Sponsor Message:
Non Aviation Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
French Military Victories  
User currently offlineDeskflier From Sweden, joined Jan 2007, 537 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 6 months 1 week ago) and read 1521 times:

Here is a laugh and a concerned thought:

1. Enter Google
2. Type the title to this thread
3. Click the "I feel lucky"-button

My question is: Is the result a sign of French military prowess or a sign of the level of American history education?


How can anyone not fly, when we live at a time when we can fly?
20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDc9northwest From Switzerland, joined Feb 2007, 2280 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (7 years 6 months 1 week ago) and read 1520 times:

Yeah...

It's a result of a mind that dislikes the French and that likes to joke around...

There was another one... I forget now though.


User currently offlineScorpio From Belgium, joined Oct 2001, 5025 posts, RR: 44
Reply 2, posted (7 years 6 months 1 week ago) and read 1494 times:

It's done with a technique called 'google bombing': http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_bomb

Quoting Dc9northwest (Reply 1):
There was another one...

Type 'miserable failure' into the Yahoo search engine, and pick the first link that comes up. Used to work on Google too, but no longer does. Today it links to a BBC article about the 'miserable failure' google bomb Big grin


User currently offlineSrbmod From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (7 years 6 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1473 times:

A similar thing would happen if you typed in "worst goaile on earth" (you have to misspell goalie in order for it work).
Big version: Width: 348 Height: 100 File size: 25kb


User currently offlineConfuscius From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 3852 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (7 years 6 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 1443 times:

Warterloo and Dien Bien Phu?

...and Camarón.

 Big grin

[Edited 2007-02-17 19:59:04]


Ain't I a stinker?
User currently offlineAloges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8702 posts, RR: 43
Reply 5, posted (7 years 6 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1403 times:

Quoting Scorpio (Reply 2):
It's done with a technique called 'google bombing': http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_bomb

I thought they had taken care of those? Well, the ones about GWB are gone at least... do I smell something fishy?  duck   Wink



Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlineNeilYYZ From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (7 years 6 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 1396 times:

I didn't know that the French ever had any military victories  Wink

User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29795 posts, RR: 58
Reply 7, posted (7 years 6 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 1374 times:

Quoting NeilYYZ (Reply 6):
I didn't know that the French ever had any military victories

I think the Rainbow Warrior counts.

That was a nice bit of work.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineRara From Germany, joined Jan 2007, 2071 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (7 years 6 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 1366 times:

I find it strange that everyone keeps linking the French to military defeat.... probably they didn't have any less or more of it than any other country.

It would be much more fitting to the Germans, wouldn't it? They haven't won a war since 1871, with some really spectacular defeats since then.



Samson was a biblical tough guy, but his dad Samsonite was even more of a hard case.
User currently offlineMaidensGator From United States of America, joined Jan 2007, 945 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (7 years 6 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 1366 times:

Quoting NeilYYZ (Reply 6):
I didn't know that the French ever had any military victories

I heard somewhere they won the French Revolution, but I'm not sure it's true....



The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers.
User currently offlineAloges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8702 posts, RR: 43
Reply 10, posted (7 years 6 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 1363 times:

Quoting L-188 (Reply 7):
I think the Rainbow Warrior counts.

That was a nice bit of work.

NZ justice doesn't seem to agree though.

Quoting Rara (Reply 8):
I find it strange that everyone keeps linking the French to military defeat.... probably they didn't have any less or more of it than any other country.

I think it's because they see themselves as "La Grande Nation", which is a bit of a provocation to nationalists in the US who make up the largest part of the freedom fried movement.

Quoting MaidensGator (Reply 9):
I heard somewhere they won the French Revolution, but I'm not sure it's true....

You'll soon read that it was only because the opponents were also French.

[Edited 2007-02-17 21:14:07]


Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlineLHStarAlliance From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (7 years 6 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 1354 times:

Quoting Rara (Reply 8):

It would be much more fitting to the Germans, wouldn't it? They haven't won a war since 1871, with some really spectacular defeats since then.

For both...


User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 12, posted (7 years 6 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 1346 times:

Quoting Rara (Reply 8):
I find it strange that everyone keeps linking the French to military defeat.... probably they didn't have any less or more of it than any other country.

Depends on which period of history you go through, really. Throughout the mediaeval period it's a story of rising French power, but for much of the time from then until the 20th century it's a tale of the frustration of French power, mainly by the British, whose control of the oceans constantly denied the undoubtedly powerful French ambitions. The only truly catatrophic defeat (i.e. affecting France's own independence) was in 1940.

It's a nice easy label of abuse to throw at the French, but realistically it's only the British who can properly do so - it was they, in their absolute determination to contain France*, who ensured France never gained an unchallenged hegemony at any point in their history.

And of course, is exactly why the British felt the recent winning of the Olympic Games to be so sweet, and so bitter for the French.

* I can go into long detail on this. The central point is that only France until the modern era ever had the opportunity of challenging British supremacy. Power on land (countries like Prussia for example) was meaningless in the global sense, power on the seas was the important issue.



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
User currently offlineAllstarflyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (7 years 6 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 1259 times:

Quoting NeilYYZ (Reply 6):
I didn't know that the French ever had any military victories

Not much, besides Charles Martel and Napoleon Bonaparte.

-R


User currently offlineRara From Germany, joined Jan 2007, 2071 posts, RR: 2
Reply 14, posted (7 years 6 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 1211 times:

If you look at it like that, most every significant Western power had its "golden age" and toyed with dominance at some point in time.

The Greeks did with Alexander the Great.

The Italians did with the Roman Empire.

I'll leave out the Franks..

Habsburg/Spain dominated the 15th century, and until the fall of the Armada its power was not in question on the seas.

During their Golden Age in the 17th century, the Dutch had the richest and economically most powerful country.

France in the age of absolutism and a bit later, with Napoleon Bonaparte.

In the 19th century, Britannia ruled (not only) the waves.

The Germans...well, yeah.

And finally, for the last 50 years at least, the Americans had their stab at being the most powerful country of the world.


If one thing can be learned from this, then it's as soon as one European country becomes too powerful and threatens to assume dominance, the others will rise and pull it back again.

I guess this is what makes Europe different from other areas of the world, like East Asia, where China has been unchallenged for 2000 years.



Samson was a biblical tough guy, but his dad Samsonite was even more of a hard case.
User currently offlineLOT767-300ER From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (7 years 6 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1206 times:

French Armed Forces:





User currently offlineBill142 From Australia, joined Aug 2004, 8442 posts, RR: 8
Reply 16, posted (7 years 6 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1197 times:

Quoting Dc9northwest (Reply 1):
There was another one... I forget now though.

type in "weapons of mass destruction" and hit I'm Feeling Lucky.

Quoting LOT767-300ER (Reply 15):
French Armed Forces:

Ahh... so that's the new eurofighter.


User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21442 posts, RR: 54
Reply 17, posted (7 years 6 months 6 days 14 hours ago) and read 1176 times:

Quoting Banco (Reply 12):
And of course, is exactly why the British felt the recent winning of the Olympic Games to be so sweet, and so bitter for the French.

Wait - Britain actually won anything at the Olympics...?  angel 

Quoting Bill142 (Reply 16):
Ahh... so that's the new eurofighter.

No... the configuration is all wrong. Looks more like the entire F-22 fleet the US airforce can afford after the Iraq bills have been paid...!  mischievous 


User currently offlineAloges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8702 posts, RR: 43
Reply 18, posted (7 years 6 months 6 days 13 hours ago) and read 1168 times:

Quoting LOT767-300ER (Reply 15):
French Armed Forces:

Funny that someone from Poland would joke about anyone else's military...  duck 



Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlineConfuscius From United States of America, joined Aug 2001, 3852 posts, RR: 1
Reply 19, posted (7 years 6 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 1149 times:

"Funny that someone from Poland would joke about anyone else's military..."

For that comment you shall be shot in a Polish firing squad...in elephant costume.




Ain't I a stinker?
User currently offlineBanco From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 14752 posts, RR: 53
Reply 20, posted (7 years 6 months 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1114 times:

Quoting Rara (Reply 14):
Habsburg/Spain dominated the 15th century, and until the fall of the Armada its power was not in question on the seas.

The unfortunate position for Spain as the 16th century progressed was the trading importance of Flanders. Through successive pissing off of the major European powers (particularly France and Spain) because of its tacit encouragement of piracy, England found itself alone, vulnerable and liable to invasion. It was at this point in the early Elizabethan era that the English recognised that their survival was dependent on naval power, and the need for dominance of the local seas became critical. By a happy accident, England was located directly on the trade routes from France and Spain up to Flanders and beyond to the Baltic. The reason Spanish vulnerability became clear was because of the English location right on the crux of those routes; without high seas supremacy (not just superiority) they were hamstrung.

It was a lesson the English, and later the British, never forgot, and laid the groundwork for the rise in British power through the succeeding centuries. Unfortunately for them, it was a lesson not lost on the Dutch either, and that is why through the seventeenth and first part of the eighteenth century, the Dutch became the leading martitime power, until the British finally displaced them.

Quoting Rara (Reply 14):
and a bit later, with Napoleon Bonaparte.

No, never. This is the problem that arises through lack of correctly weighting the importance of command of the seas. It is all too easy to look at French power in the Napoleonic era and view them as dominant, but they never were. The supreme power on land in Europe, yes, but British sea power meant that France was always in a defensive position in world terms. Although Napoleon had his grand schemes for invasion of Britain, it was never a starter, because the naval blockade of France always prevented the unification of French fleets divided between the northern seas and the bases in the Mediterranean. Hindsight always changes the perspective, and the concern over Napoleon was absolutely genuine at the time, but in truth, he never had the remotest chance of becoming the supreme global power so long as the Royal Navy was dominant.



She's as nervous as a very small nun at a penguin shoot.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

This topic is archived and can not be replied to any more.

Printer friendly format

Similar topics:More similar topics...
My Appoligies To The French Military For This But. posted Fri Mar 14 2003 13:21:58 by L-188
French Military Prowess posted Sat Feb 8 2003 14:04:47 by Galaxy5
Question For The French posted Wed Feb 7 2007 15:15:08 by Dougloid
Iran Wants Closer Economic, Military Ties To Iraq posted Mon Jan 29 2007 17:35:37 by Falcon84
French Regional Prince Fired From His Own Party posted Sat Jan 27 2007 16:42:35 by Beaucaire
Panel: US Military Facing Major Budget Crisis posted Fri Jan 26 2007 01:16:02 by UH60FtRucker
French Philanthropist Abbé Pierre Dies At 94:RIP posted Mon Jan 22 2007 13:16:00 by RootsAir
Anyone Experience The French Foreign Legion? posted Fri Jan 19 2007 02:00:42 by ArmitageShanks
Gov't/Military Air Travel Question posted Mon Jan 15 2007 04:25:13 by Pope
Military Vets Tell Me If This Was Joke posted Wed Jan 10 2007 03:48:07 by RJdxer