Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Blue Ray/HD-DVD/LCD/Plasma  
User currently offlineAA787823 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 2571 times:

Ok time to update the home enterainment center. I am trying to decide between Blue-Ray disc, HD-DVD for my disc player. I already have a collection of over 150+ DVD's. Also cannot decide between Plasma or LCD? Suggestions?

43 replies: All unread, showing first 25:
 
User currently offlineWalter747 From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 1440 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 2563 times:

what is blue-ray? *filler*


Hussel, Hussel, Husel, Grind, Grind, Grind
User currently offlineAA787823 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 2553 times:

Quoting Walter747 (Reply 1):
what is blue-ray? *filler*

Basically a competitor to HD-DVD.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_ray


User currently offline9V From China, joined Aug 2008, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 2541 times:

Quoting AA787823 (Thread starter):
Also cannot decide between Plasma or LCD? Suggestions?

Depends what size screen you want. LCD should give you the better picture quality but plasma screens have the advantage of size since they are bigger. If I was going to get a new tv I would only choose between a Sony and a Panasonic.


User currently offlineBill142 From Australia, joined Aug 2004, 8467 posts, RR: 8
Reply 4, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 2472 times:

Make sure your LCD/Plasma is a high defenition one other wise your HD-DVD/Blu-ray will be pointless.

Quoting DeltaGator (Reply 5):
To the OP I would give the Blu-Ray/HD-DVD formats some time to shake out kind of like the old days of VHS/BetaMax. One will ultimately be the loser and the players are still ridiculously expensive right now. Give it a year or so and see what happens.

Actually I think they will live harmoniously. The technology already exists to stuff both formats into the one machine. These will appear on the market in the not to distant future I would imagine.

However, if I had to choose a victor it would be Blu-Ray, as it appears to have more support from movie studies, developers and manufacturers.


User currently offlineDalb777 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 2192 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2453 times:

Quoting AA787823 (Thread starter):
Also cannot decide between Plasma or LCD? Suggestions?

Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't LCD screens have a longer life expectancy than plasma screens? I think plasma screens tend to burn out more than LCD's, but don't quote me on that.



Geaux Tigers! Geaux Hornets! Geaux Saints! WHO DAT!!!
User currently offlineSATX From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 2840 posts, RR: 7
Reply 6, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2451 times:

Quoting Dalb777 (Reply 11):
Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't LCD screens have a longer life expectancy than plasma screens? I think plasma screens tend to burn out more than LCD's, but don't quote me on that.

 checkmark  100%

LCD's are also easier to repair from what I understand.



Open Season on Consumer Protections is Just Around the Corner...
User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21525 posts, RR: 53
Reply 7, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2444 times:

Quoting Dalb777 (Reply 11):
Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't LCD screens have a longer life expectancy than plasma screens?

Yes and no - the actual LCD panel should have a much longer life than a plasma tube. But the backlight the LCD needs does indeed exhibit significant aging. It is replaceable in principle, but given the current state of technology (which is still very much transitional), it will probably not be worth it vs. the then much improved successor models.

Quoting SATX (Reply 12):
LCD's are also easier to repair from what I understand.

Only the backlight can be replaced (if you can get a new one at that time). Which is incidentally the main "consumable" in an LCD screen. The panels themselves can't be repaired, but the plasma one will degrade and "burn in", while an LCD doesn't.

On the issue of HD video: Unless you have an uncontrollable urge to be an early adopter, don't jump in now.

The main problems:

- It is not too likely that both Blue Ray and HD DVD will survive in the long run. You've got a 50:50 chance of ending up with an orphan.

- The DRM mechanisms in both formats are brutal - and what is worse is that they're still quite unreliable and quirky at this point.

- All components of your video playback system need to be fully approved by the content industry and fully conform to the DRM restrictions. If either one of them is not recognized, you end up with low-res playback or with a blank screen. At this point, this is happening quite frequently.

- Both formats even feature "revocation lists" which can turn your player into a low-res DVD player at the mercy of the content industry if they deem your particular model cracked at any point in time. Such revocation lists can be carried by any new disk which you might unwittingly have bought in the store and will cripple your player forever.

So in short, simply buy a good TV if you need one right now. Connect a conventional DVD player which has a decent up-scaler to HD resolution and you'll have a lot less hassle than the HD early adopters and still very decent quality.

Once the whole mess is sorted out (and the HD DRM either works properly for the consumer or is retracted), you can upgrade with much less trouble.

If you get a HD screen, it might still be a good idea to get one which is (hopefully!) compatible with the DRM protocol (HDCP/HDMI) since the screen is the component which is the most difficult to replace.


For data storage, Blue Ray looks a lot better than HD DVD; It has a much higher data capacity and will also allow for much more complex movie disks with more special features per disk. It also should have a lot more growth potential than the rather limited HD DVD. HD DVD is only a marginal improvement over conventional DVDs.

So in this regard, I hope Blue Ray will "win" the battle, but I sincerely hope the content industry either get it right eventually and stop screwing their own paying customers or they'll get screwed themselves.


User currently offlineDeltaGator From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 6341 posts, RR: 13
Reply 8, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2440 times:

Quoting Bill142 (Reply 8):
However, if I had to choose a victor it would be Blu-Ray, as it appears to have more support from movie studies, developers and manufacturers.

Perhaps Sony learned their lesson from BetaMax.

Quoting Klaus (Reply 14):
Both formats even feature "revocation lists" which can turn your player into a low-res DVD player at the mercy of the content industry if they deem your particular model cracked at any point in time. Such revocation lists can be carried by any new disk which you might unwittingly have bought in the store and will cripple your player forever.

Am I the only one getting pissed off by the copyright folks? How soon to the Norwegian punk cracks this stuff as well?



"If you can't delight in the misery of others then you don't deserve to be a college football fan."
User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21525 posts, RR: 53
Reply 9, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2435 times:

Quoting DeltaGator (Reply 15):
Am I the only one getting pissed off by the copyright folks?

Absolutely not! The biggest and most influential IT magazine in Germany "c't" is regularly explaining the newest atrocities and is severely chastising those jokers for it at every opportunity. And they're by no means isolated.

There's a lot of justification for a reasonable protection of artists and labels, but they're increasingly screwing their honest and paying customers, while the big-time pirates will almost certainly find their way around the limitations. In the end it might be easier and more convenient to buy a pirated copy than fiddling with the buggy and malfunctioning DRM...!   

Quoting DeltaGator (Reply 15):
How soon to the Norwegian punk cracks this stuff as well?

Don't know. But it can't be long...!   
The gauntlet has been thrown; My guess is that the dust will hardly have settled before the first cracks will be out.

[Edited 2006-11-20 08:26:57]

User currently offlineANCFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2429 times:

Quoting SATX (Reply 4):

 sarcastic 

Quoting SATX (Reply 10):

 sarcastic 

Quoting Klaus (Reply 14):

Excellent Klaus. I'm in need to replace my electricity sucking 60 inch Pioneer that's 12 years old fairly soon . . . and must decide between LCD and Plasma. It's a tough call. I'm concerned that the technology is still too new to make any purchase at the moment a smart one.

If YOU had to pick between a 45" LCD or a 45" Plasma, which would you choose? Manufacturer?

Keep in mind this monster Pioneer I have has been from Alaska to DC to North Carolina and back to Alaska in the last 12 years, and is still in fine form. It's not imperative it be replaced, but the time draws near.


User currently offlineZkpilot From New Zealand, joined Mar 2006, 4867 posts, RR: 10
Reply 11, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2423 times:

First things first...
LCD Vs Plasma.

Plasma is cheaper for the size thus allows you to have a larger screen for a set $ amount. They do however suffer from screen burn, and have a shorter life (most won't last longer than about 7 years of normal use without serious degradation). Plasma uses more electricity (about twice as much as a 32" CRT tv)

Having said that, LCD offers higher resolution and richer colours and will last longer (the LCD backlight can be replaced in several years and you will be back to 95% capability again). LCD uses about half as much power as a 32" CRT screen.

In terms of HD LCD vs Plasma there are several models out there claiming to be HD. A lot of these are on 768p resolution. True HD is 1080p (these are generally considered 9th generation plasma or their LCD equilvent).

Make sure they have at least 2 HDMI inputs also  

As for Blu-ray vs HD-DVD...
Both are good, but if I had to make a choice, it would squarely be on Blu-ray...
I think Blu-ray is the more capable, has more ability to grow, and is more widely supported by the companies and studios that really matter. PS3 also comes with Blu-ray and we all know how much of a phenomenon PS1 & 2 have been, no reason why PS3 shouldn't be just as successful (it is more powerful than XB360 and has the support).

As other people have said, I would hold off on getting a HD DVD Player for now both because of the cost at the moment, because of the initial bugs still being sorted out, and because of the format war.
In any case these are likely to be the last of the "disks" in 10 years time its all going to be solidstate (memory cards etc). There are already 2TB SD size cards being tested in Taiwan (thats 2000GB btw thats about 40-80x more capacity than a bluray or HDdvd disk).

Oh and Organic LED screens are just around the corner too... polymer screens etc..
basically it will look like one big sheet of plastic (that could be 14" right thru to the size of your entire wall) that will only cost about $20 to manufacture (development costs will make them initially expensive to buy however) and use 2% of the power of a normal size tv...  

hope that helps  

[Edited 2006-11-20 09:07:35]

[Edited 2006-11-20 09:27:34]


56 types. 38 countries. 24 airlines.
User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21525 posts, RR: 53
Reply 12, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2416 times:

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 17):
I'm in need to replace my electricity sucking 60 inch Pioneer that's 12 years old fairly soon . . . and must decide between LCD and Plasma. It's a tough call. I'm concerned that the technology is still too new to make any purchase at the moment a smart one.

Correct. They're still in a relatively steep development phase and they obsolete correspondingly fast right now.

Spending a lot of money on one of those transitional models might not be wise.

Quoting ANCFlyer (Reply 17):
If YOU had to pick between a 45" LCD or a 45" Plasma, which would you choose? Manufacturer?

No idea - I have no interest in HD video or TV right now. PAL resolution and quality is already substantially above NTSC (especially in widescreen transmissions) so I don't see the point, really.

You always need to remember that the aspect angle (dependent on your distance to the screen) and your physical visual resolution will determine whether you'd actually see anything different with HD equipment. Chances are that you wouldn't, in many cases.

Quoting SATX (Reply 18):
Those days are coming to an end. The DVD encryption system was indeed pathetic by nearly all accounts, but the new systems seem to have learned from all the previous missteps in the past.

Yeah. They've now developed a system which could probably not have been cracked back then...!   

Unfortunately for them, the crackers now have much stronger tools as well...!

Quoting Zkpilot (Reply 19):
Plasma uses more electricity (about twice as much as a 32" CRT tv)

Not necessarily - the backlight of an LCD always runs at full power while a plasma screen only has to power the pixels which are supposed to be lit, so the maximum consumption of a plasma screen may be higher, but the average consumption might still be lower than the constant consumption of the LCD.

Quoting Zkpilot (Reply 19):
Oh and Organic LCD screens are just around the corner too...

Organic LEDs, you mean? Yeah, that will probably be the ultimate stable technology after both plasma and LCD will have vanished again. They'll "just" have to resolve "a few" more lifespan and production issues...!

[Edited 2006-11-20 09:30:09]

User currently offlineZkpilot From New Zealand, joined Mar 2006, 4867 posts, RR: 10
Reply 13, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2411 times:

Quoting Klaus (Reply 20):
Organic LEDs, you mean? Yeah, that will probably be the ultimate stable technology after both plasma and LCD will have vanished again. They "just" have to resolve lifespan and production issues...!

Ja herr Klaus  Smile
They've aparently solved the colour issues they were having reproducing them etc so thats good...

Quoting Klaus (Reply 20):
Not necessarily - the backlight of an LCD always runs at full power while a plasma screen only has to power the pixels which are supposed to be lit, so the maximum consumption of a plasma screen may be higher, but the average consumption might still be lower than the constant consumption of the LCD.

Yes correct about that, but the whole thing about plasma is that it has to be kept in its plasma form which requires considerable (compared to CRT and LCD tvs) electricity.



56 types. 38 countries. 24 airlines.
User currently offlineSATX From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 2840 posts, RR: 7
Reply 14, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2408 times:

Quoting Klaus (Reply 20):
No idea - I have no interest in HD video or TV right now. PAL resolution and quality is already substantially above NTSC (especially in widescreen transmissions) so I don't see the point, really.

As someone who's seen both native NTSC and PAL, I must say that the difference is not that big and is also a far cry from HDTV/HD-DVD/Blu-Ray.

Quoting Klaus (Reply 20):

Yeah. They've now developed a system which could probably not have been cracked back then...!

Unfortunately for them, the crackers now have much stronger tools as well...!

I followed the DVD cracking situation from the beginning, the holes in the DVD security system were so wide you could drive a truck through them. I would expect this process to get much harder for everyone involved from here on out.



Open Season on Consumer Protections is Just Around the Corner...
User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21525 posts, RR: 53
Reply 15, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2408 times:

Quoting Zkpilot (Reply 21):
Ja herr Klaus

Watched a few too many cheesy WWII movies again, have we...?  mischievous 

Quoting Zkpilot (Reply 21):
Yes correct about that, but the whole thing about plasma is that it has to be kept in its plasma form which requires considerable (compared to CRT and LCD tvs) electricity.

Unless my memory fails me on this, I'd think that only the active cells will activate the gas into a plasma... black cells shouldn't consume any power at all...


User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21525 posts, RR: 53
Reply 16, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 12 hours ago) and read 2407 times:

Quoting SATX (Reply 22):
As someone who's seen both native NTSC and PAL, I must say that the difference is not that big and is also a far cry from HDTV/HD-DVD/Blu-Ray.

I've got the direct comparison... and believe me, the difference is substantial with a good TV!

With digital transmission it's basically down to the image resolution and the bit rate (with more or fewer compression artefacts), but at the aspect angle I'm usually watching TV, a substantial increase in resolution wouldn't make all that much of a difference to me.

Quoting SATX (Reply 22):
I followed the DVD cracking situation from the beginning, the holes in the DVD security system were so wide you could drive a truck through them. I would expect this process to get much harder for everyone involved from here on out.

They'll simply have to use a newer truck...! Big grin


User currently offlineSATX From United States of America, joined Apr 2005, 2840 posts, RR: 7
Reply 17, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 2402 times:

Quoting Klaus (Reply 24):
I've got the direct comparison... and believe me, the difference is substantial with a good TV!



Seriously, if you need a direct comparison to see the difference, then it's just not that big of a deal in my view. You certainly don't need a side-by-side comparison to see the difference between VHS/TV and DVD/DTV or between DVD/DTV and HDTV/HD-DVD/Blu-Ray. Even my little 20" LCD screen is hooked up to a DVD player that runs at an up-sampled 720p/1080i and even that blows away anything I've ever seen on standard PAL.



Open Season on Consumer Protections is Just Around the Corner...
User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21525 posts, RR: 53
Reply 18, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 2404 times:

Quoting SATX (Reply 25):
Seriously, if you need a direct comparison to see the difference, then it's just not that big of a deal in my view.

I was talking about comparing analog NTSC and PAL; And in that case the difference is just particularly striking with a good TV, even though it is unmistakable even on second-rate equipment.

As I said, in the digital domain the difference is much smaller since there the analog signal quality difference is removed from the equation.

Whether one actually sees the HD difference is dependent on eyesight, size of screen and viewing distance. At my TV's size and normal viewing distance, HD would mostly be wasted. I hate sitting directly in front of the TV.


User currently offlineDalb777 From United States of America, joined May 2005, 2192 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 3 hours ago) and read 2352 times:

Can someone explain what exactly a DLP screen is?


Geaux Tigers! Geaux Hornets! Geaux Saints! WHO DAT!!!
User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21525 posts, RR: 53
Reply 20, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2336 times:

Quoting Dalb777 (Reply 31):
Can someone explain what exactly a DLP screen is?

It's one of several types of video projectors; Like every projector, it needs relatively expensive projector lamps which wear out relatively quickly and it will probably not be bright enough for daylight use. DLP projectors have their quirks regarding quickly moving images (most digital screens do, but DLPs are particularly noteworthy).

This site seems to have a pretty good introduction into the technology:
DLPTVReview: How DLP TV Works


User currently offlineMirrodie From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 7444 posts, RR: 62
Reply 21, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2310 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I was about to start a thread about this and upon the confirmation linl, I saw this thread posted. so I'll just jump on here.


Having read the responses above already, let me say...

For looking at cameras, I know there is dpreview.com and dresource.com or something to that effect.

Is there a good website that is impartial and looks at the available techology in the newest flat screen LCDs and PLasmas and the pros and cons between them?


We've been hankering for a decent 42-47 inch flat screen, going over the fireplace and its time to get one. (the fireplace heat and plasma heat wont be a concern as the gap is well insulated)

So while I am not asking for advice, (the two camps hold solid points as to what is better), are there any decent websites to help us make a good choice?


Also, is there anyone out there that has owned BOTH, at one point and can tell their observations, as I think thats the best source of advice.



Forum moderator 2001-2010; He's a pedantic, pontificating, pretentious bastard, a belligerent old fart, a worthless st
User currently offlineGalapagapop From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 910 posts, RR: 4
Reply 22, posted (8 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 2304 times:

I'd hold off on the Blu-ray or HDDVD player for awhile, prices are way too high, costs in the industry tend to level off near the 3 year mark so I'd wait at least one more to get your money's worth. Start with a good digital DVD player that works with your LCD or Plasma TV. Its a huge upgrade from that of the previous analog ones. As for TV I'd go for LCD, last longer and are pretty clean now. And anyways HD quality really varies by cable/satillite provider. Verison's optic systems is fiber from house to machine, while some cable companies, such as Cablevision are fiber from machine to local pole(Some cases to house as well but only seen in densly populated areas), then goes to analog wire again. Better Quality than plain analog which is still dominant. It all varies on where you live. I bought a LCD projection HDTV and before I moved the clarity benefits were not that much. The big thing is just getting a digital picture first that makes the picture a whole lot clearer, the market never had time to roll out a huge just Digital line, instead it really just jumped to HD. HD adds a lot as well but you have to be in the right area with the right providers to fully see the full potential of your HD set. Luckily I have Cablevision with a fiber swap out to analog point 1/4 mile from my house.

Cheers!


User currently offlineMirrodie From United States of America, joined Apr 2000, 7444 posts, RR: 62
Reply 23, posted (8 years 1 month 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 2233 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Thanks for the advice so far.

I looked at some TVs the other day and was even more confused. As if it weren't hard enough with plasma vs LCD,then I saw there was 1080 i vs 1080p.

I saw a Pioneer Elite 1080P plasma which just looked awesome!

So are there impartial sites that can help make the decision making easier?



Forum moderator 2001-2010; He's a pedantic, pontificating, pretentious bastard, a belligerent old fart, a worthless st
User currently offlinePilotsmoe From United States of America, joined May 2005, 249 posts, RR: 0
Reply 24, posted (8 years 1 month 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 2222 times:

Quoting Zkpilot (Reply 11):
Plasma is cheaper for the size thus allows you to have a larger screen for a set $ amount. They do however suffer from screen burn,

It takes alot longer, but I have seen images burned into LCD displays before  Wink


25 David L : 1080p (progressive scan) plants a complete 1080-line frame in one go. 1080i (interlaced) works like current TV in that one scan puts 540 "odd numbere
26 Post contains links 102IAHexpress : Why waste your money on a plasma or lcd? For a thousand bucks you can get a brand new front projector that easily displays 100inches or more at 720p o
27 Mt99 : Or get a PS3 - well if u can...
28 Mirrodie : Its going over the fireplace and a projection screen won't work in the area we are finishing. But thanks.
29 102IAHexpress : Gotcha. Actually, unless you’re buying a $10,000 projector, a screen really isn’t worth it. It’s become common place to use non reflective whit
30 Post contains links and images Zkpilot : Quoting Klaus (Reply 15): Watched a few too many cheesy WWII movies again, have we...? nein, I used to have a German g/f back in the day but yeah can'
31 Post contains images Klaus : No problem. I appreciate the sentiment. But the formal "Herr ..." normally only goes with the family name and is a formal way of addressing someone,
32 Mirrodie : I'm hearing hte new plasmsa, perhaps by LG, have a feature that can reseve or white out the burn in on a plasma. ANy experience with that anyone? Soun
33 Klaus : I'd have my doubt about that. The burn-in effect is a physical degradation of the phosphor substances; The only hope would be to detect the worst-aff
34 Post contains links Fumanchewd : One interesting point is that Broadcom is developing a chip that combines both Blu-ray™ and HD DVD optical disc formats into a highly integrated, si
35 Post contains links AeroWesty : I know I'll get some flack for this answer, but having lived with all three high-end formats, rear-projection, LCD, and plasma, and viewed the latest
36 Post contains images Mirrodie : Actually, I have been keeping my eye on a Pioneer Elite Plasma. I think its a 50 inch. It looks great. As for what is pshing what through, all I know
37 Comorin : I bought a Pioneer 43" Plasma last Christmas and just love it. I spent a year researching this and that, and am glad didn't buy an LCD (Bravia). As fo
38 FlyVirgin744 : LCD vs Plasma seems to be biannual topic here. I bought a 42" plasma 4.5 years ago. NO BURN, still bright, works flawlessly. Most people who discuss t
39 Cory6188 : Agreed. My dad just bought a Panasonic 58" plasma after doing tons (and I mean tons - when he's buying something, he does a ridiculous amount of rese
40 Mirrodie : well, I still have my sights on a 50 inch pioneer. but that Elite Pioneer is big bucks, $7600 on sale. Then again, the newer 1080P LCD sets are lookin
41 PIA777 : I just got the 46" Sony Bravia LCD flat panel. I have the Directv HDTV package and the picture is unbeliveable. PIA777
42 FlyVirgin744 : No one makes a true 1080i plasma (1080x1920). And resolution is not everything. My plasma is 480p and because the brightness and contrast are so grea
43 Vikkyvik : Can only go by my limited experience: My roommate and I just bought a 40" Samsung LCD HDTV a few weeks ago. 1080i resolution. Quite nice, and got it f
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
HD-DVD Or Blu-Ray Disc, Your Thoughts? posted Mon Nov 21 2005 12:06:57 by UTA_flyinghigh
Vista, HD-DVD, Monitor posted Thu Feb 23 2006 06:27:07 by Lordanmol
Plasma Or LCD? Which Way To Go? posted Tue Apr 11 2006 07:03:27 by Luisde8cd
Plasma Or LCD Screen, Which Is Best? posted Sat Dec 17 2005 16:38:54 by KLMCedric
What Should I Buy - Pioneer Plasma Or Sony LCD? posted Sun Nov 20 2005 18:51:24 by Comorin
Plasma Tv V/s LCD Tv posted Sun Oct 23 2005 11:27:05 by HAWK21M
Edtv Plasma Or Hdtv DLP/LCD Projection? posted Tue Sep 27 2005 20:17:25 by MGA
Mac IMovie HD Question posted Fri Nov 17 2006 17:17:29 by Cumulus
DVD Ripping Software For IMac? posted Wed Nov 15 2006 22:13:56 by Cumulus
HD Video Cam Or Nikon D-80? posted Sat Nov 11 2006 15:36:28 by TedTAce