Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
TSA Imposes "5-day Waiting Period" On Flyers  
User currently offlineQueso From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (7 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1565 times:

Source (read carefully): http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s2i11225

Fair-use excerpt, full article available at above link.
"WASHINGTON, DC -- The U.S. Transportation Security Agency announced it will impose more airline restrictions following the terrorist threat in the United Kingdom. Beginning immediately, all passengers will be required to wait five days before traveling.

"Travelers must wait five days after buying a ticket before they can board an airplane," TSA spokesman Kip Hawley explained. "The purpose of this is to prevent terrorism by giving the purchaser a chance to 'cool off,' rather than potentially boarding an aircraft in a fit of anger or rage. Too many terrorist acts are completed within hours of a ticket purchase."

The waiting period will be applied to all domestic and international flights. "The September 11th hijackers boarded domestic planes," Hawley recalled. "Had a waiting period been in effect, the attack would have been foiled until September 16th. We could have completely evacuated the World Trade Center and the Pentagon during that 120-hour window. Thousands of lives would have been saved.""

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTedTAce From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (7 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1555 times:

Thespoof?

Wonderful. Re-title this thread it is  redflag 


User currently offlineMDorBust From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (7 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1550 times:

Quoting TedTAce (Reply 1):
Thespoof?

Wonderful. Re-title this thread it is

I see someone doesn't get satire.


User currently offlineTedTAce From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (7 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1542 times:

Quoting MDorBust (Reply 2):
I see someone doesn't get satire.

I 'get' it. I just don't APPRECIATE the joke in question. It's obviously fake, where GOOD parody has an element of believability to it.


User currently offlineMDorBust From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (7 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1537 times:

Quoting TedTAce (Reply 3):
I 'get' it. I just don't APPRECIATE the joke in question. It's obviously fake, where GOOD parody has an element of believability to it.

Of course it's ludicrously fake, and would be completely asinine if it wasn't

That's the point.

Pointing out the ludicrous with the ludicrous. This satire has a direct parallel that is in effect, and equally ludicrous. Which makes the piece even more funny as just about anyone will instantly determine the piece to be an absolute absurdity, while often not questioning the real world equivalent. As you said, there must be an element of believability. Well, a real world parallel is pretty believable to me.


User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 12878 posts, RR: 12
Reply 5, posted (7 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1518 times:

I realize that this was a satirical piece, but don't we already do that with some people who have to get a visa long before they want to come to the USA, even if from waiver countries? Already, it is becoming more difficult to book last minute, with earlier cut off times to do so, although in part to make sure a name can be checked to see if on a (highly imperfect) no-fly list.

User currently offlineJwenting From Netherlands, joined Apr 2001, 10213 posts, RR: 19
Reply 6, posted (7 years 5 months 3 weeks 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 1511 times:

Quoting TedTAce (Reply 3):
I 'get' it. I just don't APPRECIATE the joke in question. It's obviously fake, where GOOD parody has an element of believability to it.

Some people will believe anything. If that wasn't the case conspiracy theories wouldn't be so common (especially among members of this site I sometimes think).



I wish I were flying
User currently offlineSW733 From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 6265 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (7 years 5 months 3 weeks 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1441 times:

Quoting TedTAce (Reply 3):
I 'get' it. I just don't APPRECIATE the joke in question. It's obviously fake, where GOOD parody has an element of believability to it.

Considering the fact that the TSA can be taken as a joke sometimes these days, you can never be too sure!


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
How Did This Hit Escape "Jacked Up" On MNF? posted Wed Nov 8 2006 08:31:29 by USAFHummer
"Constitutional Scholar" O'Donnell On 2d Amendment posted Wed Oct 4 2006 12:07:45 by AerospaceFan
"Scrabble" Airing On Espn posted Mon Oct 2 2006 00:19:21 by Tom in NO
The "F" Word On Channel 4 posted Wed Aug 2 2006 22:37:03 by Cosec59
Are There "Welcome" Signs On British Motorways? posted Thu Mar 23 2006 04:08:07 by TWFirst
"Waiting" The Movie posted Sun Feb 26 2006 05:26:51 by Copaair737
"War On Christmas" By Stephen Colbert posted Mon Dec 19 2005 16:55:52 by MattCLE
The "War On Christmas"... posted Sun Dec 11 2005 02:28:50 by B777-700
MTV "leaks" Confessions On A Dancefloor posted Sat Nov 12 2005 15:38:44 by FlyAUA
"Love On My Mind" - The Original Verison? posted Sat Aug 20 2005 21:51:59 by Braybuddy