RichardPrice From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2775 times:

The extra dollar never existed.

The original amount is $30.
The room is $25.
The 'pocketed amount' is $2.
The refunded amount is $3.

$9 x 3 = $27

The amount the Clerk pockets is within the $9 paid, the $3 given back makes the total up to $30, the $2 is deducted from the $27 not added to make the $25 room cost.

Go3Team From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 3267 posts, RR: 16
Reply 3, posted (8 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 2767 times:

Must be the new math they are teaching in schools these days.

RichardPrice From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 2736 times:

Quoting Rufruf (Reply 4):
It's all in interpretation. Logic ? maybe. numbers don't lie ............ right

Actually, in the puzzle given in your original post, numbers do lie.

You say that the three people get $1 each back, and the motel clerk pockets $2.

Then you say that $10 - $1 = $9. Thats reasonable enough.

However, in that $9 is a cut of the $2 the Clerk keeps, so to add it on later ($27 + $2 = $29) is wrong because its already counted in the running total. What should be added on is the three $1 refunds, which takes the total up to $30 as expected.

Nothings missing, the puzzle as given is basically incorrect on purpose in order to provide the problem stated.

The real question is - what are three people doing with a motel room together? Why havent I been invited?

Sv2008 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2006, 622 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (8 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 2736 times:

It's a trick with the wording.

Richard pretty much explaind it, but to add to it, the three really paid £0.66 each I think of the new amount to contribute to the extra them gave away.

TZ757300 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 2879 posts, RR: 6
Reply 7, posted (8 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 2695 times:

FutureSDPDcop From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 1294 posts, RR: 5
Reply 10, posted (8 years 2 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 2577 times:

Quoting CastleIsland (Reply 9): All I can say is that this sounds like an "hourly rate" at a sleazy motel in a bad part of town.

The coefficient of x^3 is zero since sin 0 = 0 thus the answer stops there.

Pretty simple if you ask me, it's just substituting values into equations. Requires no brains!

Now Shinkai here is a question for you. You took SIA from Singapore to Perth in 2001. When you changed planes in Singapore to catch the flights to Perth, You thought you were in:

Vikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10459 posts, RR: 26
Reply 19, posted (8 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 2415 times:

Quoting DocPepz (Reply 18): Now Shinkai here is a question for you. You took SIA from Singapore to Perth in 2001. When you changed planes in Singapore to catch the flights to Perth, You thought you were in:

1)Asia
2)Europe
3)Mars
4)A Hotel Room with 3 Men

Priceless!

But remember, Stephen Hawking doesn't do geography (geology).

DocPepz From Singapore, joined May 2001, 1971 posts, RR: 3
Reply 20, posted (8 years 2 months 2 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 2415 times:

My bad, the answer should be 3 - 13.5x^2. Not 15.5 as I said above. I did my A Levels in 2000 which was the last time I touched Maclaurin's series. Thankfully I still remember calculus though I've clearly forgotten how to do simple division. 27/2 is indeed 13.5 and not 15.5.

Shinkai From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 24, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 2023 times:

Quoting DocPepz (Reply 18): Now Shinkai here is a question for you. You took SIA from Singapore to Perth in 2001. When you changed planes in Singapore to catch the flights to Perth, You thought you were in:

1)Asia
2)Europe
3)Mars
4)A Hotel Room with 3 Men

i choose 1.

see you in Singapore Changi Airport this december!

25 RichardPrice
: If you actually mean what you wrote literally then nearly all the planets have a year longer than their own day - only Venus has a day longer than it

26 Rufruf
: Actually the answer is Mercury. Mercury takes 88 days to revolve around the sun . It's rotation ( as it spins on it's axis takes something like 288 da

27 RichPhitzwell
: It is very simple...but you can mark up both ways to come to two different profit levels and still claim to be a 30% markup. As a PM at one company w

28 Kalakaua
: Okay... LAPLACE, anyone?! This is so fun! Find L{f(t)} if f"(t) + 3f'(t) - 8f'(t)=0, f(0)=1 and f'(0)=2 * L{f'(t)} =sL{f(t)} - f(0) Theorem: L{y'(t)}

29 Rufruf
: To last post When dos a equation have a ( if ) in it ? At least in chemeistry both sides are equal ( = )

30 SpinalTap
: An answer: f(t) = exp(-1.5*t)*[cosh(sqrt(10.25)*t) + 3.5/sqrt(10.25)*sinh(sqrt(10.25)*t)] y = 2*exp(5*t) + 4*exp(3*t)