Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Kim Jong Ill Regrets Nuclear Tests  
User currently offlineVHVXB From Australia, joined Apr 2006, 5525 posts, RR: 18
Posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1892 times:

Quote:
SEOUL: North Korean leader Kim Jong-il expressed regret about his country's nuclear test to a Chinese delegation and said Pyongyang would return to nuclear talks if Washington backed off from its financial sanctions, a South Korean newspaper reported today.
"If the US makes a concession to some degree, we will also make a concession to some degree, whether it be bilateral talks or six-party talks," Kim was quoted as telling a Chinese envoy, the mass-circulation Chosun Ilbo reported, citing a diplomatic source in China.

Kim told the Chinese delegation that "he is sorry about the nuclear test," the newspaper reported

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...tory/0,20867,20614995-2703,00.html
http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/kim...test/2006/10/20/1160851118110.html
What do you think? Should the world take this seriously or will we just see more tests to come from the N koreans?

30 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineKalakaua From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 1516 posts, RR: 5
Reply 1, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1886 times:

Quoting VHVXB (Thread starter):

What do you think? Should the world take this seriously or will we just see more tests to come from the N koreans?

Come on... Someone with a face like this?




Gravity explains the motions of the planets, but it cannot explain who set the planets in motion.
User currently offlineMCIGuy From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 1936 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1881 times:

I'll bet he did! After getting turned over China's knee and getting a thorough spanking!  laughing 


Airliners.net Moderator Team
User currently offlineWindshear From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 2330 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1874 times:

Actually I am 50/50 on this. I just read an in-depth article in Newsweek and it seems NK wants to negotiate, as their main concern (manic concern) is for their own existence. Guaranteeing their existence and showing NK "respect" was the Clinton administration's strategy, and it got them far.

I bet you China beat the crap out of them, in a diplomatic tone of course Big grin
I really think the US must initiate a new strategy, not a full concession, but at least a shift in attitude.

I would how ever also remind you that Iran is watching, and this makes the room for error very small. Foreign policy is difficult  Smile

Boaz.



"If you believe breaking is possible, believe in fixing also"-Rebbe Nachman
User currently offlineTransIsland From Bahamas, joined Mar 2004, 2046 posts, RR: 9
Reply 4, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1869 times:

"I believe it is peace in our time."

He might regret the outcome of the test, whether it's because the Chinese are cussing him out, whether it's the Security Council's decision or whether it's the poor performance of the North Korean bomb, but I doubt he truly regrets having pressed the button.

So no, I don't believe a word he says, and I hope that nobody dealing with him will be as naive as Neville C. was in 1938 when dealing with a certain Mr Hitler.



I'm an aviation expert. I have Sky Juice for breakfast.
User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1869 times:

Quoting MCIGuy (Reply 2):
I'll bet he did! After getting turned over China's knee and getting a thorough spanking!  laughing 

Yup, I'll bet as Searpqx declared early on, China would deal with this in Chinese fashion, when they were ready, privately and without fanfare.

I'm sure Ole Krazy Kim got his penis smacked for this - hard - by the Chinese Gov't. Now he's almost backpeddling like a Duck coming in to Decoys.

Begs several questions though:

What about the future tests Krazy Kim delcared the North Koreans were going to accomplish?

If Krazy Kim performs more tests, what will China do? On the assumption they already did something anyway.

What will the US Gov't do?

Will Condi Rice have what it takes to get the six-party talks rolling again?

What will the Gov'ts of Japan and South Korea do now?


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31684 posts, RR: 56
Reply 6, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 1843 times:

Talking from a Position of Strength  Smile
Thats what he thinks.
regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineNeilYYZ From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 1818 times:

I doubt he's sorry that he conducted the tests. I bet he's sorry that he's in crap over conducting them. And I wouldn't doubt that he'd test another one if the opportunity arose.

User currently offlineGarnetpalmetto From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 5395 posts, RR: 52
Reply 8, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1808 times:

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 5):
What about the future tests Krazy Kim delcared the North Koreans were going to accomplish?

According to this article, http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20061020/ap_on_re_as/nkorea_kim_nuclear, he's told the Chinese he's not planning any future tests. Makes you wonder just what the Chinese said to Kim. . .



South Carolina - too small to be its own country, too big to be a mental asylum.
User currently offlineKaiGywer From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 12251 posts, RR: 35
Reply 9, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1802 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Without being an expert by any means, I think the US could take the first step and easen the sanctions. Of course if he screws up, back come the sanctions. The same goes for Cuba in my mind, ease the sanctions here as well. Both of these countries could benefit greatly from eased sanctions, and by doing this, the US might create new friends/allies.


911, where is your emergency?
User currently offline7474ever From Israel, joined Oct 2006, 370 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1795 times:

North Korea is an excellent example that the world (UN) is completelty unable to prevent a dictature from getting nuclear weaponry...

User currently offlinePlymSpotter From Spain, joined Jun 2004, 11655 posts, RR: 60
Reply 11, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1784 times:

I think he's trying to work the international political scene so to speak. He's gone and done what he wants by exploding the bomb - to show to the people of North Korea that he is still their all powerful leader who they should all respect, and now he's going to try and get back in the good books of the rest of the world by back peddling a little.

It doesn't matter if he is seen as weak by the world, the people in North Korea who really need to see that he is in fact weak are not allowed to because of news and media censorship, so its almost a win win situation for him, if he handles it carefully which he seems to be doing.

I also find it very hard to believe that China did not know that the nuclear test was going to take place.

Dan Smile



...love is just a camouflage for what resembles rage again...
User currently offlineKaiGywer From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 12251 posts, RR: 35
Reply 12, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1780 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
FORUM MODERATOR

Quoting 7474ever (Reply 10):
North Korea is an excellent example that the world (UN) is completelty unable to prevent a dictature from getting nuclear weaponry...

Which then begs the questions... If we can't beat him with sanctions, why not attempt a partnership. Then he can have as many nukes as he wants for all I care, as he won't use them on us.



911, where is your emergency?
User currently offline7474ever From Israel, joined Oct 2006, 370 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1770 times:

Quoting KaiGywer (Reply 12):
why not attempt a partnership.

Similar to the one in the cold war period ?


User currently offlineCfalk From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 14, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 1760 times:

Quoting VHVXB (Thread starter):
Kim told the Chinese delegation that "he is sorry about the nuclear test," the newspaper reported

About as sorry as I was the first time I got laid...

Quoting KaiGywer (Reply 12):
Which then begs the questions... If we can't beat him with sanctions, why not attempt a partnership. Then he can have as many nukes as he wants for all I care, as he won't use them on us.

The problem is that North Korea cannot allow itself to permit South Korea to remain independent once they broadcast to their own people that they have the Bomb and can stand toe to toe with the US.

This is their version of history (taken from the DPRK tourism website)





I'll leave you to browse the rest at http://www.korea-dpr.com/menu2.htm , but my point is that their people (including those in positions of power in the military) have been brainwashed that South Korea is an aboration that must be eliminated as soon as the imperialist yankees can be made to stop supporting it. They simply will not accept making peace when they have nukes - it would be tolerating the intolerable.

If I lived in Seoul, I would consider moving out.


User currently offlineBHXFAOTIPYYC From Portugal, joined Jun 2005, 1644 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1759 times:

Quoting KaiGywer (Reply 12):
Then he can have as many nukes as he wants for all I care, as he won't use them on us.

And you'd be willing to take his word on that?

Quoting Windshear (Reply 3):
Actually I am 50/50 on this. I just read an in-depth article in Newsweek and it seems NK wants to negotiate, as their main concern (manic concern) is for their own existence. Guaranteeing their existence and showing NK "respect" was the Clinton administration's strategy, and it got them far.

I was reading that last night. Without a doubt I would say that Kim Jung Ill's survival is the only thing on his mind. The Chinese had a "quiet word" in his ear for sure. They will not tolerate N. Korea misbehaving, and Kim knows that. I'm sure this whole nuclear issue is just a ploy to get more aid to prop up his regime.



Breakfast in BHX, lunch in FAO, dinner in TIP, baggage in YYC.
User currently offline7474ever From Israel, joined Oct 2006, 370 posts, RR: 0
Reply 16, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1753 times:

Quoting BHXFAOTIPYYC (Reply 15):
I'm sure this whole nuclear issue is just a ploy to get more aid to prop up his regime.


You might be right about that. Still, he's extremly dangerous. The world simpy can not count on his word, no matter what his plans are.


User currently offlineBHXFAOTIPYYC From Portugal, joined Jun 2005, 1644 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1740 times:

Quoting 7474ever (Reply 16):
You might be right about that. Still, he's extremly dangerous. The world simpy can not count on his word, no matter what his plans are.

Ditto with that nutjob in Iran, except that we DO know what his plans are.



Breakfast in BHX, lunch in FAO, dinner in TIP, baggage in YYC.
User currently offlineTedTAce From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 18, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1733 times:

Quoting VHVXB (Thread starter):
Should the world take this seriously or will we just see more tests to come from the N koreans?

I say we should tell them that as soon as they are at the table we will back off the sanctions.


User currently offlineSlovacek747 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 19, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1693 times:

He better be sorry...or we'd light up his world like its the forth of July.

Slovacek747


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31684 posts, RR: 56
Reply 20, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1685 times:

Quoting Slovacek747 (Reply 19):
He better be sorry...or we'd light up his world like its the forth of July.

Who cares about the "Sorry".Ask him to roll back the N Programme.
regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13114 posts, RR: 12
Reply 21, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 1674 times:

Sure he is sorry, like a drunk is the morning after and saying they won't drink again...until a few hours later.
We have to find some balanced way, especially with the cooperation of China to pressure North Korea's 'deal leader' into giving up his nuke program. Kim Jong Ill ought to worry about feeding his people, rather than working on a nuke program as food will more likely keep the loyalty of his people.


User currently offlineSearpqx From Netherlands, joined Jun 2000, 4344 posts, RR: 10
Reply 22, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1598 times:

Quoting VHVXB (Thread starter):
What do you think? Should the world take this seriously or will we just see more tests to come from the N koreans?



Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 5):
I'm sure Ole Krazy Kim got his penis smacked for this - hard - by the Chinese Gov't. Now he's almost backpeddling like a Duck coming in to Decoys.

Like a couple of others have mentioned, he's not sorry for the test, but I bet he's very sorry he's pissed the Chinese off. He completely miscalculated their reaction and now he's playing nice to calm them down. I also think he's a little taken aback by the world reaction - he was assuming he'd be treated like Iran, endless discussions but no real action.

My guess is he's very concerned about the Chinese reaction and will do whatever it takes (the apology, especially in Eastern culture, is a very big deal, even if its aimed at China) to mollify them. He also now knows what their limits are. So, I fully expect him to abide by no more tests, but he will continue to develop his capabilities in secrets (since he got away with that before). As long as the Chinese keep the current line, so will he.



"The two most common elements in the universe are Hydrogen and stupidity"
User currently offlineLTU932 From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 13864 posts, RR: 50
Reply 23, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1566 times:

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 5):
What will the Gov'ts of Japan and South Korea do now?

Slightly OT, but I saw a documentary once about Japan and some of their citizens being abducted by the DPRK, where the Japanese people were demanding that the abductees were to be allowed to return to Japan. Some people were even screaming for a much tougher Japan and even for their own nuclear bomb.

Given the sensitivity of the abductions of Japanese citizens by the DPRK in their foreign and domestic affairs, I wonder how the Japanese people have reacted to Krazy Kim's nuke test and if their anger on this will have a serious effect on Japanese defence and domestic politics.

Quoting KaiGywer (Reply 12):
why not attempt a partnership.

Because he will take advantage of any possibility to double cross the US and all others.

Quoting HAWK21M (Reply 20):
Ask him to roll back the N Programme.

Change the "ask" with "demand". China's role in this matter will be most critical. If they can continue to keep pressure on the DPRK regarding these tests, then perhaps they PRC can even persuade them out of the nuclear programme. However, this is highly unlikely IMO. Eventually Krazy Kim might dismiss the PRC as an ally of the US.


User currently offlineJGPH1A From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (7 years 11 months 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1564 times:

I can't believe nobody else has posted this...



it explains a great deal.... Smile


25 7474ever : Just guessing...they're thinking about getting nuclear weapons as well...?
26 DLKAPA : All she must do is utter the words "Madelin Albright (or however it's spelled)" in Kim's presence, and he'll back down immediately, after a banshee-s
27 Post contains images LTU932 : I already mentioned that while commenting on the abductee issue shown in that documentary. I thought they were pretty chummy in each other's presence
28 Halls120 : You are kidding, right? The North Koreans built the nuclear reactors Clinton promised them, from which they get fuel rods that can be reprocessed to
29 ConcordeLoss : Same goes for Israel.
30 7474ever : Well, Israel, as far as I'm concerned, is a democratic country. Not a perfect one, but still it is. You have too be a fool not see to difference.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Kim Jong-Il: How Vain Can You Get? posted Thu May 26 2005 18:02:58 by TWISTEDWHISPER
India Tests New Nuclear Missile posted Sat Jan 26 2002 10:12:03 by Indianguy
Senate Endorses India Nuclear Deal posted Fri Nov 17 2006 04:38:43 by Aseem
Man Arrested With $78,000, Nuclear Info posted Thu Nov 16 2006 19:15:02 by Jetjack74
Federline Unleashes Nuclear Option Sex Tapes posted Wed Nov 15 2006 02:55:23 by Dougloid
A Fully Nuclear Iran posted Wed Nov 15 2006 00:38:29 by Allstarflyer
Did North Korea Conduct Second Nuclear Test? posted Wed Oct 11 2006 02:00:19 by AerospaceFan
Who Else Is Ill? posted Mon Oct 9 2006 16:52:25 by PlymSpotter
N Korea Conducted A Nuclear Test? posted Mon Oct 9 2006 04:53:42 by Dtwclipper
Experts Warn Of Accidental U.S.-Russia Nuclear War posted Sat Oct 7 2006 22:27:41 by AerospaceFan