Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
How The Discussion Forum Rules Could Be Improved  
User currently offlineEK_A340 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (14 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 972 times:

I think that there should be against the rule to do homosexuality posts, because it is against the rule to do sexualy explicit posts. I was told that if that was done, we heterosexuality posts would be banned. But I thought that those kinds of posts were already against the rule.  

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBrissie_lions From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (14 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 945 times:

Or would you prefer it if all of us queers were to leave the forum?  

Get over it will ya....you show me one sexually explicit queer post!!


User currently offlineTWFirst From Vatican City, joined Apr 2000, 6346 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (14 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 942 times:

  (I think I understand what he meant, but jeez, what a rudimentary command of the language.)


Little boy, if you don't want to read posts pertaining to gay issues, then I have a simple suggestion for you:

Don't read them.


But please don't confuse "sexually explicit" with homosexual-oriented. Sexually explicit means using graphic language and referencing various aspects of hoohoodillies going into various types of cha chas. But a gay man talking about how he won his boyfriend's heart or discussing how discrimination is wrong has nothing to do with this.

Clear now?



An unexamined life isn't worth living.
User currently offlineIlyushin96M From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2609 posts, RR: 12
Reply 3, posted (14 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 929 times:

What do you expect from someone in the 13-15 age group?

EK_A340, a word of advice...think a little before you post. Statements like the one here make you look ridiculous. And the one about you saying someone changed your profile makes you sound paranoid.


User currently offlineBrissie_lions From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (14 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 927 times:

Can you please elaborate further for me.

So what he really means by sexually explicit posts, is that I am not able to give a *blow-by-blow* description of the coming weekend reconciling with my ex?    

Here's to ya D

Scotty


User currently offlineNicolaki From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (14 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 923 times:

EK_A340 :
Please read carefully. When post contains the words HOMOSEXUALITY and/or HETEROSEXUALITY it doesn't mean they are sexualy explicit! Simple as 1 ...2 ...3  

Nicolas Bourbillon
Montreal, Canada


User currently offlineTWFirst From Vatican City, joined Apr 2000, 6346 posts, RR: 51
Reply 6, posted (14 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 922 times:

Yes Scotty, I think that's what he really means. However, if you want to provide me that description privately via e-mail, I will be happy to read it.


An unexamined life isn't worth living.
User currently offlineBrissie_lions From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (14 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 918 times:

In the word's of someone I greatly admire:

"Consider it done"  

Hey, I meant to ask some time ago (maybe I did but you just ignored me...SLAP), your email addy....is it..

A***L*****@L******Div********.com ?

Cheers

Scotty


User currently offlineIlyushin96M From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2609 posts, RR: 12
Reply 8, posted (14 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 917 times:

Scotty, would that be cross-eyed with crossed fingers, wearing an Uncle Sam hat? 

User currently offlineTWFirst From Vatican City, joined Apr 2000, 6346 posts, RR: 51
Reply 9, posted (14 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 912 times:

Y**, but I think I'd rather you send such e-mails to my attention at Tor******@aol.com

Have I e-mailed you from work before? Or did you find this out some other sneaky way?  



An unexamined life isn't worth living.
User currently offlineBrissie_lions From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (14 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 904 times:

Don't have your Tor******@aol.com email addy? Could that be Torsodown@aol.com? Maybe Tortoises@aol.com?  

But yeah, you must have emailed me from work at some stage. Is the L***** your last name or are you actually a blood-sucking animal?  

Anyway you got mine, so send it my way.

Cheers

Scotty


User currently offlineSouthflite From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (14 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 903 times:

EK_A340 appears to like stirring up controversy. This post of his is just the latest in a series of stirrers such as "Should I become a Muslim?" and suchlike, all clearly intended to start a bunfight amongst the obvious divisions that such topics bring out.

His post regarding the purported change of the country in his user profile is a fabrication.

EK_A340 has already received one emailed warning from the Airliners.net team re. the rubbish that he posts here. This situation will not be permitted to persist.

Andrew (Southflite)
Corrections Editor
Airliners.net


User currently offlineBrissie_lions From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (14 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 894 times:

Howdy

Don't worry about it mate. We are over that now, and have moved onto Ab Fab....got anything to contribute at all?  

Cheers

Scotty


User currently offlineSouthflite From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (14 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 888 times:

Hey Aussie

Ad Fab??

As in Patsy & Edina?

Um, think maybe that one's lost on me, mate ...  

Never mind.

Gotta run, sleep calls   (guess you guys are already awake in Oz)
Ciao,
Andrew


User currently offlineTWFirst From Vatican City, joined Apr 2000, 6346 posts, RR: 51
Reply 14, posted (14 years 2 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 876 times:

I don't know about blood sucking but...


Oops. We can't be sexually explicit now, can we.



An unexamined life isn't worth living.
User currently offlineGUNDU From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (14 years 2 months 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 850 times:

Hey kiddo,SHUSH!Would you just keep your mouth shut and mind your own business?Johan please do not change the rules.




Gundu


Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is A.net (the Discussion Forum) Your Start Page posted Mon Oct 7 2002 17:19:07 by Sabena332
Africa-How The Borders Should Be Drawn? posted Thu Sep 23 2004 02:55:39 by L.1011
If Only The World Could Be Like Queens posted Thu Mar 25 2004 20:20:53 by Csavel
NHL's Buffalo Sabres Could Be On The Move posted Sat Dec 21 2002 01:51:09 by Ac_767
How Our Member Profiles Could Be Improved posted Sun Oct 8 2000 01:17:52 by EK_A340
Tin Tin Could Be Coming To Wellington, New Zealand posted Sat Oct 7 2006 09:32:07 by 777ER
Is The New Superman Meant To Be Jesus? posted Fri Jul 28 2006 14:59:57 by KLMA330
In The Mail: New Rules To Live By posted Wed Jul 12 2006 17:00:08 by Mrmeangenes
Be Careful When Taking Pics Or This Could Be You! posted Fri Jun 9 2006 19:07:09 by 9VSPO
BAB Moving To Oz? Could Be... posted Fri Jun 2 2006 11:30:47 by BaylorAirBear