Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Chinese Copy The Beloved SmartCar!  
User currently offlineAlberchico From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 2908 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1766 times:

http://homeentertainment.engadget.co...xv-chinas-cmec-duplicates-smart-c/

Unfreaking unbelivable. If the U.S pulled something like this people would be screaming bloody murder ..........


short summary of every jewish holiday: they tried to kill us ,we won , lets eat !
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineNeilYYZ From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (7 years 7 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1753 times:

Beloved to whom? I have not seen many over here, although I do know one man who sold his about a month after getting it.

And yes, that looks like a direct rip-off, but I don't think I'd drive a Chinese (Asian) car made after a European car in North America. Just too many continents involved.


User currently offlineLTBEWR From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 13005 posts, RR: 12
Reply 2, posted (7 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 22 hours ago) and read 1708 times:

Problem is that the PRC government controlled companies are the biggest ripoffs of patents, trademarks, trade dress and copyrights in the world, and the government basically encourages it. I would suspect that most countries cannot allow the import of these Chinese Smart cars for design copying. Don't forget too that Daimler-Chrysler makes or does CKD assembly of cars in China (mainly Jeep models) in the PRC, so could put pressure on them from that subsidary.

User currently onlineL410Turbolet From Czech Republic, joined May 2004, 5651 posts, RR: 20
Reply 3, posted (7 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1655 times:

BTW, guess the brand...







hint: no, it is not a BMW or Mercedes

Quoting LTBEWR (Reply 2):
Problem is that the PRC government controlled companies are the biggest ripoffs of patents, trademarks, trade dress and copyrights in the world, and the government basically encourages it.

And the rest of the world does nothing about it...
Hey they blatantly steal our stuff but it's ok because Chinese market is too big so we better suck up to them and try to sell them some weapons instead...

singned: the EU

[Edited 2006-12-05 08:19:37]

User currently offlineBoeing4ever From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (7 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 1651 times:

What a waste...you see so many Chinese students in American engineering schools, they come home, only to rip off the future work of their former classmates so it seems.

The society that invented gunpowder, is now reduced to hacks.

 airplane B4e-Forever New Frontiers airplane 


User currently offlineManuCH From Switzerland, joined Jun 2005, 3010 posts, RR: 48
Reply 5, posted (7 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1632 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

I'm probably the only one with this idea, and feel free to flame me - but good for them if they manage to make some copies. It's up to the market to decide who's going to sell what: the Chinese clones are usually of bad quality anyway (keywords crash test, moose test, materials, etc), and if someone decides to buy those things it's up to them. Should they be of the same quality like the european original, well, then probably the original manufacturer should do something to make their originals even better, and maybe lower their absurd pay-for-the-name prices.

Edit: who loves the smart car anyway?  Smile

-Manuel

[Edited 2006-12-05 08:37:19]


Never trust a statistic you didn't fake yourself
User currently onlineL410Turbolet From Czech Republic, joined May 2004, 5651 posts, RR: 20
Reply 6, posted (7 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 1615 times:

Quoting ManuCH (Reply 5):
I'm probably the only one with this idea

I hope so, because you either don't know what you are talking about or your comments are intentionally assinine. Never heard of something called "intellectual property"???

Quoting ManuCH (Reply 5):
and maybe lower their absurd pay-for-the-name prices.

or maybe why not just turn their employees into slaves, forget about labor laws, work safety, hygienic standards and safe work conditions.
This is not just the case of some huge difficult-to-sympathize-with multinational companies which are being robbed with tacit support of Chinese government but also small and medium companies with few dozens or hundreds employees, which were manufacturing all kinds of products, investing energy, money and most of all their ideas in development and design and then you say it's "ok" for them just steal it, put it through reverse engineering and then dump it on the market identical product for some ridiculous price?


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31660 posts, RR: 56
Reply 7, posted (7 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 1606 times:

The Chinese are very good at Copying products.Surprisingly there are no rules Internationally to stop it.
regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineN229NW From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 1925 posts, RR: 32
Reply 8, posted (7 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 1585 times:

Quoting L410Turbolet (Reply 6):
Quoting ManuCH (Reply 5):
and maybe lower their absurd pay-for-the-name prices.

or maybe why not just turn their employees into slaves, forget about labor laws, work safety, hygienic standards and safe work conditions.

 checkmark 

In principle I think things like people paying extra money for a t-shirt or whatever just so it says Dolce and Gabbana or Abercrombie or whatever across the front of it is just sad. Furthermore, in some of these cases, the orginal brand names also exploit cheap sweatshop labor.

However, with engineered material--we're not talking t-shirts here--it ISN'T just a case of people paying for a name. The are not only massive differences in labor protection, safety standards, etc., but also a huge difference in how the things actually work.



It's people like you what cause unrest!
User currently offlineManuCH From Switzerland, joined Jun 2005, 3010 posts, RR: 48
Reply 9, posted (7 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 1553 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD MODERATOR

Quoting L410Turbolet (Reply 6):
you either don't know what you are talking about or your comments are intentionally assinine.

Consider it more of a provocation. I'm perfectly aware of what I'm talking about. But this Chinese "we copy everything" issue should wake some (not all, but some) companies up which have been sleeping and busy counting their revenue money.

My father works in the electrical outlet / power switchboard business for a major european company, and their products have recently been copied by the Chinese. Guess what? They have analyzed the copied product, and it turns out it's *better* than their original.

Now, instead of just getting mad and screaming at the Chinese, they took this "provocation" as a challenge to make their products even better, to justify the higher prices. They did, and everything's fine again.

Quoting N229NW (Reply 8):
The are not only massive differences in labor protection, safety standards, etc., but also a huge difference in how the things actually work.

So, let the public/market decide. I doubt anyone in the EU or in the US would buy a Chinese cloned car which kills you in your first crash only because it's cheaper. They will probably only sell cars in China, where Mercedes wouldn't sell many cars anyway.

Again, this was a provocation, I'm very well aware of how these things work. But instead of just jumping around and screaming at how morally wrong the Chinese are, our companies should just make sure that the Chinese won't be able to sell anything in our market, by making their own products better. Some already are.

-Manuel



Never trust a statistic you didn't fake yourself
User currently offlineSv2008 From United Kingdom, joined Aug 2006, 622 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (7 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1498 times:

These cars look similar on the outside, but the engineering isn't so easy, they are probably very different underneath.

It's no different really than .mp3 manufacturers copying the ipod design or something. Just cause they all resemble each other doesn't mean that you won't choose a brand name.

As someone else said, would you really buy one of those over the real thing? they are cheap for a reason.


User currently offlineSoups From Ghana, joined Jun 2004, 3438 posts, RR: 14
Reply 11, posted (7 years 7 months 1 week 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 1489 times:

its a simple click of the copy paste button


Next destinations, Suarabaya, beirut, paris, Accra
User currently onlineL410Turbolet From Czech Republic, joined May 2004, 5651 posts, RR: 20
Reply 12, posted (7 years 7 months 1 week 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 1395 times:

guess the brand, part II.





Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
What Is The Future Of The Chinese Car Industry? posted Sun Mar 26 2006 03:08:50 by Alberchico
Big Ron Insults The Chinese Now posted Mon Jan 24 2005 12:37:38 by Oly720man
Can India Ever Trust The Chinese. posted Wed Dec 29 2004 09:07:03 by HAWK21M
I Need A Copy Of The BP, Engen And Caltex Logo? posted Wed Nov 3 2004 14:38:24 by Imonti
I Need A Copy Of The BP Logo? posted Wed Nov 3 2004 14:25:39 by Imonti
The Best Chinese Take Out posted Wed Aug 11 2004 04:03:47 by Matt D
The Best Chinese Restaurant In London posted Sun Jun 6 2004 18:31:12 by United Airline
The Best Chinese Fast Food Joint... posted Fri Jun 4 2004 04:41:13 by Maiznblu_757
The Best Chinese Food Outside Asia posted Sat May 1 2004 06:28:56 by United Airline
The Chinese Buffet posted Wed Jan 21 2004 19:31:41 by LHMark