Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Bush Trying To Pardon Self For War Crimes..sick  
User currently offlineMdsh00 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 4128 posts, RR: 8
Posted (8 years 2 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2583 times:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MoRjbIQMXGQ

This is just unbelieveable. This administration doesn't give a shit about anything. I would really like to see the Bush apologists defend this one.

I know what they will do, attempt to attack and discredit the source.


"Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a big fat white guy who is threatened by change."
15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13170 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (8 years 2 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2555 times:

In effect he is with the recent bill, at least as to certain war crimes before December 2005 (torture of criminals). I wouldn't be surprised that he does pre-empeted pardons of V.P. Chenny, Sec.Def. Rumsfeld, CIA persons to try to insulate them from war crimes. I believe if any of them try to travel to certain countries after they leave office, they will face substantual risk of being arrested for war crimes to face an international tribunal over their 'War on Terror' abuses.

User currently offlineBobster2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 2 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2542 times:

I don't believe that Congress can make retroactive laws. So if they do this, it's unconstitutional. Only the president can grant pardons.

If Bush wants a pardon, he'll just have to wait for Hillary to give him one. Big grin


User currently offlineAirCop From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (8 years 2 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2532 times:

Quoting Bobster2 (Reply 2):
I don't believe that Congress can make retroactive laws.

Maybe I'm wrong but I thought Congress did this all the time, example the tax code.

What I don't appreciate is what he did the other day, and tell the President of Aghanistian, that the United States will stand by for another five years. So far he dumped the Iraq war and now this onto the lap of the next President.


User currently offlineAsstChiefMark From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (8 years 2 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2516 times:

Bush will go down in history about one notch above Nixon. I think I said that here over a year ago.

Mark


User currently offlineGo3Team From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3267 posts, RR: 16
Reply 5, posted (8 years 2 months 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 2509 times:

Quoting AirCop (Reply 3):
Maybe I'm wrong but I thought Congress did this all the time, example the tax code.

Tax Increase a la Clinton, but thats the only one I know about. Then there were the $3xx rebate checks...



Yay Pudding!
User currently offlineBobster2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (8 years 2 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2493 times:

Quoting AirCop (Reply 3):
Maybe I'm wrong but I thought Congress did this all the time, example the tax code.

You're right, but the tax code is civil law. Criminal laws cannot be retroactive.

[Edited 2006-09-30 00:57:23]

User currently offlineTedTAce From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (8 years 2 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2453 times:

Quoting AsstChiefMark (Reply 4):
about one notch above Nixon.

So Much Credit?

Nixon's lies hurt campaigns, parties, and people, but IIRC no one died as a result of Nixon's Watergate actions.

If there is going to be an American history beyond the next 100 years, I garantee Bush will go down as the greatest failure of the American Presidency ever.


User currently offlineAsstChiefMark From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (8 years 2 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2443 times:

Quoting TedTAce (Reply 7):
I garantee Bush will go down as the greatest failure of the American Presidency ever.

The scary part is that he's absolutely convinced that he's doing everything right. Remember during the campaign debates a couple years ago when he couldn't think of any mistakes he'd made?

I'm sort of intrigued how he can be incredibly arrogant and embarrassingly naive at the same time.  scratchchin 

Mark


User currently offlineCptkrell From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 3220 posts, RR: 12
Reply 9, posted (8 years 2 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2434 times:

Doesn't one have to be CONVICTED of something before a pardon can even be considered?

Anyway, I clicked on the link and it was taking too long to download. I noticed Cafferty's name on it and surmised I saved time by not even waiting to read it. Regards..jack



all best; jack
User currently offlineDeltaGator From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 6341 posts, RR: 13
Reply 10, posted (8 years 2 months 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2434 times:

Quoting LTBEWR (Reply 1):
I wouldn't be surprised that he does pre-empeted pardons of V.P. Chenny, Sec.Def. Rumsfeld, CIA persons to try to insulate them from war crimes

How exactly can you pre-emptively pardon someone if they haven't been convicted of anything? You can't.

Quoting Mdsh00 (Thread starter):
I know what they will do, attempt to attack and discredit the source.

Cafferty loses credibility as an objective source when he calls folks stooges. If he wants to present himself as a journalist then he shouldn't resort to name calling otherwise he falls into the same category as O'Reily, Olberman, Hannity, and Stuart Smalley as commentators. This view is neither an attack or an attempt to discredit Cafferty but to point out he is not neutral in his opinion.

As for attacking and discrediting...it's not exclusive to the GOP or the Dubya administration. Clinton's crowd was also quite good at it. It occurs on both sides of the aisle. It always has and always will and that doesn't make it right.

All that said, I am amazed at how bold the Bush administration is today with things. I personally couldn't give two shits if they torture some Al Quaida clown down at Gitmo. Hell, bring them straight to the White House lawn and water board their ass.

I disagree that they should be treated in accordance with the Geneva Convention but when a court ruling doesn't go your way and you try to bury this piece down into a bill that is going to pass that is pretty low.

Again, both sides of the aisle do it but never have the stakes been this high that I can remember. Also, if you're going to make it retroactive then make it back to some nebulous date in the early 1900s but not the exact date that our world changed and the war against these Islamic goons began. It's just a bit obvious.



"If you can't delight in the misery of others then you don't deserve to be a college football fan."
User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21804 posts, RR: 55
Reply 11, posted (8 years 2 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2404 times:

Quoting Bobster2 (Reply 2):
I don't believe that Congress can make retroactive laws.

One can't be charged with crimes that weren't crimes when you did them. But can one be cleared of crimes that were crimes when you did them but aren't anymore?

Quoting DeltaGator (Reply 10):
I disagree that they should be treated in accordance with the Geneva Convention but when a court ruling doesn't go your way and you try to bury this piece down into a bill that is going to pass that is pretty low.

 checkmark  I hope that the Supreme Court will strike that section down (or at least the retroactive part of it). Hell, I'd even be in favor of the Democrats fillibustering the bill unless that section is taken out. The president is not above the law.

By the way, does anyone have a link to the actual text in the bill? I've tried the House website, but it's down for some reason.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineGilligan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (8 years 2 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2395 times:

Quoting Cptkrell (Reply 9):
Doesn't one have to be CONVICTED of something before a pardon can even be considered?



Quoting DeltaGator (Reply 10):
How exactly can you pre-emptively pardon someone if they haven't been convicted of anything? You can't.

You'll have to ask fmr President Ford that then. He pardoned President Nixon in Setember '74 and President Nixon had not been convicted of anything.

http://www.chron.com/content/interactive/special/watergate/pardon.html


User currently offlineMdsh00 From United States of America, joined May 2004, 4128 posts, RR: 8
Reply 13, posted (8 years 2 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2390 times:

Quoting Cptkrell (Reply 9):
Anyway, I clicked on the link and it was taking too long to download. I noticed Cafferty's name on it and surmised I saved time by not even waiting to read it. Regards..jack

Fine, if you leave out his commentary. What about the facts? Why is he trying to retroactively pardon himself if, by what he says, that the administration has done nothing wrong?



"Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a big fat white guy who is threatened by change."
User currently offlineBobster2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (8 years 2 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2369 times:

Quoting Mir (Reply 11):
But can one be cleared of crimes that were crimes when you did them but aren't anymore?

No, not usually. The prohibition of ex post facto law means Congress can neither criminalize nor decriminalize something retroactively. So it works both ways.

But it appears to be a bit complicated, so I'd better leave this to the lawyers.  Smile

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_post_facto_law


User currently offlineFlyingTexan From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (8 years 2 months 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 2350 times:

Quoting AsstChiefMark (Reply 4):
Bush will go down in history about one notch above Nixon.

Try a few notches below Nixon.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Rumsfeld To Be Charged With War Crimes posted Fri Nov 10 2006 20:16:20 by ArtieFufkin
Bush Looks To Cut Budget For FAA/ATC posted Fri Sep 17 2004 08:21:52 by Nasmal
Trying To Help Understand The War posted Thu Mar 20 2003 21:15:21 by Galaxy5
First Briton Ever To Admit To War Crimes posted Tue Sep 19 2006 19:27:55 by 9V
Handy Site For Those Trying To Find Open FM Freqs posted Thu Aug 24 2006 01:40:00 by B737-112
Accusation Of War Crimes In Iraq Sticks To US. posted Tue Mar 21 2006 17:50:05 by Sabenapilot
Trying To Locate Eagles Jersey For 5 Year Old posted Fri Oct 21 2005 23:39:20 by Tom in NO
Bush To Scrap Subsidy For Amtrak! (Hooray!) posted Wed Feb 2 2005 03:19:45 by JCS17
The Guardian: Blair Must Check Bush's March To War posted Thu Jan 30 2003 05:29:21 by PHX-LJU
Bush To Give A 'Go' For Mars? posted Sat Jan 18 2003 19:57:36 by GDB