pay rates.

And everytime the program to bring warrant pay closer to commission pay comes up for review?    BOOOOM! They fucking blow it up like a southern boy strappin' an M80 to the back of a bullfrog.

And of course warrants are far to professional to say "Well I'm doing an officers job without officer pay... so fuck it... I'll just do this half ass." Of course not. We just enjoy getting royally ass fucked.

Kinda like the navy when they go on pass or leave.  

-UH60

[Edited 2006-09-27 01:51:43]

User currently offlineAndesSMF From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 1047 times:

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 11):



Quoting UH60FtRucker (Reply 12):

Thank you for your insights.


User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 1003 times:

It appears as though Gen Schoomaker made a point with this action . . .

Update: The Army asked for and recieved $17.1 Bil for equipment reset (Reset = Replacment of Combat Lost equipment). As well as everything else Gen Schoomaker asked for. Congress approved Gen Schoomaker's budget, not Rummy's.

The tradeoff . . . troops will get only 2.2% pay raise beginning in Jan 07, rather than a 2.7% (I hope that spins PacificJourney right up  devil  ). That means retirees (me for one) will also get a 2.2% raise in Jan. That's the least amount if increase in 12 years.

I think it's a fair trade . . . obviously the equipment has to be replaced. Eighteen Apaches, Seventeen Blackhawks, a dozen Chinooks, a Battalion's worth of M1A1s and a Battalion's worth of Strykers. New Hummers as well - uparmored models, not the fiberglass bullshit ones . . .

That's one thing the Congress has gotten right this year.

Source: Army Times, 9 Oct 06.

A link would be useless, you have to subscribe (and pay) to read the article.


User currently offlineDL021 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 11446 posts, RR: 76
Reply 15, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 977 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 9):
Quoting DL021 (Reply 6):
and a former Marine flyer

Navy Reserve

thanks for the correction...I was mistaken. He was a Naval Aviator...got that right.

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 9):
What is most damning here is that he was personally hand selected by Rumsfeld

He was the fourth or fifth guy they offered the job to, and he was personally recruited by a couple of generals who pulled at his sense of duty.

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 14):
The tradeoff . . . troops will get only 2.2% pay raise beginning in Jan 07, rather than a 2.7% (I hope that spins PacificJourney right up ). That means retirees (me for one) will also get a 2.2% raise in Jan. That's the least amount if increase in 12 years.

I think it's a fair trade

I'd agree with you, I just hope that family benefits aren't going to suffer because of this.



Is my Pan Am ticket to the moon still good?
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Palestinian Grandmother Blows Herself Up posted Fri Nov 24 2006 03:13:13 by RJpieces
Proposal To Balance The Budget posted Tue Nov 14 2006 01:23:19 by Cba
The Rumsfeld We Never Saw - Video posted Sat Nov 11 2006 03:06:17 by AsstChiefMark
Rumsfeld To Be Charged With War Crimes posted Fri Nov 10 2006 20:16:20 by ArtieFufkin
Companies That Start Off Millions In Debt posted Fri Nov 10 2006 07:15:13 by B737-112
CNN Reporting Donald Rumsfeld Is Stepping Down! posted Wed Nov 8 2006 18:53:01 by Charger
Military Times Calls For Rumsfeld's Resignation posted Sat Nov 4 2006 02:21:01 by Rsmith6621a
Report: Author Hersh Says Army "Most Murderous" posted Thu Nov 2 2006 15:07:08 by AerospaceFan
Is Muqtada Al-Sadr Off Limits To The USA posted Thu Nov 2 2006 06:08:28 by Rsmith6621a
How To Get Oil Off A Car Window posted Fri Oct 27 2006 20:51:43 by KLM672